¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Censorship/Administrator


RICHARD GEORGE
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

It's also funny that when I asked on the amps reflector if Rich had been kicked off, Tom wrote back to me the reasons he was kicked off for, before it ever showed up on the reflector that he was gone. The admin guy didn't answer me until the next day.? If the admin guy is not Tom, then he must be helping the admin guy censor.?

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ham_amplifiers] Censorship/Administrator


On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:45 AM, Mike((W5UC)) & Kathy((K5MWH)) wrote:

> Pete, I guess you do what you think you must do, BUT, I have a lot?
> of trouble with the idea that someone operates an ¡°open¡± forum and?
> feels the need to hide.? That concept really bothers me.? I post my?
> name and callsign every time I post to a reflector, and I am very?
> suspicious about the intentions of someone who feels the need to?
> hide in the shadows.

Amen, Mike.? I found it curious that Tom knew the reasons why I got?
"unsubscribed" / jackbooted from AMPS without the reasons having been?
posted.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Mike, W5UC
>
>
>
>
>
> From: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroupscom?
> [mailto:ham_amplifiers@...] On Behalf Of Pete Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:26 AM
> To: ham_amplifiers@yahoogroupscom
> Subject: Re: [ham_amplifiers] Censorship/Administrator
>
>
>
> I am going to respect his anonymity.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
> At 08:32 AM 9/20/2006, Jan Erik Holm wrote:
> >OK it isn?t W8JI, who is it?
> >
> >73 SM2EKM
> >--------------------------------------
> >Pete Smith wrote:
> >> This may be my first and last post on this list, but I wanted to?
> clear
> >> a few misconceptions:
> >>
> >> Tom Rausch is not the Admin of Amps. I'm not either ;^)
> >>
> >> W4AN was not a fan of free speech - he replaced me as Admin of
> >> Towertalk when I refused to censor posts there; this is not a?
> knock on
> >> Bill, just a difference of philosophy.
> >>
> >> I run a local community affairs mailing list with only two rules?
> - sign
> >> your real name and maintain basic civility - keep it?
> substantive, not
> >> personal. In 6 years, I've had to ban one person for a week. A
> >> parallel list has no such rules, and has disintegrated into ugly?
> name-
> >> calling.
> >>
> >>>From what I have read, such a regime on amps would have worked?
> pretty
> >> well, though the Admin would have had to ban a few people.
> >>
> >> 73, Pete Smith N4ZR
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
r@...





?
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
???

<*> Your email settings:
??? Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
???
??? (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
??? mailto:ham_amplifiers-digest@...
??? mailto:ham_amplifiers-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
??? ham_amplifiers-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
???
?


Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.