¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Walther's MP-54 kits

 

I have a kit of the MP-54 and the separate Hyatt sideframes power trucks.

The design and build of the brass power trucks are such that you'd swear they come from the place that made the Suydam trolley drives. Coined brass side frames with most of the unit made from cut or etched and folded sheet brass.

I'm referring to the drives sold in the '60's into the 70's; in the 30's, 40's and into at least part of the 50's if not into the early 60's Walthers had their own in-house power truck that I believe were mostly die-cast after the 30's.

This power truck is very similar to the brass power trucks Walthers sold for their CNS&M trolley kits.

I think they have a belt drive from the motor to the gear drive of the power axles, a classic trolley model drive.

If no one else can point to pictures of the drive, I can post some shots of mine.

Mike Bauers

On May 28, 2013, at 7:04 PM, "twilight022765" <twilight022765@...> wrote:

Many moons ago, Walther's produced an MP-54 kit, it was a wood and metal kit. It shows a drive unit for these in the instructions but it does not mention where it comes from(drive wasn't included with kit). Any suggestions what kind of drive could be used on these kits?

Mark


Re: Walther's MP-54 kits

Nathan Rich
 

Go to NSWL and look up their Stanton Drive, it comes in a few different wheelbase and wheel dimension sizes and should do nicely to power you car. Just glue on the side frames, install a decoder of your preference (if you are so inclined) and away you go.

Nathan Rich

On May 28, 2013 5:04 PM, "twilight022765" <twilight022765@...> wrote:

Many moons ago, Walther's produced an MP-54 kit, it was a wood and metal kit. It shows a drive unit for these in the instructions but it does not mention where it comes from(drive wasn't included with kit). Any suggestions what kind of drive could be used on these kits?

Mark



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
? ?

<*> Your email settings:
? ? Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
? ?
? ? (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
? ? yardbirdtrains-digest@...
? ? yardbirdtrains-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
? ? yardbirdtrains-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
? ?


Walther's MP-54 kits

 

Many moons ago, Walther's produced an MP-54 kit, it was a wood and metal kit. It shows a drive unit for these in the instructions but it does not mention where it comes from(drive wasn't included with kit). Any suggestions what kind of drive could be used on these kits?

Mark


Re: [traintools] FWD: Floquil, Polly Scale, Pactra, ColorArtz paints being discontinued

 

en lieu of this unhappy news, what are the alternatives, if any? Guess we'll looking at Testor's military colors???

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., Nathan Rich <thaddeusthudpucker@...> wrote:

It's toast either way... Scalpers selling it for $10 a bottle by fall or
Walthers starting to sell it for $10 next year.

Nathan Rich
On May 24, 2013 2:18 PM, "kbkchooch" <kbkchooch@...> wrote:

If Walthers buys them, look for Floquil to cost about 10 bucks a bottle!
:-O


--- In yardbirdtrains@..., "Rob" <rrdeffinger@> wrote:

Wow! Never realized that Testor was the manufacturer of all those
brands. Have to stock up. Have you ever figured up what a gallon of their
paint costs when you have to buy it at a half ounce at a time?
And you think gas is expensive!
Maybe Walthers will buy them. They make everything else.
BobD.

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., "Henry" <long95209@> wrote:

Oh my , well there's another speed bump up ahead ? Rapidly escalating
regulations ? Diminishing returns ? Socialised programs ? No surprise sadly
! Rats ! Henry


--- In yardbirdtrains@..., Walter Bayer II <bayerw2@>
wrote:

With apologies to Rich, I thought this important enough to forward to
several more Model RR communities.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rich Zellich <rich@>
Date: Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:35 AM
Subject: [traintools] FWD: Floquil, Polly Scale, Pactra, ColorArtz
paints
being discontinued
To: traintools@...


**


----- Forwarded Message -----
Subject: Floquil and Polly scale to cease production...

Hello to all...

It appears that we will be loosing Floquil, Polly Scale, Pactra and
ColorArtz paints and that they will no longer be produced. It
doesn't look
as if anyone is going to pick up the brands either from what was
being
stated on the other list. My hobby painting and custom painting
business is
going to take a hit. Looks like I will be buying up big whilst they
are
still around......

The below is a direct quote and response from Testors Consumer
Affairs
Department...

