Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Ham-Amplifiers
- Messages
Search
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
Good day Jim and Group. ? Excellent effort as always Jim.? In the dim and distant past before spreadsheets we used to make Peter's (GM3SEK's) Rm as 200 ohms and the Q of the eL coil as 2. As you've noticed all that stray capacitance around the tube sets the minimum Q for the Pi part of the circuit. I've got all the formulae written on a crib sheet. makes working out easier. 73 de Michael G3TCA., ================== |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
开云体育Thank you, Jim. I’ve had to reverse engineer other people’s results in the past to find out that we were actually talking about the same thing. I have learned one thing in my 40+ years as a professional Electrical Engineer – nomenclature is king. And, everybody needs to be on the same page. Avoids a lot of meaningless arguments. ? Respect, for all that work. ? John VK6JX ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jim VE7RF
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 12:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ham-amplifiers] High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78) ? Finally got it all figured out.? It's a bit of a complicated mess.? There is a total of 5 different? 'Q's'? involved on the GM3SEK? PI-L spreadsheet.? ? The short of it is.... I had to maladjust the 'total network Q' (line 39) to '7.74' ......so that the 'PI network Q'? (line 82, called? 'Q0PI' ) = 6.0? ? The 'PI network Q'? ? is what Peters is using to enter his Q of 6.? This is the PI-net portion of the PI-L.? On the GM3SEK sheet, only line 38 can be changed.? It spits out everything else.? INPUT Q? ? =? 4.4? ( Line 83)? ( called Q1) Input Q + Output Q =? PI network Q.? (4.4 + 1.6 = 6.0)? ?( PI network Q on Line 82) The L NETWORK? Q? = 1.7? ?(line 75) ( called QL) OVERALL NETWORK Q? ( called? Q0) =? ?PI network Q + L network Q ( 6.0 + 1.7 = 7.7)? I also used Peters 200 ohm image Z, and 1100 ohm plate load Z.? ?Then the main coil? comes out to peter's 29.0 uh.? ? I did have to maladjust the plate choke to 141.5 uh? to get the main C1 tune cap = to peter's? 350 pf.? ( the plate choke value has a big impact on the C1 cap...as the 2 are in parallel electrically.? Software spits out 1487.2 pf for the C2 cap.? ( close to peters 1500 pf) Software spits out 7.66 uh? ( close to peters 7.65 uh)? ? Short of it is I'm entering...? 'overall network Q'... ..while peter is entering .... ' the PI net Q'? ? BTW, coil current in the main coil is? INPUT Q x dc plate current.... and not PI net Q? x DC plate current.? ? (I verified this via actual measurement).? 4.4 x 2.75 dc amps? = 12.1 RF amps in the main coil.? ? ?Same deal with the simple PI network ( INPUT Q x DC plate current = coil current.) So it's semantic at best.? On 40m, min OVERALL NETWORK? Q that can be used with a PI-L? is? 8 ...........? ?(This is all based on having the MIN C1 being at least 14 pf).? ? The lower Q concept works on 160+80m...... but not 40-10m.? The Tube C is just too great.? ? |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
Finally got it all figured out.? It's a bit of a complicated mess.? There is a total of 5 different? 'Q's'? involved on the GM3SEK? PI-L spreadsheet.? ? The short of it is.... I had to maladjust the 'total network Q' (line 39) to '7.74' ......so that the 'PI network Q'? (line 82, called? 'Q0PI' ) = 6.0? ? The 'PI network Q'? ? is what Peters is using to enter his Q of 6.? This is the PI-net portion of the PI-L.? On the GM3SEK sheet, only line 38 can be changed.? It spits out everything else.? INPUT Q? ? =? 4.4? ( Line 83)? ( called Q1) Input Q + Output Q =? PI network Q.? (4.4 + 1.6 = 6.0)? ?( PI network Q on Line 82) The L NETWORK? Q? = 1.7? ?(line 75) ( called QL) OVERALL NETWORK Q? ( called? Q0) =? ?PI network Q + L network Q ( 6.0 + 1.7 = 7.7)? I also used Peters 200 ohm image Z, and 1100 ohm plate load Z.? ?Then the main coil? comes out to peter's 29.0 uh.? ? I did have to maladjust the plate choke to 141.5 uh? to get the main C1 tune cap = to peter's? 350 pf.? ( the plate choke value has a big impact on the C1 cap...as the 2 are in parallel electrically.? Software spits out 1487.2 pf for the C2 cap.? ( close to peters 1500 pf) Software spits out 7.66 uh? ( close to peters 7.65 uh)? ? Short of it is I'm entering...? 'overall network Q'... ..while peter is entering .... ' the PI net Q'? ? BTW, coil current in the main coil is? INPUT Q x dc plate current.... and not PI net Q? x DC plate current.? ? (I verified this via actual measurement).? 4.4 x 2.75 dc amps? = 12.1 RF amps in the main coil.? ? ?Same deal with the simple PI network ( INPUT Q x DC plate current = coil current.) So it's semantic at best.? On 40m, min OVERALL NETWORK? Q that can be used with a PI-L? is? 8 ...........? ?(This is all based on having the MIN C1 being at least 14 pf).? ? The lower Q concept works on 160+80m...... but not 40-10m.? The Tube C is just too great.? ? |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
开云体育He didn’t, Mike. He said “playing dumb”. Not the same thing at all ! Good to see passion is not dead around amplifiers. On 11 Mar 2024, at 21:27, mike repinski via groups.io <mikflathead@...> wrote:
|
Re: Kudos to Digi Key and Hammond Mfg.
开云体育If it's shipped freight, it likely is dropshipped directly from
the factory (Hammond). Mine was. Steve, K0XP
On 3/11/2024 3:16 PM, Alan - W5ARM
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 08:23 AM, NI5L wrote: --
See my QRZ.com page at |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
We really don't need people being called dumb.
On Sunday, March 10, 2024 at 08:25:18 PM EDT, Amp Guy Llc <kb1sel@...> wrote:
Keep playing dumb Correction (calculations)auto correct On 2024-03-10 18:20, Peter Voelpel wrote: > Whats your problem? > I don?t know what you mean with Carla. > > This thread is about Pi-L networks, not about anything you do. > > 73 > > -----Original-Nachricht----- > Betreff: Re: [ham-amplifiers] High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L > network (Alpha 78) > Datum: 2024-03-10T23:31:48+0100 > Von: "Amp Guy Llc" <kb1sel@...> > An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > The site jim uses provided the input and output network Carla’s for the > 3x6 10kw pa and were? dead nuts on. > > Has also been used for more pa’s then I can count in the past. > > Peter I’m starting to think you’re the kinda guy that just won’t admit > they are wrong. > > Seems like you are going out of your way to put down how we have > decided > to build this current pa. > > I already own 98 percent of the parts I’m using including the re > purposed cabinet. I’m fitting components of ample rating to support 100 > percent duty cycle with minimal cost out of pocket. > > 73 > > > > > > > On 2024-03-10 12:38, Peter Voelpel wrote: >> Hi Jim, >> >> I use the formulas by Eimac and also the PIEL software depending on >> what computer I use. >> >> My values for the anode capacitors are the total values. >> >> Any strays and tube capacitance etc. as well as inductor lead length >> are not taken into account. >> >> I guess you deducted capacitances like that of the tube from your >> figures. >> >> The current through the coil of the pi part is indeed Q*Ia where you >> used 3.2 and not 6. >> >> With a Q of 6 the current is 6*.2.75A= 16.5A. >> >> You also used different frequencies, I used 1.8 and 7MHz but that will >> not change much. >> >> I am operator at the M/M contest station DR1A so familiar with >> fighting harmonics. >> >> But how many stubs will you connect to a multiband amplifier? >> >> A single stub will kill some harmonics but not sufficient enough, we >> use cacaded stubs made from LDF cable behind the mono band amplifiers. >> >> >> I measured a YC-179 bolted to the chassis. >> >> 73 >> >> Peter >> >>? And this is copper after >40 years: >> >> -----Original-Nachricht----- >> >> Betreff: Re: [ham-amplifiers] High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L >> network (Alpha 78) >> >> Datum: 2024-03-10T16:29:32+0100 >> >> Von: "Jim VE7RF" <jim.thom@...