¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: BATTY
Hi Maureen, Bentham is just south of Burton, and is a neighbouring parish just south over the fells/moors, I notice that the parents of John BATTY; Born 10 Oct 1812; Bapt 22 Nov 1812 in Bentham are
By Debbie Reddy · #2926 ·
Re: BATTY
Hi Debbie, Thanks, I have also found John BATTY; Born 10 Oct 1812; Bapt 22 Nov 1812 in Bentham, Yorkshire to William and Elizabeth. I think Bentham is near Burton ? Thats the trouble there are so many
By Maureen Farrer · #2925 ·
Re: BATTY
Hi Maureen, This could be your family. Esther JOHNSON; Born 25 Jan 1822; Cheshire; Bapt 28 Apr 1822 in Warrington Cheshire, England; Father Peter; Mother Hannah
By Jen Meadows · #2924 ·
Re: BATTY
Hi Maureen I found John in the following censuses with the following places of birth 1861 Burton in Lonsdale 1871 Lonsdale 1881 Burton The entry that Jane found "John Batty, son of William and Sarah
By Debbie Reddy · #2923 ·
Re: BATTY
Thanks Jane, I have found a John Batty b.10 Oct. 1812 to William Batty and Elizabeth in Bentham. So like I find when you are doing genealogy so many people with the same name. Thanks, Maureen
By Maureen Farrer · #2922 ·
Locked Yorkshire Surnames List - October update
I updated the Yorkshire Surnames list today. The names added are given below: CHAPPELL FAWCETT STANGAS If you would like to add your surnames to the list, please use the form at:
By Lin Duke · #2921 ·
Re: BATTY
Hi Maureen There's a Burton in Lonsdale and a Thornton in Lonsdale about two and a half miles apart. I couldn't see John in the census but found this: John Batty, son of William and Sarah baptised
By JA Woodall · #2920 ·
BATTY
Hi, Sorry my first post was wrong, so re-posting the right one, I am looking for the birth of John BATTY b. 1814.In the 1861 census it says he was born in Lonsdale in Yorkshire. His wife Esther nee
By Maureen Farrer · #2919 ·
BATTY
Hi Listers, I am looking for the birth of John BATTY b. 1814.In the 1861 census it says he was born in Lonsdale in Yorkshire. His wife Esther nee ELLIOTT b 1821 in Hatton Cheshire. I would like her
By Maureen Farrer · #2918 ·
Re: GORLEY
Yes Vicky I noticed that as well and always there are loads in USA. Maureen
By Maureen Farrer · #2917 ·
Re: GORLEY
Hi Maureen, I also noticed that Gorley is often spelled or transcribed incorrectly. I usually try all different spellings to see what I get. Good luck! Vicki Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device Get
By Vicki Campbell · #2916 ·
GORLEY
Hi Vicky, Thanks for your email regarding the GORLEY family. I have the first three children in the 1851 census with their mother Maria saying she was married but her husband Joseph GORLEY was back in
By Maureen Farrer · #2915 ·
Re 1939 register
To all those wonderful members who replied to my query , a big thank you , Kindest regards to all , Derek Whitwam -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By Derek Whitwam · #2914 ·
Re: 1939 Register
It's because you are still alive. Lancelot -- Lancelot H Barron LBarron Associates U.K
By Lancelot Barron <SirLancelot1@...> · #2913 ·
Re: 1939 Register
This normal for those still living (officially closed) and deceased (opened). If other members of your family are still living then email find my past and let them know as this is a beach of the data
By Steve Wrack · #2912 ·
Re: 1939 Register
It¡¯s because you are still alive!
By Hilary Jackson · #2911 ·
Re: 1939 Register
Hi Derek, It could be because you are still alive ? Best wishes, Colin.
By Colin Hinson · #2910 ·
Re: 1939 Register
Because they died after 1990 Libehast
By pam beilby · #2909 ·
Re: 1939 Register
Your name is officially closed because you are still living. Hilary
By Hilary Thomas · #2908 ·
Re: 1939 Register
Hi Derek It's because you are still alive. I presume its part of the 100 year closure rule that applies to censuses...the assumption being that few people named in them will still be alive when they
By JA Woodall · #2907 ·