"Dear Mr. ________

There are many changes taking place at The Testor Corporation. For
over 80
years, we have provided premium paints and finishing systems to the
craft
and hobby industry. Recently we announced that we are transforming
our
business in order to more effectively address the changing needs of
our
consumers and their interests.

We ve made the decision to exit the following businesses within the
Testor
Brand family - Pactra , Floquil , PollyScale , and ColorArtz .
This will enable The Testor Corporation to return to our foundation
of
success providing premium, innovative product that inspires
creativity.
We will continue to accept orders and ship product for a limited
time based
on available quantities.

Going forward, the following brands will be critical to our success
and
development - Testor , Model Master , and Aztek. These brands will be
infused with marketing support, innovation and operational
efficiencies.

In support of this, we have announced a consolidation of operations
at our
Rockford facilities. Our commitment to the Testor brand has never
been
stronger. By implementing these changes, and the ability to leverage
all
of Rust-Oleum s world class services, we are more strongly poised to
take
our business to the next level through product and merchandising
innovations, and increased customer understanding.

If you have further questions, please feel free to let us know.

We appreciate your business!!

Sincerely,
Beth

The Testor Corporation
Consumer Affairs Department
1-800-837-8677 (1-800-testors)
M-F 8:00 A.M - 4:00 PM CST"





--
Regards,
Walter



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links




Re: Finding Response I Made to 'Sender'

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks John,

As I said, I used the ¡®Reply to Sender¡¯ link at the bottom of the comment.? I thought I would find a ¡®Sent¡¯ link when I signed in to my Yahoo page, but couldn¡¯t.? I did find it

in my sent box.? In any event, this person has not responded to it, and I¡¯ve gotten rejects on the personal email address I had for him.? Maybe he isn¡¯t interested.

Denis


Re: K4 Altoona ?

 

Ray,
? ? ?Thanks for filling in the gap from the end of the 2nd restoration attempt until now. I was unaware that the boiler was deemed useless (although I am not surprised). As I mentioned, there are some folks that have been alienated (to say the least) by the whole affair. I've heard lots of scuttlebutt about various folks in both Altoona and Steamtown who, at the very least, dropped the ball on the project by simply getting involved without knowing what they were getting into. Each time a new person or group got a crack at the job, the previous group was forced to relinquish the job and, thus, animosity has spread and supporters have splintered. Actually there has been pride, politics and just plain bad blood involved that actually harkens back to the days when the PRR was putting together their steam locomotive collection and, later, why it ended up in Strasburg instead of Altoona. I don't know every detail but, as you all can now see, it exists.?
? ? ?Sadly there are many people who can't or won't let go of what has already transpired. Ray alluded to possible criminal activities essentially because money was spent with no results. All I can say to that is hindsight is 20/20. Just throwing "x" amount of money at something doesn't ever guarantee you'll get the desired result in anything. Additionally, it is too easy to look back and attach the moniker of "fraud" to people who had good intentions (although I have heard of some shenanigans going on with funds that were earmarked for the K-4). Regardless, the simple truth is that, no matter what money has already been spent, where it went and who may be held responsible for what, IF anyone wants to see the K-4 run again, a new boiler will have to be built from scratch and that will require even more money. There is no getting around that. ?-- ? Jeff?
?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Breyer
To: yardbirdtrains
Sent: Tue, May 28, 2013 7:22 am
Subject: RE: [yardbirdtrains] Re: K4 Altoona ?

?
Hi Henry,

Jeff left out one important piece of information: the boiler of 1361 is
unusable. The Pennsy designed her with long flexible staybolts and a certain
thickness to the firebox steel. At some point in the late 1930s/early 1940s,
the Pennsy decided to economize, and changed the staybolt design by
eliminating washers, instead peening over the ends to create in integral
washer. They also eliminated a few of them. That design change, coupled with
a near 100 year old boiler that's been exposed to the elements for a LONG
time, makes it 100% not usable. Something like a million dollars of taxpayer
money got sunk into the second rebuild until an engineer (on the third group
of people attempting the second rebuild) actually crunched some numbers and
discovered that the boiler was dangerous. VERY dangerous.

As-is, 1361 will never run again, even if they do reassemble her. Someone
will have to come up with another $2 million or so to build a new K-4 boiler
from scratch to get her to run again. That's JUST the boiler cost.

Altoona is keeping mum about all of this simply because $2M of PA taxpayer
money right now has been 100% wasted by them on schlock rebuild attempts.
They're keeping their head low because of public backlash, political
backlash, and possible criminal charges of fraud. The problems with the
engine are completely known among the restoration crowd. There's LOTS of
threads about all of this at the RYPN website.