> >> >> An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 10:46 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote: >> >>> Sorry Jim, >>> >>> I can?t follow your calculations and for what reason a Q of <8 >>> should not be possible on 40m. >>> >>> Lets assume a YC179 with 6kV on the anode and 2.75A anode current. >>> >>> Tube output impedance will be 1.1kOhm at 10kW. >>> >>> Pi-L intermediate impedance 200 ohms. >>> >>> Coil currents will be about 15A. >>> >>> Example for 160 and 40m at a Q of 6. >>> >>> 160m: >>> >>> Ca 350pf, La 29?H, Cb 1500pf, Lb 7.65?H >>> >>> 40m: >>> >>> Ca 90pf, La 7.5?H, Cb 380pf, Lb 1.97?H >>> >>> 3CX6000A7 has 12pf less output capacitance, at 6kV output impedance >>> will be lower then 1.1kOhm as current will be higher and therefore >>> La smaller , I guess a Q of 6 will be possible even on 20m with a >>> Pi-L. >>> >>> The whole tube family does not need a harmonic suppressor. >>> >>> Harmonics of SSB signals can be copied. Once I did the CQ 160m >>> contest and were phoned by a ham 120km away, he found my signal in >>> the 80m dx window. >>> >>> Copper / copper tubing is very expensive nowadays here and silver >>> plating does nothing on HF. >>> >>> I get more then 7 Euros for 1kg scrap copper like LDF cable >>> leftovers. >>> >>> 73 >>> >>> Peter >> >> ##? I just? plugged ur? YC-179 numbers into the GM3SEK PI-L software. >>? The YC-179 has 35 pf anode to grid C... which rises to 52 pf with >> grid flange bolted to chassis. I also allowed for an extra 5 pf of >> stray C on top of the 52 pf..( so a total of 57 pf used).? ? I also >> used ur 6 kv loaded @ 2.75 amps...and also used? your? 200 ohm image >> Z....and also ur? 61% eff, and used 1840 khz for the design freq. >> And also used a 400 uh plate choke.? And also used ur 1100 ohm plate >> load Z....and also ur 10 kw output. >> >> ##? This is what it spits out...for a total network Q of 6.? ( Input Q >> = 3.2? Output? Q = 1.0? L network Q =? 1.7 )? Coil current in L1 >> should be input Q X plate current or 3.2 x 2.75 =? 8.8 amps. >> C1- 215.7 pf >> L1 - 35.53 uh >> C2 - 1198.2 pf >> L2-? 7.49 uh >> >> The above is not even close to ur calcs.? ( Ca 350pf, La 29?H, Cb >> 1500pf, Lb 7.65?H )? What are u using for software ??? >> >> ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. >> >> >> Ok, let's try 40m (7150 khz)? and again using your numbers. >> C1-? 9.6 pf >> L1 -? 9.14 uh >> C2 -? 308.3 pf >> L2 -? 1.93 uh >> >> Again, not even close to your numbers.? ? ( Ca 90pf, La 7.5?H, Cb >> 380pf, Lb 1.97?H? )? What are u using for making ur calcs ?????? >> >> A 1/4 wave shorted stub will kill all the even harmonics.... by 15-23 >> db.? Try listening to urself on a 2nd RX on the 2nd, 3rd, 4th >> harmonics..... while Tx'ing on SSB.? Say TX on LSB / USB on 7100, then >> listen on 14.200 and 21.300 and 28.400 mhz. >> >> Flexible Copper tubing has risen a bit in price, but is still >> relatively cheap.? Typ comes in 10'- 15' - 25'- 50' rolls.? And in >> 1/8"? to? 1.125" OD sizes....and every size in between. >> >> I hate the look of bare copper,? which really looks bad after several >> years.? The silver plating is cheap, and is strictly an aesthetic >> thing.? ? >> >> >> Links: >> ------ >> [1] /g/ham-amplifiers/message/40324 >> [2] /mt/104698543/8135091 >> [3] /g/ham-amplifiers/post >> [4] /g/ham-amplifiers/editsub/8135091 >> [5] >> /g/ham-amplifiers/leave/12941173/8135091/773995006/xyzzy > > > > > > ? > > > |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
Keep playing dumb
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Correction (calculations)auto correct On 2024-03-10 18:20, Peter Voelpel wrote:
Whats your problem? |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
Whats your problem?
I don?t know what you mean with Carla. This thread is about Pi-L networks, not about anything you do. 73 -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: Re: [ham-amplifiers] High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78) Datum: 2024-03-10T23:31:48+0100 Von: "Amp Guy Llc" <kb1sel@...> An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> The site jim uses provided the input and output network Carla’s for the 3x6 10kw pa and were dead nuts on. Has also been used for more pa’s then I can count in the past. Peter I’m starting to think you’re the kinda guy that just won’t admit they are wrong. Seems like you are going out of your way to put down how we have decided to build this current pa. I already own 98 percent of the parts I’m using including the re purposed cabinet. I’m fitting components of ample rating to support 100 percent duty cycle with minimal cost out of pocket. 73 On 2024-03-10 12:38, Peter Voelpel wrote: Hi Jim, ? |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
The site jim uses provided the input and output network Carla’s for the 3x6 10kw pa and were dead nuts on.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Has also been used for more pa’s then I can count in the past. Peter I’m starting to think you’re the kinda guy that just won’t admit they are wrong. Seems like you are going out of your way to put down how we have decided to build this current pa. I already own 98 percent of the parts I’m using including the re purposed cabinet. I’m fitting components of ample rating to support 100 percent duty cycle with minimal cost out of pocket. 73 On 2024-03-10 12:38, Peter Voelpel wrote:
Hi Jim, |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
??
? ? ?Good day Group., ? ?Well Jim and Peter I've extrapolated the 350 and 90 pf values with Peter's frequencies for the C1 values, which show that Peter's value for the Q1 on GM3SEK's spreadsheet is 4.35. No computers were damaged making these calculations. Only a 30 year old number cruncher. I wonder if Arturo in Buenos Aires has been keeping Tabs on all of this. HI. 73 de Michael G3TCA., =================== |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
开云体育Hi Jim, ? I use the formulas by Eimac and also the PIEL software depending on what computer I use. My values for the anode capacitors are the total values. Any strays and tube capacitance etc. as well as inductor lead length are not taken into account. I guess you deducted capacitances like that of the tube from your figures. ? The current through the coil of the pi part is indeed Q*Ia where you used 3.2 and not 6. With a Q of 6 the current is 6*.2.75A= 16.5A. ? You also used different frequencies, I used 1.8 and 7MHz but that will not change much. ? I am operator at the M/M contest station DR1A so familiar with fighting harmonics. But how many stubs will you connect to a multiband amplifier? ? A single stub will kill some harmonics but not sufficient enough, we use cacaded stubs made from LDF cable behind the mono band amplifiers. ? I measured a YC-179 bolted to the chassis. ? 73 Peter ? ? ?And this is copper after >40 years: ? ? -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: Re: [ham-amplifiers] High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78) Datum: 2024-03-10T16:29:32+0100 Von: "Jim VE7RF" <jim.thom@...> An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> ? ? ? On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 10:46 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote: ?
