This group is for all folks running the original IBM VM/370 Release 6 operating system (or later (e.g. VMTCE (Community Edition)) on Hercules. Like the other early IBM operating systems this version has always been in the public domain and so can be freely distributed. The base version as supplied by IBM is lacking in many facilities. IBM solved this by providing additional extension products which were licensed and so are not available. There are however many user enhancements available which can be installed. In addition, in order to get users up and running quickly updated "releases" of VM/370 included the most popular updates are available for download, so novices can start to learn VM without having to delve into the system internals. It is intended that this wiki will provide information on the base release and these updates.
The available versions are here :-
?
?
|
Re: ZORK on VM/370 CE ... POSSIBLE?
Greetings Alejandro, I cannot speak for pipes on CE, other than it does not exist. I¡¯m also actively working on getting Zork on CMS. The Zork version I have is from Moshix. Things to note: 1. Zork
By
Mike Rankin
·
#6340
·
|
|
ZORK on VM/370 CE ... POSSIBLE?
Hi forum and Merry Christmas! I've stumbled with some cached web contents that, apparently, may indicate that Zork ran on CMS under VM/370. Sure, I've taken that with a grain of salt... I've that
By
Alejandro olivan Alvarez
·
#6339
·
|
|
Re: CP PER and DISPLAY cmd interaction
What was I thinking... Should be this: #CP DISPLAY 8.10(12) or #CP PER I R E000.20 CMD D T0.20(11) or #CP DISPLAY 80-100(12) Just as easy to parse and much more intuitive cheers, William
By
William Denton
·
#6338
·
|
|
Re: CP PER and DISPLAY cmd interaction
Probably too late to suggest an alternate strategy... rather than the ";BASE=" syntax, update the DISPLAY command so the storage target would look more like an Assembler operand.. like this: Rather
By
William Denton
·
#6337
·
|
|
Re: CP PER and DISPLAY cmd interaction
Sounds good to me. I've needed the ; or similar and fixing it using x'100' or something like that, as you say, is safe, but weird. ... Mark S.
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#6336
·
|
|
Re: Anybody know where GCCSECT came from?
Folks, I have uploaded that to the GITHUB repository and created an issue Dave
By
Dave Wade
·
#6335
·
|
|
Re: Anybody know where GCCSECT came from?
I found one on the VM/370 Sixpack 1.2, not sure it is the right one. I have loaded it in the Files section. Cheers, Rene FERLAND, Montreal
By
Ren¨¦ Ferland
·
#6334
·
|
|
Re: Anybody know where GCCSECT came from?
Ross I can't find it either. Let me search on older disks. Might be a couple of days as the grand kids have been sent? home from school because of a smell and I am surrounded. Dave
By
Dave Wade
·
#6333
·
|
|
Anybody know where GCCSECT came from?
Does anybody know where the GCCCSECT MODULE on the VM/370 CE 1.1.2 Y-disk came from? It's a C program, but I can't find any source for it, and Google has never heard of it. There's a similar program
By
Ross Patterson
·
#6332
·
|
|
Second beta of bREXX 1.1.0 now available
The second beta release of bREXX v1.1.0 for CMS on VM/370 is now available at https://github.com/RossPatterson/CMS-370-BREXX/releases/download/v1.1.0-beta-02/BREXX.zip. I have been testing this update
By
Ross Patterson
·
#6331
·
|
|
Updated Wiki Page: Reserved CP Modification Numbers
#wiki-notice
The wiki page Reserved CP Modification Numbers ( /g/h390-vm/wiki/37734/214110 ) has been updated by Ross Patterson <ross.patterson@...>. Compare Revisions (
By
Group Notification <noreply@...>
·
#6330
·
|
|
CP PER and DISPLAY cmd interaction
I love that somebody added support in the CP DISPLAY command for base registers (*e.g.*, #CP DISPLAY 8.10;BASE12 to display 16 bytes starting at 8 bytes past wherever R12 points). But the CP PER
By
Ross Patterson
·
#6329
·
|
|
Updated Wiki Page: Reserved CMS Modification Numbers
#wiki-notice
The wiki page Reserved CMS Modification Numbers ( /g/h390-vm/wiki/37735/214106 ) has been updated by Ross Patterson <ross.patterson@...>. Compare Revisions (
By
Group Notification <noreply@...>
·
#6328
·
|
|
Re: RXSYSFN for VM/370
[email protected]> wrote: It might help future releases if the person who leads this one puts together a checklist of the tasks that go into releasing VM/370. As a newcomer to retrocomputing, I know
By
Ross Patterson
·
#6327
·
|
|
Re: RXSYSFN for VM/370
Yeah, EE (or any full-screen editor is important). Thank you for the update. [email protected]> wrote:
By
Bertram Moshier
·
#6326
·
|
|
Re: RXSYSFN for VM/370
Bertram, Not sure where we are! We lost the person who built the last version, so there is a bit of a void, but I think we are getting to the stage where there is enough new stuff for another release.
By
Dave Wade
·
#6325
·
|
|
Re: RXSYSFN for VM/370
Hello, Any idea or announcement, yet, as to the release of the next version of VM/CE? Thank you [email protected]> wrote:
By
Bertram Moshier
·
#6324
·
|
|
Re: DMSABE141T Protection exception
Best guess is different memory size of the guest VM or saved segment layout. You ought to be able to able to run PER to get an idea of what¡¯s causing the fault but it¡¯s been way too many years
By
Matthew T. Kromer
·
#6323
·
|
|
Re: Wondering ...
Try DMKCTC (real and virtual CTCA code), if it is in VM/CE. I know it was in VM/370 R3. The shop I was in ran multiple VMs (homegrown OS in them) talking to each other via CTC. Eventually they got
By
Thomas Kern
·
#6321
·
|
|
Re: Wondering ...
Bertram, There is no CTCA code in the base free RSCS. Not sure what is on CE. I can't see any mods Dave
By
Dave Wade
·
#6320
·
|