Yes, that's quite correct.
Jay Maynard wrote:
> I apologize if I implied that SDL isn't about stability and
> correctness. It's just that it hangs out more on the bleeding
> edge of capability than Aethra is intended to, and has different
> development priorities.
Ah. Okay. That much is true, so apology accepted. :)
Would it be fair to say that Aethra is intended to be more focused on legacy guest operating systems whereas SDL is currently more focused on more modern guest operating systems? Yes? Would that be fair to say? I just want people to be clear regarding the difference between the two! Thanks.
--
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
Software Development Laboratories
mail: fish@...