The problem with the restoration isn't the engine itself, nor where to run
her. A LIRR Ten Wheeler that's just as old just got sent to Strasburg for a
rebuild, and that engine will be running in five years so long as the
fundraising effort goes well. Older engines have been restored recently,
larger engines have been restored in open fields, the Brits regularly take
junkyard scrap and get them to run, and Klocke Loco Works is cranking out
brand new Americans at a rate of one every three years. The problem is with
WHO did the restoration: get good people with a clear plan, good funding,
and professionals to direct traffic, and everything goes smoothly. Get fools
on the job taking shortcuts, playing politics, and generally not knowing
what the hell they're doing, and you ends up with a mess like this (or sort
of similarly, like North Freedom, which hasn't run a steam engine since
1998, and which has wasted about the same amount of money on THREE
restoration attempts).

Regards,
Ray Breyer
Elgin, IL

-----Original Message-----
From: yardbirdtrains@... [mailto:yardbirdtrains@...]
On Behalf Of Henry
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 2:03 PM
To: yardbirdtrains@...
Subject: [yardbirdtrains] Re: K4 Altoona ?

So, somebody has to build a fire under the proper people ? Henry

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., Jeff Pellas wrote:
>
> Henry,
> The saga of the 1361 is a very long and complicated. Several entities
and organizations have had a crack at it; Sometimes this was for funding
reasons and sometimes just because the project has taken so long, people
have come and gone.
> Some of the problems of the K-4 stem from the selection process when
it was originally preserved. Basically the locomotive was the easiest one on
the dead line to get to. So it is by chance that the 1361 is one of the very
oldest K-4s they could have chosen, having been built in 1917. It was 10
years old when the last K-4s began their service lives in 1927. Also the
1361 was one of the very last K-4s in service (retired in 1957) so that
locomotive was as beaten down and worn out a machine as you could imagine.
Those who set aside the 1361 were not thinking about a 2nd life for the
locomotive pulling excursions.
> Never the less, the loco was taken down from Horseshoe Curve in the
spring of 1987 (I was there as an 18 year old) and, after receiving a
cleaning, new coat of paint and a few safety upgrades, she began that 2nd
life hauling excursions over Conrail. The new career was cut short when she
broke the axle on the main driver after only a few months.
> I lost track of the K-4 saga for a few years after that because I
entered college but at some point the decision was made to completely
restore it. A group started the restoration at Steam Town in Scranton but,
after some time and work and because of the influx of Government funds, the
restoration had to be scuttled and begun all over again, this time using a
very protracted and methodical process which would eventually completely
restore/renew practically every piece of the locomotive. Each piece was
systematically removed, measured, tested for soundness and remade if
necessary (and it was almost always necessary). I believe most, if not all
of the major restoration work was actually completed using this method.
During that time, the 130P75 tender was modified by removing the retractable
water scoop. There are no track pans existing so the machinery was removed
to create more space to hold water.
> Here's where my knowledge is hazy but what I gather happened next is
that the government funding dried up and the various parts of the K-4 simply
languished in storage. Meanwhile the Altoona Railroaders Memorial Museum
went through at least a one reorganization upsetting and disenfranchising
various folks along the way (which is inevitable, I suppose). During this
time the K-4 was reacquired from Steamtown but the Altoona Museum did not
have a place to store all the parts, let alone a fully assembled locomotive.
Some of the pieces are definitely in Altoona but I'm told other parts are
being stored at the East Broad Top RR and possibly other places.
> The current regime in Altoona pledged to finish the K-4 restoration
once they had a structure in place to house the loco. To this end they have,
within the past year, erected a partial roundhouse on the museum grounds. If
the previous work on the K-4 really was mostly completed, there really
shouldn't be much more restoration that has to be done. Most of the
remaining work consists of putting the bleeding thing back together! I am
cautiously optimistic the locomotive will be ready for it's centennial in
2017.
> By the way, if you are planning to model the 1361, the Penn
Line/Bowser locomotive is not the greatest place to start. The early K-4s
were constructed with fabricated frames. The last run of K-4s in 1927 had
cast steel frames which were about 2 1/2 ft shorter than the fabricated
frame of earlier locos (like 1361). The Penn Line model loco is based on
drawings of the 1927 K-4s. I once compared the lengths of a Penn Line K-4
with a Key Brass K-4 and the PL loco matched the cast frame loco length
perfectly while the Key matched the fabricated frame length.
>
> Jeff
>
> jppellas@...
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry > To: yardbirdtrains <yardbirdtrains@...>
> Sent: Thu, May 23, 2013 11:36 am
> Subject: [yardbirdtrains] K4 Altoona ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> OK what's the story with that Jeff ? Big Bucks ? Sell it to the Ohio
Central ? Tarp that tender ? Henry
>
> --- In yardbirdtrains@..., Jeff Pellas wrote:
> >
> > Was in Altoona today to see the 765. Sadly, just a little ways away from
the Altoona station platform is the Altoona Railroaders Memorial Museum
where the rusting tender for the K-4 is parked. Seeing the 765 makes me long
for the K-4 to run again ...but will it ever?
> >
> >
> > Jeff
> > jppellas@
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henry
> > To: yardbirdtrains <yardbirdtrains@...>
> > Sent: Sun, May 19, 2013 10:58 am
> > Subject: [yardbirdtrains] NS rr steam train ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I punched up Railpicturea.net this AM . Lo' and behold , there was NKP
765 Berkshire type on Horseshoe Curve . Those that can , go look ? Thanks NS
. Henry
> >
>

