Re: System Maintenance - A thought.
?I use a separate mdisk as opposed to CMSUSER1, CMSUSER2, etc. It¡¯s been working so far but I¡¯m not opposed to having multiple userids. I¡¯d have the same issue of keeping track of what is
By
Jim Snellen
·
#2672
·
|
Re: System Maintenance - A thought.
Folks, Perhaps have a CMSUSER1, 2 3 & 4 perhaps? Dave Sent: 09 February 2021 17:50 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [h390-vm] System Maintenance - A thought. Dave, Bob, and others, Given we have
By
Dave Wade
·
#2671
·
|
Re: System Maintenance - A thought.
Dave, Bob, and others, Given we have much more storage on our PCs, today, than we did on mainframes, and that we can compress these 33xx drives, I would recommend we move towards one DASD per product.
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#2670
·
|
Re: System Maintenance - A thought.
Hi Dave, When you say "big disks" and "more smaller disks" are you referring to different device types than 3350, or just disks that are less filled? I like the idea of separating distribution disks
By
Bob Bolch
·
#2669
·
|
System Maintenance - A thought.
I was wondering about the current strategy of cramming everything onto the least possible number of packs and going to big disks. Would we be better off using more smaller disks so things could be
By
Dave Wade
·
#2668
·
|
Announce: New VM/370 docker release 1.4.31
https://github.com/adesutherland/vm-370/releases/tag/v1.4.31 https://hub.docker.com/r/adriansutherland/vm370 Adrian
By
adriansutherland67
·
#2667
·
|
Re: Browseable / Searchable Sources -
#sixpack
Awesome!
By
adriansutherland67
·
#2666
·
|
Re: What do we call it?
Hi Dave Interesting and very thorough - well done! I would just add from a pragmatic and commercial view (rather than a black & white technical perspective) it is for the rights owner (perhaps IBM) to
By
adriansutherland67
·
#2665
·
|
Re: What do we call it?
(Sorry sent a bit quickly) Laird, I don¡¯t believe that IBM ever trademarked VM/370. They abandoned it as a product name a long time ago, when VM/SP came out. They really don¡¯t want modern
By
Dave Wade
·
#2664
·
|
Re: What do we call it?
Laird, I don¡¯t believe that IBM ever trademarked VM/370. I checked the current list of trademarks here:- Sent: 07 February 2021 15:25 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [h390-vm] What do we call it?
By
Dave Wade
·
#2663
·
|
Re: What do we call it?
Perhaps it is too confusingly similar to a trademarked product. Has IBM abandoned VM/370 yet? Has IBM abandoned its good-cop/BAD-cop business model yet? Nobody complained about 390 as I heard. There
By
Laird Heal
·
#2662
·
|
Re: What do we call it?
I like it too. Steen
By
Steen Hansen
·
#2661
·
|
Re: What do we call it?
sounds good to me
By
Lucio
·
#2660
·
|
Re: What do we call it?
Jim, Seeing as I have been creating the distributions its up to me. I am happy with that. I just need to get my backside off this chair and create something that¡¯s usable. Dave Sent: 07 February
By
Dave Wade
·
#2659
·
|
Re: What do we call it?
I like it. /Tom Kern
By
Thomas Kern
·
#2658
·
|
Re: What do we call it?
Does this work for every one? Renaming the 1.3 beta: VM/370 Community Edition V1R3M 0 It works for me. I guess the "shortest" form could be: VM/370 CE V1R3 *M0* Fine. Where do we stand on this
By
Jim Snellen
·
#2657
·
|
Re: Best VM turnkey package.
See Dave Wade's page... http://www.smrcc.org.uk/members/g4ugm/VM370.htm Joe
By
Joe Monk
·
#2656
·
|
Best VM turnkey package.
What would be the best turnkey package to download and run? VM370 of course, and where can I get it? Thanks. Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 7:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [h390-vm]
By
Mike Ward
·
#2655
·
|
Re: Browseable / Searchable Sources -
#sixpack
I¡¯m using a GESHI Filter (GEneric Syntax HIlighter) [open source project] for all of the sources. ?It still needs to be tuned a bit but I¡¯m applying it to a bunch of different assembly language
By
Steve Z
·
#2654
·
|
Re: Browseable / Searchable Sources -
#sixpack
Very cool! What's doing the source highlighting? Tony H.
By
Tony Harminc
·
#2653
·
|