This is a stellar thread! I'll add to the points about in-person/remote pairing and remote participants' representation, as I think it could be easy to get stuck in the technology and simple mechanics - which are essential but not sufficient. I wrote a listicle in 2019 about . This needs updating for the new world of work, but some points are still worth putting on your list. For example: 6. Name and empower an in-room advocate: As much as you design for remote inclusivity, it will still be challenging for a virtual participant to naturally interrupt, ask a question, make a suggestion. It may also be tough for them to get the attention of you, the facilitator, as you have so much going on! Unlike completely virtual collaboration, you are not sitting in front of your computer, so you may not be seeing the confused faces or text chats of remote participants. Name someone in the room who will be in charge of advocating for remote participants, and assign them specific advocacy duties. These duties could include items such as ensuring that they have access to all presentations and handouts, reading aloud from the text chats, and requesting that the facilitator call on a remote participant who wants to speak to the group. I'm eager to read more suggestions! Sarah Facilitator, Trainer, Coach, Learner? (Virtual & In-Person)??|?? Ed.M.,?Learning?&?Teaching?Program |?Harvard Graduate School of Education Associate Certified Coach (ACC) | Learning Travel Blogger ? | ??@sfnehrling On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 11:00 AM Eva Schiffer <eva-schiffer@...> wrote: Hi Alwin, |