Probably too late to suggest an alternate strategy... rather than the ";BASE=" syntax, update the DISPLAY command so the storage target would look more like an Assembler operand.. like this:
?
Rather than:
? ? ?#CP DISPLAY 8.10;BASE12
maybe this:
? ? ?#CP DISPLAY 8(10,12)
?
Rather than:
? ? ?#CP PER I R E000.20 CMD D T0.20;BASE11
maybe this:
? ? ?#CP PER I R E000.20 CMD D T0(20,11)
?
Another way to handle ranges might be...
Rather than:
? ? ?#CP DISPLAY 80-100;BASE12
maybe this:
? ? ?#CP DISPLAY 8-100(12)
?
Just a thought... this is probably what the product design folks would have done if they had thought of it
?
cheers,WIlliam
