¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Measure a single wire (not coax) for frequency


 

Yes, the NANOVNAs are capable of making these measurements. HOWEVER, and
that's a huge "however", the chassis of the NANOVNA needs to supply the
other portion of the wire. An end fed is only half the antenna. The other
half must be supplied by a long set of wires with a good connection to
earth (far more than a single earth rod) This is to provide a good
conductor against which the end fed whatever can work against.

Example: Ask yourself which of the following will radiate and why / why
not:


[image: image.png]
The top illustration is like connecting only one lead to a battery (if this
were DC). No current can flow as there is no return. Therefore, the top
will not radiate as there is no counterpoise, or, in more "accepted"
language among the amateur community, "ground".

The bottom will, indeed, radiate (a simple 1/2-wavelength dipole) as there
is a return for the current. This is analogous to connecting both
terminals of a battery (if this were DC).

Ideally the return for the chassis of the NANOVNA should be lossy to
prevent it from entering the measured resonant behavior of the EFW (end fed
wire).

Dave - W?LEV

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 7:00 PM Brian Donaldson <brianb253@...> wrote:

Real world. Interesting. If Hertz and Marconi stayed in the real world,
would we have what we have now?

So, if the tool we have won't work, fine. I understand that. I have seen
where random lengths of wires were bundled together and the return loss on
various frequencies were charted. But I am not sure what tool was used or
how the individual performed the test. That is why I am curious to know if
the NanoVNA might be able to do this.

It is all good. Thanks guys for the reply.

Brian D
KF6BL





--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
--
Dave - W?LEV

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.