##? I just? plugged ur? YC-179 numbers into the GM3SEK PI-L software.? ?The YC-179 has 35 pf anode to grid C... which rises to 52 pf with grid flange bolted to chassis. I also allowed for an extra 5 pf of stray C on top of the 52 pf..( so a total of 57 pf used).? ? ?I also used ur 6 kv loaded @ 2.75 amps...and also used? your? 200 ohm image Z....and also ur? 61% eff, and used 1840 khz for the design freq.? ?And also used a 400 uh plate choke.? And also used ur 1100 ohm plate load Z....and also ur 10 kw output.?? ##? This is what it spits out...for a total network Q of 6.? ( Input Q = 3.2? Output? Q = 1.0? ?L network Q =? 1.7 )? ?Coil current in L1? should be input Q X plate current or 3.2 x 2.75 =? 8.8 amps.? ? The above is not even close to ur calcs.? (?Ca 350pf, La 29?H, Cb 1500pf, Lb 7.65?H )? ?What are u using for software ???? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Ok, let's try 40m (7150 khz)? and again using your numbers.? A 1/4 wave shorted stub will kill all the even harmonics.... by 15-23 db.? Try listening to urself on a 2nd RX on the 2nd, 3rd, 4th harmonics..... while Tx'ing on SSB.? Say TX on LSB / USB on 7100, then listen on 14.200 and 21.300 and 28.400 mhz.? ? Flexible Copper tubing has risen a bit in price, but is still relatively cheap.? Typ comes in 10'- 15' - 25'- 50' rolls.? And in 1/8"? to? 1.125" OD sizes....and every size in between.?? I hate the look of bare copper,? which really looks bad after several years.? ?The silver plating is cheap, and is strictly an aesthetic? thing.? |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 10:46 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote:
##? I just? plugged ur? YC-179 numbers into the GM3SEK PI-L software.? ?The YC-179 has 35 pf anode to grid C... which rises to 52 pf with grid flange bolted to chassis. I also allowed for an extra 5 pf of stray C on top of the 52 pf..( so a total of 57 pf used).? ? ?I also used ur 6 kv loaded @ 2.75 amps...and also used? your? 200 ohm image Z....and also ur? 61% eff, and used 1840 khz for the design freq.? ?And also used a 400 uh plate choke.? And also used ur 1100 ohm plate load Z....and also ur 10 kw output.?? ##? This is what it spits out...for a total network Q of 6.? ( Input Q = 3.2? Output? Q = 1.0? ?L network Q =? 1.7 )? ?Coil current in L1? should be input Q X plate current or 3.2 x 2.75 =? 8.8 amps.? ? The above is not even close to ur calcs.? (?Ca 350pf, La 29?H, Cb 1500pf, Lb 7.65?H )? ?What are u using for software ???? ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Ok, let's try 40m (7150 khz)? and again using your numbers.? A 1/4 wave shorted stub will kill all the even harmonics.... by 15-23 db.? Try listening to urself on a 2nd RX on the 2nd, 3rd, 4th harmonics..... while Tx'ing on SSB.? Say TX on LSB / USB on 7100, then listen on 14.200 and 21.300 and 28.400 mhz.? ? Flexible Copper tubing has risen a bit in price, but is still relatively cheap.? Typ comes in 10'- 15' - 25'- 50' rolls.? And in 1/8"? to? 1.125" OD sizes....and every size in between.?? I hate the look of bare copper,? which really looks bad after several years.? ?The silver plating is cheap, and is strictly an aesthetic? thing.? |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
开云体育Sorry Jim, ? I can?t follow your calculations and for what reason a Q of <8 should not be possible on 40m. ? Lets assume a YC179 with 6kV on the anode and 2.75A anode current. Tube output impedance will be 1.1kOhm at 10kW. Pi-L intermediate impedance 200 ohms. Coil currents will be about 15A. ? Example for 160 and 40m at a Q of 6. ? 160m: ? Ca 350pf, La 29?H, Cb 1500pf, Lb 7.65?H ? 40m: ? Ca 90pf, La 7.5?H, Cb 380pf, Lb 1.97?H ? 3CX6000A7 has 12pf less output capacitance, at 6kV output impedance will be lower then 1.1kOhm as current will be higher and therefore La smaller , I guess a Q of 6 will be possible even on 20m with a Pi-L. ? The whole tube family does not need a harmonic supressor. ? Harmonics of SSB signals can be copied. Once I did the CQ 160m contest and were phoned by a ham 120km away, he found my signal in the 80m dx window. ? Copper / copper tubing is very expensive nowadays here and silver plating does nothing on HF. I get more then 7 Euros for 1kg scrap copper like LDF cable leftovers.? ? 73 Peter ? ? ? ? -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: Re: [ham-amplifiers] High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78) Datum: 2024-03-09T21:33:32+0100 Von: "Jim VE7RF" <jim.thom@...> An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> ? ? ? On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 07:47 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote: ?
##? Nice try....still does not work on 40-10m.? On 40m, min overall network Q that can be used with a PI-L? is? 8? ? (This is all based on having the MIN C1 being at least 14 pf).? ? Your concept will work on 160m, with the lowest Q being? 5.... albeit? 56.65 uh required....which is looney tunes.? That would require a? huge chunk of? 8/10 ga? airdux.? ?
|
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 07:47 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote:
##? Nice try....still does not work on 40-10m.? On 40m, min overall network Q that can be used with a PI-L? is? 8? ? (This is all based on having the MIN C1 being at least 14 pf).? ? Your concept will work on 160m, with the lowest Q being? 5.... albeit? 56.65 uh required....which is looney tunes.? That would require a? huge chunk of? 8/10 ga? airdux.? Your concept will work on 80m, with the lowest Q being? 5....albeit? 27.35 uh required.? Then u still have that stupid L coil that has to be bandswitched...which requires one extra wafer....and it needs to be 1/4"? tubing.? The bigger tubing would still be required on 40 -10m.? ? I can understand the concept, and tested it on the bench.? But the bench tests jive 100% with the software.? ?The problem is, the 3x6 tube has? 42 pf? (between anode to grid)...and the above calcs are also? using the extra .6 uh pre-coil installed too.? With that removed, it all gets much worse.? I checked my old notes.... and years ago thought.....'why not use a PI-L, but with a lot lower Q'.? Nice try on my part, but it does not work with the 3x3 /10/15/20.? ?All those tubes have too much anode to grid C when installed in the socket.? It works on the alpha table top amps.... (on 80-15m only) with the small tubes they used, which have very low anode to grid C.? And that pre-coil trick only works? on tubes that do NOT require a parasitic suppressor.? ? The best I can come up with? is the simple PI network, with the Q of 9 on all bands.? ?The tube already has 6 db of 2nd harmonic attenuation ..then toss in the? slightly higher tuned input Q, and? the output tank Q of 9,? trust me, harmonic suppression is more than adequate.? ?Then toss in the ants provide an additional 9-13 db of harmonic attenuation.? On? SSB, the 2nd harmonic will be double the BW. ( 6 khz).? ?3rd is? 9 khz .? 4th is 12 khz.? ?Nobody can copy harmonics of ssb signals.? On 40m ssb, all the harmonics are not only? stretched, they are also on the wrong sideband.? If on any freq > 7175 khz, the 2nd harmonic is above 20m band.? ?Side note, copper tubing in? 1/4" - 3/8" - 1/2"? is cheap? in the plumbing section of Home depot? ( aisle 16).? Cheap to silver plate too...with the cool-amp goop.? End of rant.? ? Jim? VE7RF |
12 KW CCS ON 160-15M....USING THE 3CX-6000A7..... Part 13
Here the complex chain drive is finalized. Spur gears used on the inside of the inner front panel.
The idea of the 3 x chains is to get the tune + load turns counters, and the bandswitch knob located in the correct positions on the outer panel. After some preliminary attempts, this latest version works good...and the front panel simply sides off....leaving all 3 x chains intact. On a side note, I shipped the new 397 uh plate choke today, along with a pair of .01uf @ 30 kv disc caps, used for bypassing at the cold end of the plate choke....used for the lower bands. A pair of 500 pf doorknobs will also be used at cold end of same plate choke...for bypassing at the upper bands. A pair of 100 amp supercon panel jacks also shipped. It's slowly coming together. This chain drive setup complicates things quite a bit, and required a lot of head scratching. But it's finally done...and works. The mapping has yet to be done (turns counter markings vs actual pf) for the tune + load caps. Once done, the mapping....aka .....'cheat sheets' can be made up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3zf2PrzJs0 |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
开云体育As already mentioned, the physical size of L and C is meant with smaller of course. And a Q of 5-6 with Pi-L is sufficient where 9 with a simple Pi might not be sufficient for harmonic supression. ? With Pi-L you don?t need 1/2" coil tubing and multiple band switch sections in parallel with a 3CX6K ? 73 Peter ? ? ? ? -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: Re: [ham-amplifiers] High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78) Datum: 2024-03-08T18:56:21+0100 Von: "Jim VE7RF" <jim.thom@...> An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> ? ? ? On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 11:02 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote: ?
## Not quite.? In software, or in Orr's books, on any PI-L,? BOTH the C1 and C2 caps are a lot lower value, BUT the main Coil ('L1')? is one helluva lot bigger in value. Coil has to be a lot bigger in value, since the C1 tune cap is a LOT smaller in value.? ? ?In the GM3SEK? PI / PI-L software, he uses a specific common? formulae to?arrive at the ...'image Z'.... that the PI-L initially transforms the plate load Z? down to....and is typ in the 200-400 ohm range.? Then the 200-400 ohms is transformed down to 50 ohms.? On the software? spreadsheet, the actual image Z can be manually changed to anything you want... like 100-1000 ohms.? ? ?
|
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 11:02 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote:
## Not quite.? In software, or in Orr's books, on any PI-L,? BOTH the C1 and C2 caps are a lot lower value, BUT the main Coil ('L1')? is one helluva lot bigger in value. Coil has to be a lot bigger in value, since the C1 tune cap is a LOT smaller in value.? ? ?In the GM3SEK? PI / PI-L software, he uses a specific common? formulae to?arrive at the ...'image Z'.... that the PI-L initially transforms the plate load Z? down to....and is typ in the 200-400 ohm range.? Then the 200-400 ohms is transformed down to 50 ohms.? On the software? spreadsheet, the actual image Z can be manually changed to anything you want... like 100-1000 ohms.? ? ###? In both the ORR book? and GM3SEK software, the Q remains the same for both the PI and also PI-L.? Done that way, the harmonic suppression is substantially increased by using the PI-L config.? BUT the C1 + C2 values are much reduced? vs the PI ( using the same loaded tank Q)..and the main Coil (L1) is increased substantially.? ## here's the rub.? Use the PI-L config, then reduce the Q by a bunch, the C1 + C2 values? become even smaller still, BUT the main coil..L1, become even bigger in value...too big.? So you end up with a huge main coil value, but less current through it, and degraded harmonic suppression ( but still adequate), and you still have the 2nd coil (L2) to install, and tap the 2nd coil...pita.? ? ##? after running all of this several times through software, and actually testing it on the bench, I came to the conclusion, the PI-L was a wasted effort.? It's easy to test on the bench. PI or PI-L built on a spare sheet of aluminum, with a resistor on input side ( to simulate the tube's plate load Z)...and an analyzer plugged into output side.? Both caps are individually mapped out beforehand? for fractional turns on turns counter vs pf.? Calculated coil values are done via lcr meter, and taps done in the correct spots.? ?If a roller used, the fractional turns are 1st mapped out? vs turns counter.? ? ##? with tune + load caps tweaked for 1:1 swr, then compared to the mapping cheat sheet...they always come out dead on, or within? a few pf.? ? Below is what the software spits out for PI, and also a PI-L? using 2 x different loaded Q values.?? ? ##? ?3x6 tube. 7 kv loaded @ 2.5 amps.? 1.8 mhz.? ?68% eff.? PO = 11.9 kw? ?Plate load Z = 1556 ohms.? ?400 uh plate choke used. For the PI network only, the overall network Q = 12? ?( Input Q= 10.4 )? ( output Q = 1.6)? Note Overall network Q =? input Q + output Q.? In the older arrl books, and also EIMAC, they only used the INPUT Q...and a value of 10 was common.? These days, they use total network Q...and use a value of? 12.? ?In software, only the overall network Q can be changed (but the input + output Q values are also spat out lower down in the results.? ##? FOR the PI-L config only, the overall Input Q is?also 12. (? PI network portion input Q = 9.9).? Input Q1 = 7.0? Output Q2 = 2.8? L network QL = 2.1? ? PI-L config? Same overall network Q of 12? 1.8 mhz.? C1 =? 370 pf ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. OK, now let's reduce the overall network Q down to 9.? C1= 423.4 pf ? PI-L config. Overall? network Q of 9 ? Ok, notice a few things here. You folks have any idea how big the 1/4" tubing coil for the 160m portion of the tank circuit has to be? when? sky high values of L1 are used ???? ?Hint, it's just not happening.? ? On Scotts latest 160-15m amp, I used a simple PI, and used an overall network Q of just 9.....on all bands.? ( see the PI config with the lower Q). C1= 423.4 pf Done that way, his ceramic? 12-500 pf (@ 15 kv rated) vac tune cap will easily suffice for the C1 tune cap. Actual vac cap measures 12-540 pf...and they are small things.? Calculated value required at 1.8 mhz = 423.4 pf. ( vs 563.4 pf if the higher Q is used). ? His tank circuit? consists of a total of 3 x tubing coils used.? Of course, in normal operation the? required 19.12 uh for 160m consist of the total of all 3 x coils in series being used.? So the actual 1/4" tubing coil for 160m is a lot lower value than 19.12 uh? ( it's 10 uh)? ? NOTE, when a PI-L used, on the upper bands, like 20m-10m, you can't use the lower Q value,? even with the .6 uh pre-coil installed.? The C1 values end up negative pf.? The only fix is to increase the loaded Q a lot higher than 12.? This is the problem when using large metal tubes on upper HF..( with the 24.5 pf anode to grid C on a 3x6...which rises to 42 pf, when tube plugged into the grid ring. The extra 18 pf? comes from the proximity of the lower anode fins, to the chassis below em.? ? The PI-L values? ?don't work on upper HF...unless the Q is increased by a bunch.? ? On the simple PI network? I designed in software, a loaded Q of 9 can be used...... including 15m. It's a 160-80-40-20-15m amp.? ?The .6uh pre-coil is used so the lower Q can be used on 15m.? ?The tube's 42 pf of anode to grid C plus the .6 uh coil, form a step down L network.? That steps down the 1556 ohms plate load Z....down to just 487 ohms on 21.225 mhz.? Ok, now a practical? PI network can be used, with reasonable values.? Harmonic suppression is ample. On upper HF, with the extra pre-coil installed it's sometimes called a L-PI? (or a L-PI-L, if a PI-L used) .? Harmonic suppression on the lower bands is more than ample. W8JI sez he measured? 50 db of? 2nd harmonic suppression on an AL-1200? on 40m...(and even more on 3rd and 4th harmonics).? ?That amp uses a simple PI network on 40-10m.? JI sez the only reason they used a PI-L on 160+80m on that amp is so smaller tune and load caps could be used.? Trade off is, he still had to pad both the tune + load caps, and use a toroid on low bands.? Exact same, identical network used on the AL-1500 + AL-1200.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? |
Re: High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78)
开云体育Pi-L is great. Not only the capacitors become smaller in size also the coils and band switch can be made much smaller with that far lower current through them. ? 73 Peter ? ? ? -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: Re: [ham-amplifiers] High Temperature in Toroid of the PI-L network (Alpha 78) Datum: 2024-03-07T20:03:28+0100 Von: "W7WRX" <clark@...> An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> ? ? ? Great Info Jim, I thought the main purpose of a Pi-L is to use a smaller C2?? ? If you have that L then C2 goes way down in value.? ?On the Henry you need to make absolutely sure that L is tuned correctly.? If not power and IMD suffer greatly.? Its a real compromise.? If you tune that L for one Band you gain huge power and EFF.? But then, All other bands are screwed up.? Its a balancing act to cover all the bands.? I also enjoy moving the roller inductor around to experiment. You are absolutely correct that the lower Q does make more power and runs cooler.? Standard procedure for me is to step that roller a small amount at time and retune the caps.? There is a point where you hit pay dirt and anything more or less makes less power.? IMD does suffer slightly but I have never seen a major effect.? Also one thing to note This same thing happens with the C2 loading.? If you step that up or down by a fixed amount and retune C1, you can again find the exact spot where the amp is at max power and EFF.? ?Its a mountain and you fall off on each side of that magic spot. Some amps, this has little to no effect, like an SB220. But other amps, this method has a HUGE effect, Example would be a Henry 2k4.? ?If you attempt to just peak the tune and load you will never ever get the PI net in the right spot.? Stepping the load and going back to tune is the only way.? The effect is dramatic.? I always wondered why this was and assumed it was due to the Q.?? C |