开云体育

The updated version of GCCLIB implements IO differently. For fixed record length files it supports random access (but only using C90 functions, not POSIX).

I do a lot of embedded work and *not* having/needing a full C runtime allows for writing the applications/OS/RTOS in an efficient manner. In many cases I compile my C code with --no-stdlib and the

That's why I like PL/I , the language includes I/O. C, sometimes can be very limitative, since lot of functions are not implemented the same way, And you have to write your own implementation. for

Folks, GCC only supports the "C90" standard library. lseek() is a UNIX specific interface and is not part of the "C90" standard. The C90 equivalent is fseek() but its very inefficient on CMS. The

Just being a bit pedantic, but there is nothing in the C language that specifies any of the stdio functions (such as lseek and such). Those are part of the standard "C" libraries and those are

I am working on some "C" code, and it appears that the gcc compiler does not support the lseek function.? Did I misread it or is there another option. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank You Tom c

<ferland.rene@...> wrote: Thanks René, that was perfect. All the best. Roxo -- ---------------- Non luctari, ludare -------------------+ WYSIWYG Fernando M. Roxo da Motta <mvs@...> |

Yes, but logoff is a CP command, so you need to type CP LOGOFF in your EXEC, not just LOGOFF Rene FERLAND, Montreal

Hi all, I am toying with execs in 6 Pack 1.3 and was testing to issue a LOGOFF in an exec. Like: EMIT ------------------------------------------------------------ EMIT LOGGING OFF NOW EMIT

It works because Hercules does/did not correctly emulate the default controller which I believe is a 3390. It is however possible to connect 3390 DASD to a 3380 controller which Hercules does emulate

Works for me. I have no strong preference between the shortened versions. The first seems more in the tradition of IBM product naming conventions, but the second keeps the “M0” part visible.

Errata: a friendly soul* Anyway, here goes the paste with the sensible corrections. https://pastebin.com/pLj1FagN

Well, it's now solved. A friendly sould gave me his copy of hercules.cnf for VM/ESA. Though his file worked, I wondered why mine didn't. So I found out why: # DASDs 0123 3390 $(DASD)/240RES.123

In the UK (and possibly other countries that had a ? currency, e.g. Malta) the “Pound Sign” is the ? which is a stylized “L” with bar through it, from the Latin “Libra”. I think

It is unless you are in the UK (or use international char sets) as that is the pound symbol (will try and show it but =? ?) We refer it (#) as well as as the hash symbol but I go back a bit :)

Of course the DMS-10 is a Canadian switch, so they would probably use the Canadian term current at the time. But certainly Nortel borrowed that from 1960s AT&T usage. Are we off-topic yet? Tony H.

I've always heard "#" referred to as the pound sign. Joe

Hi, Joe I've tried adding it back. But, as I suspected, that wasn't the problem. Also, it previously worked under z/VM. Also, from what I gather, VM/ESA doesn't seem to support QDIO/ETH. And that

I have heard the term before, but can't say from where. Totally off topic, but... In another world, I am an antique telephone collector and phone "switcher". I have 11,700 Bell System Practices

I have been involved in computers, (operating, programming, analysis, Test and DB management & Director for IT since 1963. In most of it the # symbol has been referred as hash for IBM, ICL, and a lot