¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: servant


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thank you, Jane; this is useful background.

My man was admitted based on patrimony.

I still wonder how to interpret ¡°servant¡±.

Ken

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of JA Woodall via groups.io
Sent: April 13, 2025 7:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [yorksgen] servant

?

Hi Ken

?

I have ancestors who were freemen in the medieval period and it was either by trade or patrimony...ie dad was a freeman so could pass it on.?

?

??

?

This link gives useful info about how, in the 1700s freedom was bought and all kinds of workers were included so that might explain it.?

?

Hope that's useful?

?

Jane?

Chasing Wheldrake/Wheldrick/Weldrake/Weldrick...any likely variation, any time, anywhere.?

?

On Sun, 13 Apr 2025, 12:33 Ken Harrison via , <kenharrison43=[email protected]> wrote:

I know this was explained earlier, but I would appreciate a ¡°refresher¡±: I have, on the ticket admitting an ancestor as a Freeman of York in 1798, his status given as ¡°servant¡±.?

Aside from the obvious definition, what status or occupations would be included at that time in that designation?

Ken Harrison

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.