¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: DNA Day Sale - Big-Y $150 off
Fran - That's excellent news! This will be a very nice addition to that portion of the tree. I'll keep an eye out for the results, but when you see them come in, ping me and I'll take a close look. It
By Jared Smith · #103 ·
Re: DNA Day Sale - Big-Y $150 off
Hi Jared, I was notified on the Hartley Family Tree Genealogy Facebook page that John Hartley has ordered an A11132 Test from YSEQ. Joel
By Joel Hartley · #104 ·
Re: John Hartley A11132 Positive
Hi again, John Hartley just notified me of the following: "I have received my YSEQ results and the summary is A11132 T+ and Z17912 C+." Joel Hartley
By Joel Hartley · #105 ·
Re: John Hartley A11132 Positive
Joel - This is great news! Another person on our branch! If desired, you could "Wish a SNP" at YSEQ for some of the other Hartley SNPs. If they can test them, then John could take some additional
By Jared Smith · #106 ·
New Pillsbury member
I'm happy to welcome Rachel to the list. She administers the C. Pillsbury Big-Y test that is a new close match to us. She shares a relative with Fran Pillsbury dating to 1605. They both fall onto the
By Jared Smith · #107 ·
New major Smith branch!
We have a new, significant branching under Z16357. Up to this point Sylvia Smith was the only person truly at Z16357 - meaning that her kit had tested positive for Z16357, but for no shared SNPs
By Jared Smith · #108 ·
Re: New major Smith branch!
FTDNA has now had these Smith SNPs named. The new haplogroup label is R-BY19970. The FTDNA tree has been updated, as well as the terminal SNP identifier for Sylvia's and Lenita's kits. I've also
By Jared Smith · #109 ·
New aging estimates
Iain McDonald has just published a new project analyzing all of the P312 Big-Y results. P312 is much older than our Z16357. The general heredity is P312 > L21/Z290 > L513 > S5668 > Z16357. He places
By Jared Smith · #110 ·
Re: New aging estimates
Thanks for the notification, Jared. Yes, great work Iain McDonald is doing. I wonder, however, why he doesn't use the widely accepted BCE/CE dating standard rather than the old BC/AD. It's not a big
By Charles Thomas · #111 ·
Re: New aging estimates
Thanks Jared, I don¡¯t have a lot of backup, but I have thought that perhaps some of your dates were too recent. I¡¯m guessing the truth could be in the middle between you and McDonald. My thought
By Joel Hartley · #112 ·
Re: New aging estimates
I forgot to mention ¨C I checked the L513 Yahoo Forum and didn¡¯t see mention of this study. I would have thought that it would have been big news there. Joel Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:10 AM
By Joel Hartley · #113 ·
New Big-Y files needed
Hello fellow Z16357 cousins! Things have been relatively quiet around here - no new matches in quite some time. Now's a great time to recruit those STR matches of ours = Big-Y is on sale for $475. For
By Jared Smith · #114 ·
Re: New Big-Y files needed
Hi Jared, Thanks for the email and thanks for your analyses. The other file was too big. I¡¯ll try in a separate email, but the message told me to put it in a shared location. Joel Sent: Tuesday,
By Joel Hartley · #115 ·
Re: New Big-Y files needed
Yes, still no luck with the VCF. Any suggestions? I have used the Cloud through Microsoft, but only on a limited basis and am not very familiar with it. I also have my own website, but not sure how to
By Joel Hartley · #116 ·
Re: New Big-Y files needed
Joel, If by "Microsoft Cloud" you mean "One Drive", I believe if you store the file on your local OneDrive folder, you can "right-click" the file and chose "Share a OneDrive link". That will but a
By James Bennett · #117 ·
Re: New Big-Y files needed
Hi James, I guess I¡¯m underutilizing this: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AgUuC5wLrF2Ogy40BVWOsivXYYgD Hope you get it (and that it is the right file). Joel Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 11:23 AM To:
By Joel Hartley · #118 ·
Big Y build 38
Here ( http://ultimatefamilyhistorians.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-big-y-could-be-best-dna-test-ever.html )?is an interesting article on how to leverage the new FtDNA tools. ?Of course, I will need to
By James Bennett · #119 ·
Re: Big Y build 38
Thank you for the link, James! Charles ________________________________ Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 11:06 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Z16357] Big Y build 38
By Charles Thomas · #120 ·
Re: New Big-Y files needed
Hi all! I hope you had a wonderful holiday season and I wish you all the best in this new year! I'm still in need of quite a few new Build 38 files to update my analysis. I've received Raw Data files
By Jared Smith · #121 ·
Re: New Big-Y files needed
Hello Jared, Happy new year and hope you are well! It looks like the link you sent are for those who have done the Big-Y test. I haven't taken Big-Y, but I have attached an image of what is available
By Thomas Goff · #122 ·