Re: James SYKES (b circa 1833)
Lin The 1861 census was possibly the worst kept of all the census returns and certainly in the 1950s if you went to the Public Records Office to look at the census you would have been given the
By
John Hanson
·
#3086
·
|
Some of Yorkshire's Court Records and Archives Go Online
From Eastman's Online Genealogy Newsletter, Barnsley's borough archives have been made available on family history website Ancestry... It is the first time the material has been accessible digitally
By
Lynne
·
#3085
·
|
James SYKES (b circa 1833)
James SYKES (b circa 1833) married Hannah ATKINSON (b 1837), in Castleford in 1857. I cannot find them on1861 census. I would imagine that were some between 1857 and 1862. 1911 census says she had 11
By
Lin Duke
·
#3084
·
|
Re: Thomas FLETCHER born 1756 Yorkshire
John I came across another baptism record years ago that was just as informative but I hadn't realised it was in a Dade register. I am finding that most registers of this time give very bare
By
Margaret Shearing
·
#3083
·
|
Evelyn APPLEYARD
I am reading this book (see below) I thought I would mention Evelyn (Eve) APPLEYARD She was the second wife of Joe HOBBS who owned several distilleries, the Great Glen Cattle Ranch and Inverlochy
By
Martin Briscoe (W10 laptop)
·
#3082
·
|
Re: Thomas FLETCHER born 1756 Yorkshire
Margaret You will not find a baptism register entry like that for Thomas born in 1756 ¨C likely to have father but not the mother That register in 1782 is in format known as ¡°Dade registers¡±
By
John Hanson
·
#3081
·
|
Guidelines
This group is for genealogy, family history and local history research for the county of *Yorkshire,* England. *DO* : * Give as much information as possible ie surnames, area, dates, which records you
By
Lin Duke
·
#3080
·
|
Thomas FLETCHER born 1756 Yorkshire
Hi I would welcome your thoughts in finding *Thomas FLETCHER¡¯s baptism in 1756.* Below is what I know: When I found the baptism for my 4x Gt Grandfather Thomas FLETCHER bap 1782 at Sherburn in
By
Margaret Shearing
·
#3079
·
|
Re: Joseph BENTLEY 1814-1874
Julie Just because Joseph says that his father was Jonathan doesn¡¯t mean to say that it was. At that time, you didn¡¯t need to provide any proof He would simply have been asked ¨C who was your
By
John Hanson
·
#3078
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
Thank you Lin thought that might be the case
By
Maureen Farrer
·
#3077
·
|
Joseph BENTLEY 1814-1874
I'm trying to determine who the parents of Joseph BENTLEY (1814-1874) are. He was buried at Morley Wesleyan 13 Mar 1874. He married Ann ELLIS 1 Feb 1835 in Batley and had two children. She died in
By
Julie Kane
·
#3076
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
Chris I agree with you it is probably as mistake by the transcriber. I tried to get the digital copy but said unavailable so will try again in a day as that happened a few days go for another death
By
Maureen Farrer
·
#3075
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
The transcript on FMP is wrong. The image clearly says John. I have put in a correction to FMP. Lin
By
Lin Duke
·
#3074
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
Maureen I am lucky enough to have many years of the Annual Monitor on my bookshelves so I can check the original printed copy. It says Widow of John Farrar. If FMP's transcript says Thomas, it must be
By
Chris Pitt Lewis
·
#3073
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
Dear Chris, Thank you for your very informative email. How wonderful for you to be able to find all that information which is easy if you live in UK. Unlike us poor Aussies who have to rely on things
By
Maureen Farrer
·
#3072
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
Hi Chris, I found the record for Hannah¡¯s death in the Quaker Monitor Annual, but when you look on FMP script of the record it says widow of Thomas Farrar, but in the Monitor it says John Farrar ?
By
Maureen Farrer
·
#3071
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
Thanks Ken, that if very helpful, so will look at Family Search. Regards, Maureen
By
Maureen Farrer
·
#3070
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
There is a death on 12 August 1854 which might be hers: GRO index: Hannah Farrar, 82, September Quarter 1854, Bradford and North Bierley RD 9b 60. Despite the age discrepancy, this must be the same
By
Chris Pitt Lewis
·
#3069
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
I was able to access some of my own Quaker ancestry a few years ago, and got images of the birth and marriage registers, some in Yorks (Selby area) and some in London. They were very detailed and gave
By
Ken Harrison
·
#3068
·
|
Re: Quakers Records
Death records are not part of the Quaker Meetings records. For burials you would need the parish register, or deaths if after 1837. Ken Sent: August 22, 2024 3:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject:
By
Ken Harrison
·
#3067
·
|