¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Active tone control

Frank Taylor
 

Hello friends,
Can anyone help me with a circuit for a one or two transistor active
tone control for npn transistors used at 15 or 25 volts.
This is to go immediately after a preamp and feed the main amp.

I am quite capable of making the circuit up but at 76 years of age,
my design skills lay with valves/tubes.

Any help greatfully received.

Steve


Virus Warning

 

I've detected virus on "rs-232" thread so be careful
Imran


Re: A question

Himanshu Sharma
 

hey ,

there is a slot to measure the response of a diode in the oscilloscope..what
it does is to compare the output of diode with the input...
It shows the result in the X-Y mode of the oscilloscope..

hth,

Regards :-),

--himanshu sharma

: Can you tell me a simple way to measure the responsivity of a
: diode. I want to plot a curve in an oscilloscope for two diodes.
:
: thanks,
: JR
:
:


Re: rs 232 pin configuration

Himanshu Sharma
 

hey ,

Please find enclosed the file that has the pin info...

And please do let us know what do you want to do with the parallel port..Its
always good to know what all others do make with the same basics....:-)

Regards :-),

--himanshu sharma

----- Original Message -----
From: iman hermansyah <iman_hermansyah@...>
To: <Electronics_101@...>
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 12:31 PM
Subject: [Electronics_101] rs 232 pin configuration


: Guys,
:
: Would U please tell me how is the pin assignment for
: RS-232 com Port ? which one is RX and TX on PC-comm fort?
:
: __________________________________________________
: Do You Yahoo!?
: Find a job, post your resume.
:
:


begin 666 9PIN.zip
M4$L#!!0````(`.&K?"J3)O3.-0(``(8'```(````.5!)3BY(5$V=E5]OFS 4
MQ=&#92;K]3O<YFE[`!,2TF0#) (LC91_(LZF/CK@!"1B,C!-MT&#92;_&])4:]1I]0NV
M,>?&#92;[KD@8]&#92;%2Q&#92;_KD)XP/,9K#;CV=2'CH;0CYZ/4("#=J.O&X!+PJJ,9P4C
M.4+AHN/>WMAWF@85>:()[,KB`'69.Y&#92;,HS_XG')^_(+0Z732*=OKI-[6)=-I
M4J.ZHF6%DJ+>H]$Q8WK*#SEHFG23+-=^"+U KN8A]D#Z:/1GG3TY?L$X95S#
MOXX4XG;A=#A]YDAZ?(4X)65%N7/*6%*<*JUK6F;GXG11S-=-)DNW#+UOF:;>
M'1I&!Q@Y4&<2+L+(P&#92;O(M=%+'>-E&#92;.B.8)4QX 685C/S$G+D(@B(!U:N_6VY
MP+ C,76&#92;,B,Y5-EOZI@N3BGLBCPO1$E[X&2;4ZA241OPM,G :"P[6D$F>IM0
M(,*OXH0EI$Q@!,<+4&#92;Y(R]1M)'$NV.A]LB@KF'X'DF=[YL0B-RWE/>R-9R'$
M-,_71Q*+HIQ!LUJ1))$K$[9%F=#2,<33`#9NPK?3J!GE+'@7:Z]QM%Q,7'OC
MCC39)[_-6)0VVHB>GK?A[-0&L1$./N9]?@G_-/_;7ERB#^20[ET(_."UU_]5
MH]0-KW0*<!,B%7;OK4P!W0.L@C;?RA30?0API,(VKH0*= LF"Y7D]U<Z!?@`
M@K5*]&N=`OP>(KQ6@/>O= KP(?A*<.M*IP`?0315^>#,5]V+7!ROER+$I3DY
MQ2A/7#&*T]B]",Y[S?_N]N8/4$L!`A0`% ````@`X:M&#92;*I,F],XU`@``A@<`
M``@``````````0`@`+:!`````#E024XN2%1-4$L%!@`````!``$`-@```%L"
$````````
`
end


Quick mesage from the moderator... Was (Re: PIC resources)

 

--- In Electronics_101@y..., Peter tremewen <Ptremewe@b...> wrote:


I'm also very happy at the amount of
traffic on the group, though keeping up with it all with my other
Email load has
been fun, and apologies to those who don't like 30 to 50 plus email
a day.


