It's also funny that when I asked on the amps reflector if Rich had been
kicked off, Tom wrote back to me the reasons he was kicked off for, before it
ever showed up on the reflector that he was gone. The admin guy didn't answer me
until the next day.? If the admin guy is not Tom, then he must be helping
the admin guy censor.?
On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:45 AM, Mike((W5UC)) &
Kathy((K5MWH)) wrote:
> Pete, I guess you do what you think you must
do, BUT, I have a lot? > of trouble with the idea that someone
operates an ¡°open¡± forum and? > feels the need to hide.? That
concept really bothers me.? I post my? > name and callsign
every time I post to a reflector, and I am very? > suspicious
about the intentions of someone who feels the need to? > hide in
the shadows.
Amen, Mike.? I found it curious that Tom knew the
reasons why I got? "unsubscribed" / jackbooted from AMPS without the
reasons having been? posted. > > >
73, > > Mike, W5UC > > > > > >
From: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroupscom?
> [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...] On Behalf Of Pete
Smith > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:26 AM > To: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroupscom >
Subject: Re: [ham_amplifiers]
Censorship/Administrator > > > > I am going to respect
his anonymity. > > 73, Pete N4ZR > > At 08:32 AM
9/20/2006, Jan Erik Holm wrote: > >OK it isn?t W8JI, who is
it? > > > >73 SM2EKM >
>-------------------------------------- > >Pete Smith
wrote: > >> This may be my first and last post on this list, but I
wanted to? > clear > >> a few misconceptions: >
>> > >> Tom Rausch is not the Admin of Amps. I'm not either
;^) > >> > >> W4AN was not a fan of free speech - he
replaced me as Admin of > >> Towertalk when I refused to censor
posts there; this is not a? > knock on > >> Bill, just
a difference of philosophy. > >> > >> I run a local
community affairs mailing list with only two rules? > -
sign > >> your real name and maintain basic civility - keep
it? > substantive, not > >> personal. In 6 years, I've
had to ban one person for a week. A > >> parallel list has no such
rules, and has disintegrated into ugly? > name- > >>
calling. > >> > >>>From what I have read, such a
regime on amps would have worked? > pretty > >> well,
though the Admin would have had to ban a few people. > >> >
>> 73, Pete Smith N4ZR > >> > > >
> > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >