开云体育

Thanks Della, they are the 2 I have but having trouble finding her death. Regards, Maureen

Thanks to all you lovely people for your replies. Will look into where and if I can access any from Australia. I contacted West Yorkshire Archives but worked out expensive. It is her death I am having

You may be impressed if you get to see the original Quaker records which typically are very detailed and multi-generational. Bill Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 8:40 PM To: [email protected]

Yes unfortunately no death for her. Have written off to Leeds University Library to see what they could do.

Hannah's birth in 1771: https://www.ancestry.co.uk/discoveryui-content/view/159065:7097?tid=&pid=&queryid=c1c7ea51-5dd4-48c2-84a0-580f9a02dbdb&_phsrc=Exq69&_phstart=successSource John and Hannah's

Hannah born 4/12/1771 Askwith parish of Weston (from Ancestry)

Are you sure about it being Brighouse (which might have been the Monthly Meeting rather than the local Preparative Meeting)? And West Yorkshire Archives have relatively few Quaker records, the

Hi Maureen Her birth record is on Ancestry and her marriage is on Find My Past. If you don't have a subscription to either of these, source your local library with one and you should be able to

Hi listers, I live in Australia and would like to search the registers for births (1641-1837), marriages (1650-1836), and deaths (1656-1837). for the Brighouse Quakers, but as they are held in West

Hello everyone, I was once told that for a child to be baptized at a particular church, the family either had to have lived within the parish or have a strong connection to the parish. That person was

Only 2 new surnames added this month: BIRD CHILD If you would like to add your surname(s) to the list, please use the form at: http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/YKS/YKSlist/submit.htm *_**PLEASE

Hi Listers, I need help in my searching. I am trying to find William FARRER b.1758 (maybe) ) and his brother Joseph b. 1764 Parents were Henry FARRER and Sussanah FARRER married in Bradford Cathedral

I had not thought of that but that makes more sense Nivard.? Thanks for your thoughts. Fran

Since he was a butcher, maybe he was reckoned to be a "Quick surgeon"! Philip Hirst

Hello Fran, Perhaps that is your answer he wasn't a 'real' he was a 'butcher' but if you were happy he would operate if need be, but he couldn't call himself a surgeon because he wasn't so he is

As you rightly say it would not make sense to call himself a quack surgeon, but have you considered the enumerator might have had dealings with him and enumerated him as such? Enumerators were mostly

Guess he failed as a surgeon and was now a butcher. I made that up. Kathryne

Thanks Sue and Peter; Doesn't make sense to list oneself as a Quack on the census though. Thought there might be a different definition from so long ago. Fran

A quack doctor was surely one who dealt with quack medicines ie bogus ones. I would imagine a quack surgeon was one who was untrained, unqualified and probably somewhat dangerous in practice. Sue

This is the link to the census in question: