¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Nanovnasaver plots


 

Roger:

I¡¯ve always thought of the conventional antenna parameter measurement as the antenna being in series, i.e., Z load = Zs = Rs + Xs

Cebik notes that, with respect to modeling and looking at antennas that ¡°parallel ¡­ circuits don¡¯t have much until it¡¯s, since they are only the converted counterparts of ¡­ series circuits.¡±

()

He does offer the case of looking at a beta or hairpin match, in which the matching section at the feedpoint is in parallel with the series feedline and load antenna, so clearly there is a place for conversion.

But could you expand a bit on situations in which you use the parallel model in general, or specifically to the sketch you posted?

No criticism implied, I¡¯m just looking for situations where parallel conversion might be advantageous, other than alternative S measurements using Y rather than Z, such as Jeff K6JCA has described below




Looking forward to your thoughts.

73
Ed McCann
AG6CX

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.