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: K4 Altoona ?

 

A whole new boiler?? The staybolts are all in the firebox. The problem is confined to the?roof sheet of the firebox.?Check with the Strasburg shop to see how they are dealing with the G5s.? No total boiler replacement.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Breyer
To: yardbirdtrains
Sent: Tue, May 28, 2013 9:33 am
Subject: RE: [yardbirdtrains] Re: K4 Altoona ?

Hi Henry,

Jeff left out one important piece of information: the boiler of 1361 is
unusable. The Pennsy designed her with long flexible staybolts and a certain
thickness to the firebox steel. At some point in the late 1930s/early 1940s,
the Pennsy decided to economize, and changed the staybolt design by
eliminating washers, instead peening over the ends to create in integral
washer. They also eliminated a few of them. That design change, coupled with
a near 100 year old boiler that's been exposed to the elements for a LONG
time, makes it 100% not usable. Something like a million dollars of taxpayer
money got sunk into the second rebuild until an engineer (on the third group
of people attempting the second rebuild) actually crunched some numbers and
discovered that the boiler was dangerous. VERY dangerous.

As-is, 1361 will never run again, even if they do reassemble her. Someone
will have to come up with another $2 million or so to build a new K-4 boiler
from scratch to get her to run again. That's JUST the boiler cost.

Altoona is keeping mum about all of this simply because $2M of PA taxpayer
money right now has been 100% wasted by them on schlock rebuild attempts.
They're keeping their head low because of public backlash, political
backlash, and possible criminal charges of fraud. The problems with the
engine are completely known among the restoration crowd. There's LOTS of
threads about all of this at the RYPN website.

The problem with the restoration isn't the engine itself, nor where to run
her. A LIRR Ten Wheeler that's just as old just got sent to Strasburg for a
rebuild, and that engine will be running in five years so long as the
fundraising effort goes well. Older engines have been restored recently,
larger engines have been restored in open fields, the Brits regularly take
junkyard scrap and get them to run, and Klocke Loco Works is cranking out
brand new Americans at a rate of one every three years. The problem is with
WHO did the restoration: get good people with a clear plan, good funding,
and professionals to direct traffic, and everything goes smoothly. Get fools
on the job taking shortcuts, playing politics, and generally not knowing
what the hell they're doing, and you ends up with a mess like this (or sort
of similarly, like North Freedom, which hasn't run a steam engine since
1998, and which has wasted about the same amount of money on THREE
restoration attempts).

Regards,
Ray Breyer
Elgin, IL



-----Original Message-----
From: yardbirdtrains@... [mailto:yardbirdtrains@...]
On Behalf Of Henry
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 2:03 PM
To: yardbirdtrains@...
Subject: [yardbirdtrains] Re: K4 Altoona ?

 So, somebody has to build a fire under the proper people ?  Henry

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., Jeff Pellas  wrote:
>
> Henry,
>      The saga of the 1361 is a very long and complicated. Several entities
and organizations have had a crack at it; Sometimes this was for funding
reasons and sometimes just because the project has taken so long, people
have come and gone.
>      Some of the problems of the K-4 stem from the selection process when
it was originally preserved. Basically the locomotive was the easiest one on
the dead line to get to. So it is by chance that the 1361 is one of the very
oldest K-4s they could have chosen, having been built in 1917. It was 10
years old when the last K-4s began their service lives in 1927. Also the
1361 was one of the very last K-4s in service (retired in 1957) so that
locomotive was as beaten down and worn out a machine as you could imagine.
Those who set aside the 1361 were not thinking about a 2nd life for the
locomotive pulling excursions.
>      Never the less, the loco was taken down from Horseshoe Curve in the
spring of 1987 (I was there as an 18 year old) and, after receiving a
cleaning, new coat of paint and a few safety upgrades, she began that 2nd
life hauling excursions over Conrail. The new career was cut short when she
broke the axle on the main driver after only a few months.
>      I lost track of the K-4 saga for a few years after that because I
entered college but at some point the decision was made to completely
restore it. A group started the restoration at Steam Town in Scranton but,
after some time and work and because of the influx of Government funds, the
restoration had to be scuttled and begun all over again, this time using a
very protracted and methodical process which would eventually completely
restore/renew practically every piece of the locomotive. Each piece was
systematically removed, measured, tested for soundness and remade if
necessary (and it was almost always necessary).  I believe most, if not all
of the major restoration work was actually completed using this method.
During that time, the 130P75 tender was modified by removing the retractable
water scoop. There are no track pans existing so the machinery was removed
to create more space to hold water.
>      Here's where my knowledge is hazy but what I gather happened next is
that the government funding dried up and the various parts of the K-4 simply
languished in storage. Meanwhile the Altoona Railroaders Memorial Museum
went through at least a one reorganization upsetting and disenfranchising
various folks along the way (which is inevitable, I suppose). During this
time the K-4 was reacquired from Steamtown but the Altoona Museum did not
have a place to store all the parts, let alone a fully assembled locomotive.
Some of the pieces are definitely in Altoona but I'm told other parts are
being stored at the East Broad Top RR and possibly other places.
>      The current regime in Altoona pledged to finish the K-4 restoration
once they had a structure in place to house the loco. To this end they have,
within the past year, erected a partial roundhouse on the museum grounds. If
the previous work on the K-4 really was mostly completed, there really
shouldn't be much more restoration that has to be done. Most of the
remaining work consists of putting the bleeding thing back together!  I am
cautiously optimistic the locomotive will be ready for it's centennial in
2017.
>      By the way, if you are planning to model the 1361, the Penn
Line/Bowser locomotive is not the greatest place to start. The early K-4s
were constructed with fabricated frames. The last run of K-4s in 1927 had
cast steel frames which were about 2 1/2 ft shorter than the fabricated
frame of earlier locos (like 1361). The Penn Line model loco is based on
drawings of the 1927 K-4s. I once compared the lengths of a Penn Line K-4
with a Key Brass K-4 and the PL loco matched the cast frame loco length
perfectly while the Key matched the fabricated frame length.
>
> Jeff
>
> jppellas@...
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry 
> To: yardbirdtrains <yardbirdtrains@...>
> Sent: Thu, May 23, 2013 11:36 am
> Subject: [yardbirdtrains] K4 Altoona ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> OK what's the story with that Jeff ? Big Bucks ? Sell it to the Ohio
Central ? Tarp that tender ?  Henry
>
> --- In yardbirdtrains@..., Jeff Pellas  wrote:
> >
> > Was in Altoona today to see the 765. Sadly, just a little ways away from
the Altoona station platform is the Altoona Railroaders Memorial Museum
where the rusting tender for the K-4 is parked. Seeing the 765 makes me long
for the K-4 to run again ...but will it ever?
> >
> >
> > Jeff
> > jppellas@
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henry 
> > To: yardbirdtrains <yardbirdtrains@...>
> > Sent: Sun, May 19, 2013 10:58 am
> > Subject: [yardbirdtrains] NS rr steam train ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  I punched up Railpicturea.net this AM . Lo' and behold , there was NKP
765 Berkshire type on Horseshoe Curve . Those that can , go look ? Thanks NS
. Henry
> >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    yardbirdtrains-digest@...
    yardbirdtrains-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    yardbirdtrains-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    


Re: K4 Altoona ?

Ray Breyer
 

Hi Henry,

Jeff left out one important piece of information: the boiler of 1361 is
unusable. The Pennsy designed her with long flexible staybolts and a certain
thickness to the firebox steel. At some point in the late 1930s/early 1940s,
the Pennsy decided to economize, and changed the staybolt design by
eliminating washers, instead peening over the ends to create in integral
washer. They also eliminated a few of them. That design change, coupled with
a near 100 year old boiler that's been exposed to the elements for a LONG
time, makes it 100% not usable. Something like a million dollars of taxpayer
money got sunk into the second rebuild until an engineer (on the third group
of people attempting the second rebuild) actually crunched some numbers and
discovered that the boiler was dangerous. VERY dangerous.

As-is, 1361 will never run again, even if they do reassemble her. Someone
will have to come up with another $2 million or so to build a new K-4 boiler
from scratch to get her to run again. That's JUST the boiler cost.

Altoona is keeping mum about all of this simply because $2M of PA taxpayer
money right now has been 100% wasted by them on schlock rebuild attempts.
They're keeping their head low because of public backlash, political
backlash, and possible criminal charges of fraud. The problems with the
engine are completely known among the restoration crowd. There's LOTS of
threads about all of this at the RYPN website.

The problem with the restoration isn't the engine itself, nor where to run
her. A LIRR Ten Wheeler that's just as old just got sent to Strasburg for a
rebuild, and that engine will be running in five years so long as the
fundraising effort goes well. Older engines have been restored recently,
larger engines have been restored in open fields, the Brits regularly take
junkyard scrap and get them to run, and Klocke Loco Works is cranking out
brand new Americans at a rate of one every three years. The problem is with
WHO did the restoration: get good people with a clear plan, good funding,
and professionals to direct traffic, and everything goes smoothly. Get fools
on the job taking shortcuts, playing politics, and generally not knowing
what the hell they're doing, and you ends up with a mess like this (or sort
of similarly, like North Freedom, which hasn't run a steam engine since
1998, and which has wasted about the same amount of money on THREE
restoration attempts).

Regards,
Ray Breyer
Elgin, IL

-----Original Message-----
From: yardbirdtrains@... [mailto:yardbirdtrains@...]
On Behalf Of Henry
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 2:03 PM
To: yardbirdtrains@...
Subject: [yardbirdtrains] Re: K4 Altoona ?

So, somebody has to build a fire under the proper people ? Henry

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., Jeff Pellas <jppellas@...> wrote:

Henry,
The saga of the 1361 is a very long and complicated. Several entities
and organizations have had a crack at it; Sometimes this was for funding
reasons and sometimes just because the project has taken so long, people
have come and gone.
Some of the problems of the K-4 stem from the selection process when
it was originally preserved. Basically the locomotive was the easiest one on
the dead line to get to. So it is by chance that the 1361 is one of the very
oldest K-4s they could have chosen, having been built in 1917. It was 10
years old when the last K-4s began their service lives in 1927. Also the
1361 was one of the very last K-4s in service (retired in 1957) so that
locomotive was as beaten down and worn out a machine as you could imagine.
Those who set aside the 1361 were not thinking about a 2nd life for the
locomotive pulling excursions.
Never the less, the loco was taken down from Horseshoe Curve in the
spring of 1987 (I was there as an 18 year old) and, after receiving a
cleaning, new coat of paint and a few safety upgrades, she began that 2nd
life hauling excursions over Conrail. The new career was cut short when she
broke the axle on the main driver after only a few months.
I lost track of the K-4 saga for a few years after that because I
entered college but at some point the decision was made to completely
restore it. A group started the restoration at Steam Town in Scranton but,
after some time and work and because of the influx of Government funds, the
restoration had to be scuttled and begun all over again, this time using a
very protracted and methodical process which would eventually completely
restore/renew practically every piece of the locomotive. Each piece was
systematically removed, measured, tested for soundness and remade if
necessary (and it was almost always necessary). I believe most, if not all
of the major restoration work was actually completed using this method.
During that time, the 130P75 tender was modified by removing the retractable
water scoop. There are no track pans existing so the machinery was removed
to create more space to hold water.
Here's where my knowledge is hazy but what I gather happened next is
that the government funding dried up and the various parts of the K-4 simply
languished in storage. Meanwhile the Altoona Railroaders Memorial Museum
went through at least a one reorganization upsetting and disenfranchising
various folks along the way (which is inevitable, I suppose). During this
time the K-4 was reacquired from Steamtown but the Altoona Museum did not
have a place to store all the parts, let alone a fully assembled locomotive.
Some of the pieces are definitely in Altoona but I'm told other parts are
being stored at the East Broad Top RR and possibly other places.
The current regime in Altoona pledged to finish the K-4 restoration
once they had a structure in place to house the loco. To this end they have,
within the past year, erected a partial roundhouse on the museum grounds. If
the previous work on the K-4 really was mostly completed, there really
shouldn't be much more restoration that has to be done. Most of the
remaining work consists of putting the bleeding thing back together! I am
cautiously optimistic the locomotive will be ready for it's centennial in
2017.
By the way, if you are planning to model the 1361, the Penn
Line/Bowser locomotive is not the greatest place to start. The early K-4s
were constructed with fabricated frames. The last run of K-4s in 1927 had
cast steel frames which were about 2 1/2 ft shorter than the fabricated
frame of earlier locos (like 1361). The Penn Line model loco is based on
drawings of the 1927 K-4s. I once compared the lengths of a Penn Line K-4
with a Key Brass K-4 and the PL loco matched the cast frame loco length
perfectly while the Key matched the fabricated frame length.

