¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Announce: New VM/370 docker release 1.4.31
https://github.com/adesutherland/vm-370/releases/tag/v1.4.31 https://hub.docker.com/r/adriansutherland/vm370 Adrian
By adriansutherland67 · #2667 ·
Re: Browseable / Searchable Sources - #sixpack
Awesome!
By adriansutherland67 · #2666 ·
Re: What do we call it?
Hi Dave Interesting and very thorough - well done! I would just add from a pragmatic and commercial view (rather than a black & white technical perspective) it is for the rights owner (perhaps IBM) to
By adriansutherland67 · #2665 ·
Re: What do we call it?
(Sorry sent a bit quickly) Laird, I don¡¯t believe that IBM ever trademarked VM/370. They abandoned it as a product name a long time ago, when VM/SP came out. They really don¡¯t want modern
By Dave Wade · #2664 ·
Re: What do we call it?
Laird, I don¡¯t believe that IBM ever trademarked VM/370. I checked the current list of trademarks here:- Sent: 07 February 2021 15:25 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [h390-vm] What do we call it?
By Dave Wade · #2663 ·
Re: What do we call it?
Perhaps it is too confusingly similar to a trademarked product. Has IBM abandoned VM/370 yet? Has IBM abandoned its good-cop/BAD-cop business model yet? Nobody complained about 390 as I heard. There
By Laird Heal · #2662 ·
Re: What do we call it?
I like it too. Steen
By Steen Hansen · #2661 ·
Re: What do we call it?
sounds good to me
By Lucio · #2660 ·
Re: What do we call it?
Jim, Seeing as I have been creating the distributions its up to me. I am happy with that. I just need to get my backside off this chair and create something that¡¯s usable. Dave Sent: 07 February
By Dave Wade · #2659 ·
Re: What do we call it?
I like it. /Tom Kern
By Thomas Kern · #2658 ·
Re: What do we call it?
Does this work for every one? Renaming the 1.3 beta: VM/370 Community Edition V1R3M 0 It works for me. I guess the "shortest" form could be: VM/370 CE V1R3 *M0* Fine. Where do we stand on this
By Jim Snellen · #2657 ·
Re: Best VM turnkey package.
See Dave Wade's page... http://www.smrcc.org.uk/members/g4ugm/VM370.htm Joe
By Joe Monk · #2656 ·
Best VM turnkey package.
What would be the best turnkey package to download and run? VM370 of course, and where can I get it? Thanks. Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 7:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [h390-vm]
By Mike Ward · #2655 ·
Re: Browseable / Searchable Sources - #sixpack
I¡¯m using a GESHI Filter (GEneric Syntax HIlighter) [open source project] for all of the sources. ?It still needs to be tuned a bit but I¡¯m applying it to a bunch of different assembly language
By Steve Z · #2654 ·
Re: Browseable / Searchable Sources - #sixpack
Very cool! What's doing the source highlighting? Tony H.
By Tony Harminc · #2653 ·
Browseable / Searchable Sources - #sixpack
If anyone is interested in using a browser to view / search the sources (with all updates applied and the update histories) as distributed in the 1.3 Sixpack, it is provided here:
By Steve Z · #2652 ·
VM370 CMS VMEX - spreadsheet
I loaded up to github? ( https://github.com/tchandler48/vmex ) a working spreadsheet program.? It is not excel, but does a good job at a start.? Complete math parser, and about 10 builtin
By Tom Chandler · #2651 ·
Re: Interesting issue with SCANF and GCCLIB
Apologies - when I say fseek() I mean ftell()!
By adriansutherland67 · #2650 ·
Re: Interesting issue with SCANF and GCCLIB
Hi Dave Appreciate you may find this unhelpful but It works *fine-ish* on the latest version of CGGLIB. That said the scanf() implementation was not changed. Looking at the code, the reason that
By adriansutherland67 · #2649 ·
Interesting issue with SCANF and GCCLIB
Folks, There seems to be an issue with the GCCLIB and SCANF. So I have a simple 2-liner, printf() and scanf() but scanf errors. . seeing as scanf() can only be called for STDIN has any one any idea
By Dave Wade · #2648 ·