开云体育

circle on transistor symbol is used to indicate that this is discrete component (individually packaged transistor - has nothing to do with form or shape of package). transistors without circle

Thanks to both of you. It's saves ma a lot of struggling with footprint design.

Hello Robert. No, i think envelope just means envelope. But if the envelope is conductive, it can be used as a shielding, and thats important. Some early transistors are in glasshousings with black

Guilty as charged :). Actually I was taught that a transistor with a ring was a discrete component, whereas without the ring it was part of an integrated circuit. In practice since everything at that

Hello Robert. Yes, i used this postfix method in my first attemp to create a library when i noticed that my symbols were much too big...... Of course, EN60617-5 contains as No. 05-05-02 only one

In that case I'll go ahead with a basic set of symbols. I'll leave Bernd's library alone, copying symbols as necessary. I will shrink some components, so perhaps I should postfix the components with

By accident I came across one solution to creating a searchable PDF, this is not a solution for everyone because it uses Adobe Acrobat X. I sent a PDF schematic to an assembly house, the person who

Hi Bernd, ? Thanks for your responses.? I went through the KiCAD posts looking for discussions on grid sizes; it looks like EESchema will retain the mil grid (in all the posts I can find regarding

Sorry, an error: No, its actual E5. So send me your suggestions for improvement. With best regards: Bernd Wiebus alias dl1eic

Hello Cirilo. If this is, it is marked by the symbols name. Thomething with "old". In this cases, there are existing two symbols, one for the old standard, ans one for the new. This is because here

Hmmm. I have a PDF of the "IEC 60617 database snapshot created on 2001-12-12" (via Baidu) and I would be prepared to make a start creating kicad symbols from it if that's the latest we can get hold

See if this works for you.... ________________________________ To: kicad-users@... Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:39:47 AM Subject: [kicad-users] Si570 library ? Hi there, does anyone have

Hello Gerard. Look at the attachment for "SI570_SI571_11Jun2012.zip" But be careful, fresh backen and burning hot, but jet untested. There are three different footprints. One SMD-Satandart like

Hi there, does anyone have a library (schematic and foot print) for the Si570 oscillator? Thanks in advance. 73 from Gerard, F6EEQ

Hi Robert, ?Some of those symbols do comply with the IEC standard and many that don't do comply with older standards. Anyway, as I said, what's important is that people can read the schematics. I

Have you seen Bernd Wiebus's EN60617 (aka IEC60617) kicad library? http://www.kicadlib.org/ If it's correct (I have no reason to doubt that but I have nothing to check it against, though maybe those

Sure, but many of the ASME standards were transferred to IEC and some later became an ISO standard - but having said that, many of the symbols people created for EESCHEMA do not comply with

Miguel, I agree with you about funding. I would even be willing to donate money myself for desirable features. I'm particularly enthusiastic about the scripting work your are doing and I hope I can

I'm not sure what is the intention of this thread but please remember that kicad is international and these are all US standards. Component annotations are almost certainly governed by an ISO