If a member is experiencing e-mail overload, they can simply change
there settings to "No Email," and read from the web as I do. The
title often tells you if you want to delete or read. And the Yahoo
interface allows you to expand the messages so you have something
like a digest. I am sure most of you know this already, but if there
are those of you who don't, now you do, if you got this far.

Very best regards,Don

Home of the "Living in the Philippines," list,
Where Expats give advice to would be Expats and Travelers
about Living traveling doing business and playing, in the Land of
Smiles.


Boardmaker 3.00

 

hi friends;

I need a pcb drawing programme which operates under
the windows... =)) It could be Boardmaker 3.00 , I
used 2.00 before in dos. If u know, where ? can find
the crack of it...it will be very usefull.....

thanks to eveybody......

love from.... erdem.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.


rs 232 pin configuration

iman hermansyah
 

Guys,

Would U please tell me how is the pin assignment for
RS-232 com Port ? which one is RX and TX on PC-comm fort?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.


Re: Parallel Port Interrupt

GT Bradley
 

try looking at

it has links to more information on parallel ports than almost anyone could want.
GT

adityanewalkar@... wrote:

Hi,
In EPP mode if the peripheral wants to communicate something to the
PC, is there a way to interrupt the PC??

Though there is an interrupt bit defined in the standards, Control
Port bit number 4 called Enable Interrupt Request; I am not finding
any resources on the perticular thing. Can somebody tell me sources
describing SPECIFICALLY ABOUT PARLLEL PORT INTERRUPT??

Please don't give me some sites giving BASIC information. I want
specifically PARALLEL PORT INTERRUPT.
Thanx in advance.

Aditya N.


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <> .
.


Re: PIC resources

aconto
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

?

Sure seems to be a lot of group moderators on this list¡­. or at least want-a-bees. You know I know we all have opinions and questions. So if a person doesn¡¯t like the topics here they don¡¯t have to be here¡­ but I also see how my inbox has gotton full of crap too. I am here for information not drama¡­I can get that from Springer or any other TV program for that matter

-----Original Message-----
From: Mounir Shita [mailto:mshita@...]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:07 PM
To: 'Electronics_101@...'
Subject: RE: [Electronics_101] Re: PIC resources

?

Of course, we could go further on and say that any questions regarding a diode should be directed to the a diode list, either on Yahoo! Groups or Usenet or something. And transistors to a transistor list, and so on. Which at the end leaves this group with nothing.

?

Bottom line is I think that ANY general electronic question can be asked here. Anything from resistors to shoot making a PCB board. Everything is 101 stuff. Now, if you want to know how to make a super efficient multitasking PIC OS, then yeah, pic list would give you a good answer. But I bet that most guys from pic list are in this group too. And wouldn't such advance question be intriguing for beginners? I know I sure got pretty tired of just learning about the real basic stuff when I started. It was fun seeing and touching into the advance things too. That way I could easily apply the beginners stuff with advance stuff!

?

Mounir

-----Original Message-----
From: manifold [mailto:manifold_1@...]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Electronics_101@...
Subject: [Electronics_101] Re: PIC resources

Yes this is all well and good but if someone wants questions answered
about the PIC microcontrollers they will get better answers from a
PIC discussion group.? I have been in several PIC discussion groups
over the years and found them very helpful.

Asking PIC questions on this list is a little like asking VHDL
questions on this list.? It's related to electronics but I will
probably get better answers on a discussion list devoted to the topic
since there is one.

I don't think there is a capacitors discussion list and capacitors
are part of beginning electronics (electronics 101).? Capacitors are
also discussed in physics so capacitors could be discussed on either
list.? If there were a capacitors discussion list then better answers
to capacitor questions would be found there.

It is less about what should be discussed on this list and more about
where the best answers can be found.


--- In Electronics_101@y..., Mounir Shita
> To a certain degree, I think electronics can be discussed in a
physics
> group. However, the tie between microcontrollers and discrete
components are
> much stronger than physics and electronics.
>?
> Another point, a microcontroller is designed specifically to
interface with
> general electronics. I would say the discussion of Pentium
processor are
> much far off the topic cause these are not considered or meant to
be used in
> embedded systems. A microcontrollers firmware can not be altered so
much
> that you can run Windows on it, unless you of course alter the whole
> circuit.
>?
> So simply, yes, I still think microcontroller discussion belong to
this
> group. Of course, if its more into specific software coding
techniques of
> PICs (or whatever) then a pic list would be better. But general
programming
> questions, microcontroller interface etc, belongs to this group as
much as
> capacitors and charge :)
>?
> Mounir
>




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .



Re: PIC resources

 

Yes I am in full agreement. The misunderstanding is not in the
freedom of being able to ask questions it is in the answers
received. I can ask questions about my cat on the dog list and I
will get answers but I might get better answers on the cat list.

I appoligize if I was misunderstood as promoting censorship.


--- In Electronics_101@y..., Mounir Shita <mshita@c...> wrote:
Of course, we could go further on and say that any questions
regarding a
diode should be directed to the a diode list, either on Yahoo!
Groups or
Usenet or something. And transistors to a transistor list, and so
on. Which
at the end leaves this group with nothing.

Bottom line is I think that ANY general electronic question can be
asked
here. Anything from resistors to shoot making a PCB board.
Everything is 101
stuff. Now, if you want to know how to make a super efficient
multitasking
PIC OS, then yeah, pic list would give you a good answer. But I bet
that
most guys from pic list are in this group too. And wouldn't such
advance
question be intriguing for beginners? I know I sure got pretty
tired of just
learning about the real basic stuff when I started. It was fun
seeing and
touching into the advance things too. That way I could easily apply
the
beginners stuff with advance stuff!

Mounir

-----Original Message-----
From: manifold [mailto:manifold_1@y...]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Electronics_101@y...
Subject: [Electronics_101] Re: PIC resources


Yes this is all well and good but if someone wants questions
answered
about the PIC microcontrollers they will get better answers from a
PIC discussion group. I have been in several PIC discussion groups
over the years and found them very helpful.

Asking PIC questions on this list is a little like asking VHDL
questions on this list. It's related to electronics but I will
probably get better answers on a discussion list devoted to the
topic
since there is one.

I don't think there is a capacitors discussion list and capacitors
are part of beginning electronics (electronics 101). Capacitors
are
also discussed in physics so capacitors could be discussed on
either
list. If there were a capacitors discussion list then better
answers
to capacitor questions would be found there.

It is less about what should be discussed on this list and more
about
where the best answers can be found.


--- In Electronics_101@y..., Mounir Shita <mshita@c...> wrote:
To a certain degree, I think electronics can be discussed in a
physics
group. However, the tie between microcontrollers and discrete
components are
much stronger than physics and electronics.

Another point, a microcontroller is designed specifically to
interface with
general electronics. I would say the discussion of Pentium
processor are
much far off the topic cause these are not considered or meant to
be used in
embedded systems. A microcontrollers firmware can not be altered
so
much
that you can run Windows on it, unless you of course alter the
whole
circuit.

So simply, yes, I still think microcontroller discussion belong
to
this
group. Of course, if its more into specific software coding
techniques of
PICs (or whatever) then a pic list would be better. But general
programming
questions, microcontroller interface etc, belongs to this group
as
much as
capacitors and charge :)

Mounir



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

<
060580
37:HM/A=766844/R=0/*>

<
M=178320.1681224.3212089.1261774/D=egroupmai
l/S=1706058037:HM/A=766844/rand=587613582>

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@y...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<> .


Re: Why are Coaxial cables 75 or 50 Ohm?

Jim Purcell
 

Steve,
uhhh.... yeah... well, the uhh, "subject" header does sorta state the question pretty plainly.
I have a bad habit of not reading subject headers since threads often go far
afield from the original topic. I recall that on my favorite BBS they could go on for
weeks. :-)

Jim


Re: choke

Jim Purcell
 

Himanshu,

a quick response...it works as an inductor...which reduces the current but
doesn't consume the power...it also helps in increasing the current
slowly...
The way I compared coils, chocks and otherwise, with capacitors was...

Inductance passes DC, and opposes AC (but that is frequency dependent)
A capacitor does the opposite, it blocks DC and pass AC (again frequency
dependent)

I can think of two common uses of a choke coil, in power supplies (in the
old days mostly, and RF circuits. In RF each stage of an RF amplifier
got it's power connection through an RF choke, which along with a
capacitor, kept the common power supply connections from coupling
RF between amplifier stages and prevented the oscillation that would
result otherwise.

In power supplies choke coils worked with filter capacitors to 'smooth'
the pulsating DC that comes from diode rectification of AC. In this
instance I would say that coils oppose change in current and capacitors
oppose changes in voltage.

Jim


Re: A question

 

Do you mean a curve tracer?
Here is a build your own circuit using a transformer. Add a variac
to the transformer so you can adjust the voltage. Change the
resistance to change the diode current.


Look at figure 6.1

This information was found performing a search using the key words:
curve tracer diode build
using the google serach engine.

--- In Electronics_101@y..., "Ramachandran Jothikumar"
<jrchandran79@y...> wrote:
hai guys,
Can you tell me a simple way to measure the responsivity of a
diode. I want to plot a curve in an oscilloscope for two diodes.

thanks,
JR


Re: PIC resources

Mounir Shita
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Of course, we could go further on and say that any questions regarding a diode should be directed to the a diode list, either on Yahoo! Groups or Usenet or something. And transistors to a transistor list, and so on. Which at the end leaves this group with nothing.
?
Bottom line is I think that ANY general electronic question can be asked here. Anything from resistors to shoot making a PCB board. Everything is 101 stuff. Now, if you want to know how to make a super efficient multitasking PIC OS, then yeah, pic list would give you a good answer. But I bet that most guys from pic list are in this group too. And wouldn't such advance question be intriguing for beginners? I know I sure got pretty tired of just learning about the real basic stuff when I started. It was fun seeing and touching into the advance things too. That way I could easily apply the beginners stuff with advance stuff!
?
Mounir

-----Original Message-----
From: manifold [mailto:manifold_1@...]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Electronics_101@...
Subject: [Electronics_101] Re: PIC resources

Yes this is all well and good but if someone wants questions answered
about the PIC microcontrollers they will get better answers from a
PIC discussion group.? I have been in several PIC discussion groups
over the years and found them very helpful.

Asking PIC questions on this list is a little like asking VHDL
questions on this list.? It's related to electronics but I will
probably get better answers on a discussion list devoted to the topic
since there is one.

I don't think there is a capacitors discussion list and capacitors
are part of beginning electronics (electronics 101).? Capacitors are
also discussed in physics so capacitors could be discussed on either
list.? If there were a capacitors discussion list then better answers
to capacitor questions would be found there.

It is less about what should be discussed on this list and more about
where the best answers can be found.


--- In Electronics_101@y..., Mounir Shita wrote:
> To a certain degree, I think electronics can be discussed in a
physics
> group. However, the tie between microcontrollers and discrete
components are
> much stronger than physics and electronics.
>?
> Another point, a microcontroller is designed specifically to
interface with
> general electronics. I would say the discussion of Pentium
processor are
> much far off the topic cause these are not considered or meant to
be used in
> embedded systems. A microcontrollers firmware can not be altered so
much
> that you can run Windows on it, unless you of course alter the whole
> circuit.
>?
> So simply, yes, I still think microcontroller discussion belong to
this
> group. Of course, if its more into specific software coding
techniques of
> PICs (or whatever) then a pic list would be better. But general
programming
> questions, microcontroller interface etc, belongs to this group as
much as
> capacitors and charge :)
>?
> Mounir
>




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Re: choke

Himanshu Sharma
 

hey ,

a quick response...it works as an inductor...which reduces the current but
doesn't consume the power...it also helps in increasing the current
slowly...

it is made up of coils...(mostly of cu or al..)

Regards :-),

--himanshu sharma

----- Original Message -----
From: Ste ve <astrodood@...>
To: <Electronics_101@...>
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 2:15 AM
Subject: [Electronics_101] choke


: Hello,
:
: I'm a new addition to this group. 1215 members? wow! I had to see what
: all the commotion was about.
:
: A question to get rolling: How does a choke work? How are they made?
:
: thanks.
:
: Steve.
:
: _________________________________________________________________
: Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
:
:


Re: PIC resources

 

Yes this is all well and good but if someone wants questions answered
about the PIC microcontrollers they will get better answers from a
PIC discussion group. I have been in several PIC discussion groups
over the years and found them very helpful.

Asking PIC questions on this list is a little like asking VHDL
questions on this list. It's related to electronics but I will
probably get better answers on a discussion list devoted to the topic
since there is one.

I don't think there is a capacitors discussion list and capacitors
are part of beginning electronics (electronics 101). Capacitors are
also discussed in physics so capacitors could be discussed on either
list. If there were a capacitors discussion list then better answers
to capacitor questions would be found there.

It is less about what should be discussed on this list and more about
where the best answers can be found.


--- In Electronics_101@y..., Mounir Shita <mshita@c...> wrote:
To a certain degree, I think electronics can be discussed in a
physics
group. However, the tie between microcontrollers and discrete
components are
much stronger than physics and electronics.

Another point, a microcontroller is designed specifically to
interface with
general electronics. I would say the discussion of Pentium
processor are
much far off the topic cause these are not considered or meant to
be used in
embedded systems. A microcontrollers firmware can not be altered so
much
that you can run Windows on it, unless you of course alter the whole
circuit.

So simply, yes, I still think microcontroller discussion belong to
this
group. Of course, if its more into specific software coding
techniques of
PICs (or whatever) then a pic list would be better. But general
programming
questions, microcontroller interface etc, belongs to this group as
much as
capacitors and charge :)

Mounir


Re: A question

Mounir Shita
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

You mean voltage vs time?
?
If so, can't you just use a voltage stepper to increase the voltage on both diode by f.example 0.05V. Use a channel for each diode.
?
I have a feeling I totally misunderstood the question :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Ramachandran Jothikumar [mailto:jrchandran79@...]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:44 PM
To: Electronics_101@...
Subject: [Electronics_101] A question

hai guys,
????? Can you tell me a simple way to measure the responsivity of a
diode. I want to plot a curve in an oscilloscope for two diodes.

thanks,
JR



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


A question

Ramachandran Jothikumar
 

hai guys,
Can you tell me a simple way to measure the responsivity of a
diode. I want to plot a curve in an oscilloscope for two diodes.

thanks,
JR


Re: Parallel Port Interfacing

 

Do you mean slow compared to a parallel port or to an ASIC?

--- In Electronics_101@y..., "Himanshu Sharma" <hs_ramdev@y...> wrote:
hey ,

won't the fpga controller slow...because it can't give the real-time
performance as the controller which you plan to make on it...(Just a
guess..never did a real FPGA programming...just simulated
netlists.....)

Regards :-),

--himanshu sharma
----- Original Message -----
From: <adityanewalkar@y...>
To: <Electronics_101@y...>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:33 PM
Subject: [Electronics_101] Parallel Port Interfacing


: Hi,
: I am building a demo board which will be interfaced with the PC by
: means of Parallel Port in EPP mode. My guess is that I will
require a
: IEEE 1284 compatible controller on the board to communicate with
the
: PC.
:
: Now the board has a FPGA on it. My question is whether
:
: 1) it will be easier to program the FPGA to act like a
controller? or
: 2) Buy an off-the-shelf IEEE 1284 compatible controller and
program
: the FPGA to operate in conjuction with this controller??
:
:
: I have made an independent search of parallel port controllers and
: found that CD1283 is the only controller which has a lot of
material
: available about. However CD1283 has a bit complicated
architecture.
: Is there any other/simpler/probably cheaper controller available??
:
:
: thanx
: aditya
:
:


Re: PIC resources

Mounir Shita
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

To a certain degree, I think electronics can be discussed in a physics group. However, the tie between microcontrollers and discrete components are much stronger than physics and electronics.
?
Another point, a microcontroller is designed specifically to interface with general electronics. I would say the discussion of Pentium processor are much far off the topic cause these are not considered or meant to be used in embedded systems. A microcontrollers firmware can not be altered so much that you can run Windows on it, unless you of course alter the whole circuit.
?
So simply, yes, I still think microcontroller discussion belong to this group. Of course, if its more into specific software coding techniques of PICs (or whatever) then a pic list would be better. But general programming questions, microcontroller interface etc, belongs to this group as much as capacitors and charge :)
?
Mounir

-----Original Message-----
From: d nixon [mailto:dnixon9@...]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:17 PM
To: Electronics_101@...
Subject: RE: [Electronics_101] Re: PIC resources

Yes, microcontrollers are electronic devices, but the discussion of them has
generated so much traffic that they have their own group.

Should we discuss electronics on the Physics group?

-Mike



>From: Mounir Shita
>Reply-To: Electronics_101@...
>To: "'Electronics_101@...'"
>Subject: RE: [Electronics_101] Re: PIC resources
>Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:26:16 -0500
>
>I would disagree with everyone who thinks PIC discussions doesn't belong to
>this group either. I think we're beyond the times where you could do
>everything with discrete components. These days microcontrollers belong as
>much to Basic Electronics as a transistor and a diode.
>
>Mounir
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: d nixon [mailto:dnixon9@...]
>Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:23 PM
>To: Electronics_101@...
>Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Re: PIC resources
>
>
>You'd get a better answer on the PIC group.
>
>
>
> >From: "Teodoro M. Villamarzo"
> >Reply-To: Electronics_101@...
> >To: Electronics_101@...
> >Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Re: PIC resources
> >Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 12:28:19 +0800
> >
> >Sorry for this newbie question, but I'm really interested:
> >
> >Can some tell me what a PIC is, and what it does, and what the
>differences
> >between the PIC17 and 18?
> >
> >Thanks...
> >
> >Ted
> >
> >
> >At 08:48 PM 10/30/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >>>Must agree, 18 is way better than 17. Hopefully soon they'll get all
> >>>their parts out in flash versions. Have you thought about using the
> >>>dsPIC, when it comes out, to something ? I'm very excited about that
> >>>part. Price wise, its very close to the PIC18-family. However, its 16
> >>>bit and much faster.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>From what I have read about the dsPIC it sounds impressive. However at
> >>present time I think I will have little use for it at work.? But I might
> >>play around with it at home some when it come out, just for fun.
> >>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >>ADVERTISEMENT
> >>
> >>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >>Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> >>< <>
> >Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
><>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>ADVERTISEMENT
>
><
>37:HM/A=806910/R=0/*
>.asp?sc=14856015> Click Here!
>
><
>l/S=1706058037:HM/A=806910/rand=842370662>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
><> .
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .