开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Charge Storage in Cap (capacitance 101)

Jim Purcell
 

manifold,

Here is a question to ponder about capacitance. Disregarding
leakage, why do capacitors of the same physical dimensions, i.e.,
plate spacing and area, with different dielectrics have very
different capacities?
Because the dielectric constant is different. If they are chemically
different they may have produce different capacitance for the same
dimensions. Ceramic caps for example are nothing but little discs
flashed with metal, hardly any plate surface area compared to tubular,
etc.

Here's a hint, _very_ pure water is a good dielectric. It is just
not very practicle for use in consumer devices.
So which side are you on as the real storer of the charge, dielectric or
plates?

Jim


Re: Charge Storage in Cap (capacitance 101)

 

Here is a question to ponder about capacitance. Disregarding
leakage, why do capacitors of the same physical dimensions, i.e.,
plate spacing and area, with different dielectrics have very
different capacities?

Here's a hint, _very_ pure water is a good dielectric. It is just
not very practicle for use in consumer devices.

It should be in that old EE text book somewhere! It could even be in
the physics book. I can look it up for more details if anyone is
really interested.

I think the answer to the static on the comb question is in the
details of surface chemistry and triboelectric effects or "rubbing
the electrons off the suface". If there is no conducting path to
take them back to the other surface then the charge is "stuck" on the
insulating comb with no way to move around. Except for maybe the
unsuspecting cat/co-worker/sister/mother in law :)


Conductors have atoms with an incomplete valance ring - the
outter
electron ring of the atom doesn't have as many electrons in the
ring as
the ring capable of having - it isn't full. Since the ring isn't
full,
an electron could move into the ring and then back out. This is
what
current flow is.

Insulators have complete valance rings - there outer ring has
as
many electrons as will fit. It takes more force to get electrons
to
move from atom to atom. The force required is the dielectric
breakdown
voltage. Sometimes whin breakdown occures the resulting current
causes
permanent damage to the dielectric. And sometimes, when the current
flow
is stopped, the dielectric will return to its prevous state -
yielding
the "self healing dielectrics" that someone else mentioned.

A capacitor is formed when two plates are seperated by a
dielectric.
If a voltage potential is applied between the plates, current will
flow
untill the charge between the plates matches the potential of the
applied source. The current DID NOT into or through flow through
the
dielectric. The electrons were simply moved from one plate to the
other
through the source of the applied voltage.
If the voltage source is now removed, the charges will remain on
the
plates untill a current path( a conductor) is placed between them.
Dielectrics have "leakage" because they are not a perfect insulator
so
the voltage potential will slowly drop as the dielectric allows a
small
current to flow from one plate to the other.

PERFECT capacitors would have dielectrics that have an infinate
breakdown voltage and zero leakage and conductors that have no
resistance to limit current flow.

Charges are stored on plates because dielectrics don't conduct.

OK, now what about collecting static charges on a comb as you run
it
through your hair? The electrons flow from your hair to the surface
of
the comb. If the comb were a perfect insulator, there would be no
current flow to the surface of the comb.


Doug Hale


Some very interesting links for you

James
 

Hello,
My name is James Roberts and I am primarily associated with the
mind-l yahoo group. I have some interesting links for you.

The first concerns a public safety study of a mind-altering device
comprised of a helmet fitted with electromagnets. It can produce
interesting experiences and positive emotional change. The key is the
special signals that are recorded on cd.



The second concerns an arrangement of high-voltage equipment that
produces levitation in magnetic and non-magnetic objects, spontaneous
fires, floating lights, etc.



Sic Luceat Lux,
Xenoticus


No metal in MOS?

Doug Hale
 

The context of no metal had to do with fabrication of the transistor, not interconnecting them.

MOS means metal oxide semiconductor.. the metal oxide forms the transistor gate. A poly gate transistor
has the metal oxide replaced with poly-silicon. We still cal it a MOS transistor - either due to tradition - or because PSS is harder to say(ha ha). (and CPSS instead of CMOS would even be worse)


Doug Hale


Kevin Vannorsdel wrote:

For RAM processes? This is interesting... are you saying you use NO metal interconnects in RAM? Even for power distribution??

Very curious. KV.

________________________________________________
Kevin Vannorsdel IBM Arm Electronics Development
408-256-6492 Tie 276-6492 kv@... KF6YCI

Please respond to Electronics_101@... To: <Electronics_101@...>
cc: Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Re: Fuses--for kevin;-)




hey ,
just to add...now we use polysilicon instead of the metal...:-)
Regards :-),
--himanshu sharma
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Vannorsdel To: Electronics_101@... Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Re: Fuses vs. resistors

I'm new to this group so missed the CMOS topic (which I would have enjoyed)... CMOS transistors use metal as interconnects - mainly aluminum. The latest silicon processes are beginning to use Copper as interconnects. This is fairly widely publicized so you may all know this.

The CMOS transistor itself is made of standard P and N type silicon (with various doping levels) along with Poly-Silicon for the gate and a bunch of silicon dioxide for the gate dielectric.

Metal is still a very important issue in IC design. See my previous comments on electromigration...

KV.

________________________________________________
Kevin Vannorsdel IBM Arm Electronics Development
408-256-6492 Tie 276-6492 kv@... KF6YCI

Please respond to Electronics_101@... To: Electronics_101@...
cc: Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Re: Fuses vs. resistors



heros,

or that the length of a wire has nothing to do with resistence
- mark

But I do find it surprising that one who likes to get things stated
correctly does not want a wire to be called a resistor!!
Since these quotes are all mixed up and shortened I don't know who said what
and for certain what he said. Here's my parting shot on the fuze, resistor,
etc. topic.
I was wrong when I originally said that a fuze has no resistance, and of
course the resistance is required for it to fuze, i.e. blow, when it's rated
current passes through it. That something has resistance doesn't make it a
resistor. If it did we'd have to call everything that is not an insulator
a
resistors, transformers, wires, fuzes, etc. A resistor is not simply a device
that has resistance but one in which resistance is utilized as part of the
circuit design, to achieve a voltage drop when connected in series, to bypass
current in a device when in parallel, i.e. shunt like the old D'Arsonval
(SP?) analog meters when used to measure current. Someone earlier said that
CMOS devices actually no longer use Metal, I don't know whether that is so,
but we don't stop calling them CMOS, which may be why I didn't know that
metal is no longer used in their manufacture.

Anyway, that's my swan song on the issue.

Jim



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to






To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to



Re: Light Activated Alarm

Kenyon Jones
 

开云体育

Jim,
?
I am very greatful and appreciate you taking the time to formulate this response. Not being an electronics expert, your detail has helped me to understand what needs to be done. Incidently, I am an investigator in the transportation industry and this alarm will be placed inside of packages. If someone attempts to pilfer the "test" package, the alarm will sound.
?
Again, much thanks to you.
?
Sincerely,
?
Kenyon Jones
?
?
?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Purcell [mailto:jpurcell@...]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:12 AM
To: Electronics_101@...
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Light Activated Alarm

Kenyon,
Thank you for your response. It seems that the photo transistor is conducting enough to send minimal current through the relay but not enough to activate the switch, so to speak.

In this case you will probably require a second transistor, connect the phot transistor with the collector at Vcc and the emitter on the base of the second transistor. This way the first tranny provides bias to the second. Put the relay in series with the second transistors collector and Vcc.
The emitter can go to ground, i.e. p.s. comnon. These would both be NPN transistors else you can turn the power supply upside down, i.e. pos. grounded etc.

My problem is that I need the circuit to be such that the alarm continues, even if light is removed from the photo transistor.

This will require a latching device. If you are using a ralay instead of a solid state device you can use an auxilliary set of contacts to hold the relay in after the lighe 'goes away'. Or you could possibly use an SCR (silocon control rectifier) in place of the second transistor, these devices stay on once triggered.

Could you tell me more about "putting the alarm device in series with the collector and VCC.

This is pretty strait foreward.? Connect one end of the relay to Vcc (p.s. +)
and the other end of the relay to the transistor collector. The emitter goes to ground, or p.s. common.? The base of a photo transistor goes to light, i.e. the light turns on the transistor.? Or if this is the second transistor it would be connected to the emitter of the first one.? What I have described here is a very simplified description. More specifics would depend on the nature of the devices used, etc.

Jim
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Charge Storage in Cap

Doug Hale
 

Capacitors are made of two types of material, conductors (plates) and insulators (dielectrics).

The question of whether the charge is stored in the dielectric or the plates can be understood by knowing a little of the material science of conductors and insulators.

Conductors have atoms with an incomplete valance ring - the outter electron ring of the atom doesn't have as many electrons in the ring as the ring capable of having - it isn't full. Since the ring isn't full, an electron could move into the ring and then back out. This is what current flow is.

Insulators have complete valance rings - there outer ring has as many electrons as will fit. It takes more force to get electrons to move from atom to atom. The force required is the dielectric breakdown voltage. Sometimes whin breakdown occures the resulting current causes permanent damage to the dielectric. And sometimes, when the current flow is stopped, the dielectric will return to its prevous state - yielding the "self healing dielectrics" that someone else mentioned.

A capacitor is formed when two plates are seperated by a dielectric. If a voltage potential is applied between the plates, current will flow untill the charge between the plates matches the potential of the applied source. The current DID NOT into or through flow through the dielectric. The electrons were simply moved from one plate to the other through the source of the applied voltage.
If the voltage source is now removed, the charges will remain on the plates untill a current path( a conductor) is placed between them. Dielectrics have "leakage" because they are not a perfect insulator so the voltage potential will slowly drop as the dielectric allows a small current to flow from one plate to the other.
PERFECT capacitors would have dielectrics that have an infinate breakdown voltage and zero leakage and conductors that have no resistance to limit current flow.

Charges are stored on plates because dielectrics don't conduct.

OK, now what about collecting static charges on a comb as you run it through your hair? The electrons flow from your hair to the surface of the comb. If the comb were a perfect insulator, there would be no current flow to the surface of the comb.


Doug Hale


Re: Fuses--for kevin;-)

Kevin Vannorsdel
 

For RAM processes? This is interesting... are you saying you use NO metal
interconnects in RAM? Even for power distribution??

Very curious. KV.

________________________________________________
Kevin Vannorsdel IBM Arm Electronics Development
408-256-6492 Tie 276-6492 kv@... KF6YCI

Please respond to Electronics_101@...
To: <Electronics_101@...>
cc:
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Re: Fuses--for kevin;-)




hey ,

just to add...now we use polysilicon instead of the metal...:-)

Regards :-),

--himanshu sharma

----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Vannorsdel
To: Electronics_101@...
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Re: Fuses vs. resistors

I'm new to this group so missed the CMOS topic (which I would have
enjoyed)... CMOS transistors use metal as interconnects - mainly
aluminum. The latest silicon processes are beginning to use Copper as
interconnects. This is fairly widely publicized so you may all know
this.

The CMOS transistor itself is made of standard P and N type silicon
(with
various doping levels) along with Poly-Silicon for the gate and a bunch
of
silicon dioxide for the gate dielectric.

Metal is still a very important issue in IC design. See my previous
comments on electromigration...

KV.

________________________________________________
Kevin Vannorsdel IBM Arm Electronics Development
408-256-6492 Tie 276-6492 kv@... KF6YCI

Please respond to Electronics_101@...
To: Electronics_101@...
cc:
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Re: Fuses vs. resistors



heros,

or that the length of a wire has nothing to do with resistence
- mark

But I do find it surprising that one who likes to get things stated
correctly does not want a wire to be called a resistor!!
Since these quotes are all mixed up and shortened I don't know who said
what
and for certain what he said. Here's my parting shot on the fuze,
resistor,
etc. topic.
I was wrong when I originally said that a fuze has no resistance, and of
course the resistance is required for it to fuze, i.e. blow, when it's
rated
current passes through it. That something has resistance doesn't make it

a
resistor. If it did we'd have to call everything that is not an insulator

a
resistors, transformers, wires, fuzes, etc. A resistor is not simply a
device
that has resistance but one in which resistance is utilized as part of
the
circuit design, to achieve a voltage drop when connected in series, to
bypass
current in a device when in parallel, i.e. shunt like the old D'Arsonval
(SP?) analog meters when used to measure current. Someone earlier said
that
CMOS devices actually no longer use Metal, I don't know whether that is
so,
but we don't stop calling them CMOS, which may be why I didn't know that
metal is no longer used in their manufacture.

Anyway, that's my swan song on the issue.

Jim



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to






To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Re: all my freinds

Lise Quinn
 

开云体育

I think you glorify it too much. A hacker's goal is most often to get around a security or licensing issue. You can romanticize a thief all you want but they will still serve real time for their crimes. And they don't look so cool?behind bars. Our own government is considering equating web-defacing and Denial of service attacks to acts of terrorism.
?
Just because one did no harm after compromising a system doesn't mean that it is not wrong or 'bad' to do so, I think the argument that such people give opportunities to create better security is very weak, and if it were to float at all then it would be true in all cases. Just because you don't have a steel door and an enhanced security system for your house doesn't mean that it's alright for anyone to come into your front door and have a party in your house. To use the security argument, they were just showing you that you should have better locks on your doors.
?
Lise
?
?

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] all my freinds

Himanshu,
what i say is that hackers are not bad and niether they are evil..

No one is bad/evil, but some peole do bad things, including hackers.
A hacker is not someone who does bad things, nor is hacking bad,
but some hackers break into or snoop computers and I consider
that a bad thing. How bad depends on the act.

My main point has been to differentiate from the bad things that
some hackers do and hackers in general. It's probably the term,
it just sounds bad, as in using a machetti and hacking through
the jungle, only the implication is that they hack into compters.
But the real meaning has to do with persistance, a hacker just
keeps on with his hobby, never tiring.

Jim



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Recomendations on books

Doug Hale
 

I just ate lunch next to a Radio Shack and decided to stop in and look at their begining electronics books. After spending a few minutes thumbing through them, I would recomend them. There are three that I looked at;
Begining Electronics
Begining Digital Electronics
Begining Comunications Electronics

These should be availible at retail outlets as well as the online Radio Shack Web site.


Doug


Re: all my freinds

Himanshu Sharma
 

开云体育

Sir , Accepted With due regards..,
?
Regards :-),
?
--himanshu sharma

No one is bad/evil, but some peole do bad things, including hackers.
A hacker is not someone who does bad things, nor is hacking bad,
but some hackers break into or snoop computers and I consider
that a bad thing. How bad depends on the act.

My main point has been to differentiate from the bad things that
some hackers do and hackers in general. It's probably the term,
it just sounds bad, as in using a machetti and hacking through
the jungle, only the implication is that they hack into compters.
But the real meaning has to do with persistance, a hacker just
keeps on with his hobby, never tiring.

Jim



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Re: Digest Number 134

Jim Purcell
 

"Mr.",

My understanding of the capacitor is that the actual electron
are stored on the plate, or conductor.
Is that a derived understanding or does it come from a direct
statement made by someone who knows.?

