On Nov 9, 2006, at 2:17 PM, David C. Hallam wrote:
Tony Wrote
I'd be interested in the article (wonder why ARRL puts good technical
articles in QEX instead of QST?) but I don't see huge rheostats for
filaments either.
I think that is fairly obvious. Most hams today wouldn't understand them
and don't care, and the ARRL can make more money selling another magazine.
As I understand it, the last reason is correct. In the first and last article I wrote for QEX, the ARRL's copy-editor added 5 technical errors to my manuscript.
David
KC2JD
R L Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734
r@..., , rlm@..., www.somis.org
