Hi All, here is my experience with these tools over the past year.
Wonder.me represents people with their video at the top of the page and their photo in the center.? Moving yourself across the screen involves?clicking?on the part of the screen you want to go to and then your icon slides over there.
SpatialChat is simpler because the participant is represented only by a circle with their video in it.? To move yourself, you can drag yourself around.? We have found it to be quite?flexible for events where you want to move around and speak in small groups.? We embed it into a specific room inside a larger conference where the other rooms are using Zoom.
Remo is ideal for networking where people want to exchange business cards.? It's less fluid (there are seats to sit in on the screen) but it is simple enough for people to use the first time around.
For testing, you can use this? which weaves several of the tools listed (Wonder,?SpatialChat,?Kumospace,?Congregate,?WorkAdventure) into parallel breakout spaces, letting participants jump between them.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 4:13 PM Fernando Murray Loureiro via <fernandomurray=[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Guys!
I believe this group is the best one to ask about the alternative platforms for video-conference, specially the ones with these 'organic-fluid-natural¡¯ approach:
Some examples to get my point out:
(please add the other ones you know as well)
Some questions I have:
? What is your experience with these platforms?
? How structured/unstructured is the participants experience?
? How different it is to design/plan/facilitate in these spaces?
As in this Summer I¡¯ll study and test with some of these platforms, I would like to hear some thoughts and piggyback on your learnings and experiences.?
My best wishes,
Fernando Murray Loureiro
CAN (250) 509.1167
?
"You miss 100% of the shots you never take." ??Wayne Gretzky, hockey legend