The closer you can get them
together (meaning a thinner and less conductive dielectric),
The dielectric doesn't conduct, that's why it's also called
an insulator. The reason for greater capacitance when the
dielectric is thinner is that there is less distance through
which the charge has to act. A conductor just cannot be
charged. It's electrons are free and will not be permanently
removed or added to it's atoms. Because insulators not not
easily give up or accept electrons, once they do they stay
that way. At least until a path is provided for things to
neutralize or even to become charged with the opposite
polarity.

force they exert on each other. Both parts are involved, but the
charge is on the plates.
Nope. The part the plates play is their size, large plates involve more
dielectric surface area to the potential difference that charged it.
As does larger plate area.

Jim


Re: all my freinds

Jim Purcell
 

Himanshu,

what i say is that hackers are not bad and niether they are evil..

No one is bad/evil, but some peole do bad things, including hackers.
A hacker is not someone who does bad things, nor is hacking bad,
but some hackers break into or snoop computers and I consider
that a bad thing. How bad depends on the act.

My main point has been to differentiate from the bad things that
some hackers do and hackers in general. It's probably the term,
it just sounds bad, as in using a machetti and hacking through
the jungle, only the implication is that they hack into compters.
But the real meaning has to do with persistance, a hacker just
keeps on with his hobby, never tiring.

Jim


Re: books needed from india

Himanshu Sharma
 

开云体育

hey ,
?
You can start your electronics journey with ....
?
Arts of Electronics----Horowithz(Cambridge pub.)
?
Rest depends on your interests..!!
?
Regards :-),
?
--himanshu sharma

----- Original Message -----
From: manifold
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:13 AM
Subject: [Electronics_101] Re: books needed from india

Here is a good link for an on line elecronic text book of
electronics.? It is in the bookmarks section of this site.



--- In Electronics_101@y..., rahuljayawant@y... wrote:
> hi i am a new member of this group.i am doing electronics and
> telecommunication engg in india.i want to know are there any nice
> books available for basic electronics and basic telecommunication
by
> which i can improve my fundamentals of electronics and
> tlecommunication.



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Re: Digest Number 134

Mr.
 

--- In Electronics_101@y..., Jim Purcell <jpurcell@w...> wrote:.

Sorry, but the charge is stored in the dielectric. That's why the
amount of
capacitance depends in part on the kind of dielectric. A conductor
will not
store a charge, only provide a path for it. Insulators respond to
the potential


Jim, My understanding of the capacitor is that the actual electron
are stored on the plate, or conductor. The closer you can get them
together (meaning a thinner and less conductive dielectric), the more
force they exert on each other. Both parts are involved, but the
charge is on the plates.
Rex


Re: Light Activated Alarm

Kenyon Jones
 

开云体育

Jim,
?
Thank you for your response. It seems that the photo transistor is conducting enough to send minimal current through the relay but not enough to activate the switch, so to speak. My problem is that I need the circuit to be such that the alarm continues, even if light is removed from the photo transistor. Could you tell me more about "putting the alarm device in series with the collector and VCC. Again, I appreciate your help.
?
Sincerely,
?
Kenyon Jones
?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Purcell [mailto:jpurcell@...]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:16 PM
To: Electronics_101@...
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Light Activated Alarm

Mounir,
However, if you have the phototransistor turning on/off a relay. And you have a piezo on the other side of the realy, the this resitance shoulder matter. Cause the relay can only be on or off, nothing in between.
Yes, but it the photo transistor is not conducting enough to operate the relay or it's on the raged edge of conduction it might not work as well as it should. I would try dumping the relay and putting the alarm device in series with the collector and Vcc.

Jim

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Re: Digest Number 134

d nixon
 

Jim,

Dammit, now I HAVE to look this up. Thanks.

