Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
The /168 console (like the 158 & later) didn't have very many blinky lights. As I recall, just the five above the Interrupt, Start, Stop, Load buttons. So, the "not" microfiche viewer was the
By
William Denton
·
#6144
·
|
Re: #VMCE #rexx EE goes XEDIT - compiling a wish list
#VMCE
#rexx
How important are the "side modes" of EE like FSLIST and FSVIEW ? I did not care of these up to now. I have reworked EE focussed on XEDIT as it was in VM/SP 1 (that means no FILELIST, RDRLIST ...).
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#6143
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
By
Dave Wade
·
#6142
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Dave Wade wrote: [...] You don't?! Wow. Just... wow. Which, when eliminated, would free up those registers for other uses. Which, when replaced with relative instructions that don't need base
By
Fish Fish
·
#6141
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
By
Dave Wade
·
#6140
·
|
Re: What is special about the 3066?
[email protected]> wrote: It was interesting from both the hardware and software points of view. I understand that the hardware was based on a stripped down 2250 with no actual graphics
By
Tony Harminc
·
#6139
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Dave Wade wrote: Yes, you're right: it would. Oh well. Just a thought. -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories http://www.softdevlabs.com mail: fish@...
By
Fish Fish
·
#6138
·
|
What is special about the 3066?
Not wanting to highjack the "[h390-vm] Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal" thread. What was unique about the 3066? I understand it was the integrated console for the /165 and /168, but what unique
By
Doug Wegscheid
·
#6137
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Fish, I would prefer not to do this as I believe it would stop VM/CE running on my P/390. Dave
By
Dave Wade
·
#6136
·
|
Re: XNET v1.4.1
If you tackle the SMSG, then we wouldn't need commands in the CONFIG, as
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#6135
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Hello, How about following IBM and splitting the module into two? Just a thought. [email protected]> wrote:
By
Bertram Moshier
·
#6134
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
I've been following this thread with interest, so allow me to offer what may be, while somewhat radical, a nevertheless viable solution: Require your Hercules control file to have a "FACILITY ENABLE
By
Fish Fish
·
#6133
·
|
Re: XNET v1.4.1
Mark, Having a heartbeat really wouldn't help matters much for detecting that a system on the other side has gone away.? The main problem is really the nature of CTCE devices on Hercules.? When one
By
Bob Polmanter
·
#6132
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Tony, If you look at the link I sent to the VMSHARE archives :- http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=DMKGRF <http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=DMKGRF&ft=PROB&args=dmkgrf+split#hit>
By
Dave Wade
·
#6131
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
On Sun, 22 Sept 2024 at 17:19, Tony Harminc <tharminc@...> wrote: [...] > Some shops made a hardware mod to support the ENTER (or maybe it was CR) key as, well, an ENTER key. The 3066 as it came
By
Tony Harminc
·
#6130
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
[email protected]> wrote: Some shops made a hardware mod to support the ENTER (or maybe it was CR) key as, well, an ENTER key. The 3066 as it came required the operator to hit the separate and very
By
Tony Harminc
·
#6129
·
|
Re: Reserving Modification Numbers
Nicely done and THANK YOU! ... Mark S.
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#6128
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
I have played around with the ZOC TN3270 emulator, EE V1.2.5. could handle 200 columns and 81 lines at first glance. There were warning messages on exit about memory overwrites though. I have seen
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#6127
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
If this leads to dynamic screen sizes I am all for it. I already run it with a large screen size (c3270 localhost:3270 -model 3279-5 -oversize 159x48 -defaultfgbg) and the works quite nicely - for
By
[email protected]
·
#6126
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Bertram, Addressability and space in DMKGRF always was a problem. Well in 1985 at least one site removed the 3066 support. http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=DMKGRF
By
Dave Wade
·
#6125
·
|