That's probably right; I don't think I compensate for the length of the
through adaptor. I'll have a look at it :-)
--
Rune / 5Q5R
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 00:26, Kurt Poulsen <kurt@...> wrote:
Hi Rune
Have a look on my answer to Erik about his T-Check experiment. There sis
some issues about subtracting the delay of the thru adaptor which is
missing in you calibration setup (I think ?)
Kind regards
Kurt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af Rune
Broberg
Sendt: 25. september 2019 22:52
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] NanoVNA Saver
Hi Bryan,
The signs on those phase plots have *really* been bothering me. It's one
of the places where it really shows how much of a newbie I am at RF
measurements: I have no idea what way the phase is *supposed* to go, so I
might well end up flipping it ;-)
I think I got it all pointing the same way in the coming version, which is
in a development branch on GitHub. Maybe I'll post a screenshot and have
you (or others) sanity check it before I release!
Thanks for taking the time to report it! Reports like these really help
make the software better.
--
Rune / 5Q5R
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 22:42, bryburns via Groups.Io <bryburns= <mailto:
[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote:
Rune,
Using nanoVNA-saver0.0.11
It looks like the S21 phase in the marker box is of opposite sign to
the plot of S21 phase. I think the phase in the plot is correct.
--
Bryan, WA5VAH