-Mike



From: Jim Purcell <jpurcell@...>
Reply-To: Electronics_101@...
To: Electronics_101@...
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Digest Number 134
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:29:40 -0600

d,

I'd like to know, myself, why people think that the charge is stored in
the
dielectric. It's stored on the plates, the dielectric just facilitates
electron transfer.
Sorry, but the charge is stored in the dielectric. That's why the amount of
capacitance depends in part on the kind of dielectric. A conductor will not
store a charge, only provide a path for it. Insulators respond to the potential
difference and the atoms get distorted in the sense that some lose or gain
electrons. Any imbalance in the atoms of a conductor equalizes when the current
stops, not so with insulators. The fact that I can't see how a vacuum stores a
charge doesn't alter the fact that it is the dielectric that stores the charge.

Jim

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at


Re: PIC resources

Mounir Shita
 

开云体育

Hi Michael,
?
I have some years experience with PIC.Actually 5-6 years to be exact. I've built quite a few projects. My biggest was my senior project at college 3-4 years ago when I built a speech recognition system with a PIC16 and a PIC17. Worked okay, only got 70% recognition rate. Also built tons of small projects. Right now I'm playing with a robot I'm gonna squeeze a PIC18F to do some simple navigation.
?
Mounir

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Carey [mailto:mpc@...]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 9:52 PM
To: Electronics_101@...
Subject: [Electronics_101] PIC resources

How many people have experience with PIC's, I am looking to share code snippets with other people. Also if people have unique or interesting projects using PIC's I would be interested in knowing of them. I have my own PIC resource page - it generally deals with the Dick Smith PIC programmer and testbed, here is the url:
If you have a webpage on a PIC project or resources I would be interested in throwing in a link to it especially if it is a cool project or has similar value.
Cheers Michael C
?


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Electronics_101-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .


Re: Capator tester

d nixon
 

I have seen several capacitor testers in books by Delton T. Horn (TAB books). Check your local library.

-Mike



From: "Michael Carey" <mpc@...>
Reply-To: Electronics_101@...
To: <Electronics_101@...>
Subject: [Electronics_101] Capator tester
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:59:08 +1100

Could anybody point me in the right direction to design a capacitor tester. I have studied Elec Eng, but am curious as to what value to use as a resistive load as the basis (or should I use several?) I am keen to put together something of this nature and am thinking along the lines of using a PIC to do the work. Does anybody have experience in this area, and would not mind discussing it.
Michael

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at


Re: Fw: communication concepts ??

d nixon
 

Outer space is not a total vacuum, but it's pretty dang close. As far as rockets go...

There doesn't have to be anything for the rocket to push against. Remember..."For every action there is an equal an opposite reaction." So as long as the rocket pushes *something* out the back it will move forward.

Rockets are different that propellered airplanes. Props must have something to push, rockets generate thrust through chemical reactions.

-Mike



From: "angtengchat" <angtengchat@...>
Reply-To: Electronics_101@...
To: <Electronics_101@...>
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Fw: communication concepts ??
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:10:52 +0800


----- Original Message -----
From: aseesf4@...
To: Electronics_101@...
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Electronics_101] Fw: communication concepts ??
I personally think that electro-magnetism is a force, therefore electromagnetic waves = electromagnetic force. and force can travel thru vacumn, thats how our rockets flies to the moon.
Rockets travel though space because for any force there is an equal but opposite force. Thrust from the rocket engine is focused in the opposite direction the rocket needs to go. This in turn forces the rocket forward. But the force itself is not propagated though the vacuum.
Talking about force, I wonder if a rocket could fly across a vacumn, which does not have anything at all. I just wonder how could force produce motion if there's no friction for it to force a motion.

Is outer space a vacumn?



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at


Re: books needed from india

 

Here is a good link for an on line elecronic text book of
electronics. It is in the bookmarks section of this site.



--- In Electronics_101@y..., rahuljayawant@y... wrote:
hi i am a new member of this group.i am doing electronics and
telecommunication engg in india.i want to know are there any nice
books available for basic electronics and basic telecommunication
by
which i can improve my fundamentals of electronics and
tlecommunication.