¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Issues running OS/360 MVT unter VM/SP 5


 

Jeff,

It looks most odd, as the time is also corrupted.

What happens if you change the order of the reply thus:-

R 0,'DATE=55.066,CLOCK=01.01.01,AUTO=N'

(that's the format in my notes for MVT).

Chris
--
<cjar1950@...>



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:09:31 -0800
"Jeff Snyder" <jsnyder1369@...> wrote:
Hi Uwe.? Using 28 years set the date back to 1995, which should have fit within MVT's sanity check for dates.? When I did that, MVT thought it was 1955.? I'm afraid if I go back any further, I might drop out of the early end of MVT's date range.

Using "YROFFSET -28":

VM says it's 1995
q t
14:47:30 TIME IS 14:47:30 PST TUESDAY 03/07/95
14:47:30 CONNECT= 00:04:23 VIRTCPU= 000:00.25 TOTCPU= 000:02.42

However the MVT guest thinks it's 1955!

| 00 IEE116A TOD CLOCK INVALID- REPLY WITH SET PARAMETERS
| R 00,'clock=01.01.01,date=95.057,auto=n'
| IEE600I REPLY TO 00 IS; 'clock=01.01.01,date=95.057,auto=n'
IEE118I SET PARAMETER(S) ACCEPTED
- D T
*IEE136I??? TIME=01.42.24?? DATE=55.066

* By the way, using 28 years works fine when running MVT directly under Hercules.? It's only when I try it under VM that it has issues.




Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.