Jeff

jppellas@...




-----Original Message-----
From: Henry <long95209@...>
To: yardbirdtrains <yardbirdtrains@...>
Sent: Thu, May 23, 2013 11:36 am
Subject: [yardbirdtrains] K4 Altoona ?






OK what's the story with that Jeff ? Big Bucks ? Sell it to the Ohio
Central ? Tarp that tender ? Henry

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., Jeff Pellas <jppellas@> wrote:

Was in Altoona today to see the 765. Sadly, just a little ways away from
the Altoona station platform is the Altoona Railroaders Memorial Museum
where the rusting tender for the K-4 is parked. Seeing the 765 makes me long
for the K-4 to run again ...but will it ever?


Jeff
jppellas@




-----Original Message-----
From: Henry <long95209@>
To: yardbirdtrains <yardbirdtrains@...>
Sent: Sun, May 19, 2013 10:58 am
Subject: [yardbirdtrains] NS rr steam train ?






I punched up Railpicturea.net this AM . Lo' and behold , there was NKP
765 Berkshire type on Horseshoe Curve . Those that can , go look ? Thanks NS
. Henry



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Memorial day ?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

AMEN!!!

?

John Hagen

?

From: yardbirdtrains@... [mailto:yardbirdtrains@...] On Behalf Of Henry
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 8:00 PM
To: yardbirdtrains@...
Subject: [yardbirdtrains] Memorial day ?

?

?

Thanks to all of the Vets and all who serve now ! Thanks for your service ! Hoo-Rah !! Henry US Navy 1962-1966 Bird Farms !


Memorial day ?

Henry
 

Thanks to all of the Vets and all who serve now ! Thanks for your service ! Hoo-Rah !! Henry US Navy 1962-1966 Bird Farms !


Re: Athearn Genesis 2-8-2 Repair Update

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

That¡¯s great news!

?

I¡¯ve met Harvey, and he has done work for me.? I would use him again.

Denis


Re: Finding Response I Made to 'Sender'

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Have you tried going to the website and doing a message search using you screen name? That should show any and all posts you made to the group.

?

If you sent it directly to the inquirer you are basically s.o.l unless you have a ¡°Sent¡± folder in your email program.

?

John Hagen

?

From: yardbirdtrains@... [mailto:yardbirdtrains@...] On Behalf Of Henry
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 10:29 AM
To: yardbirdtrains@...
Subject: [yardbirdtrains] Re: Finding Response I Made to 'Sender'

?

?

You know just once in a while ? It seems that yahoo "misplaces" emails ? I haven't deleted any thing in a while ? Sometimes I delete archived stuff from the server , but not lately ? By me ? Frustrating as hell isn't it ? Sorry mon ami . Henry

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., "DenisL" <avanti78@...> wrote:
>
> Hey Henry,
> I've spent the last twenty minutes trying to find a response I made to a member's comment. I was trying to help this person out.
> I have been unable to find my response.
> Any help?
>


Re: Finding Response I Made to 'Sender'

Henry
 

You know just once in a while ? It seems that yahoo "misplaces" emails ? I haven't deleted any thing in a while ? Sometimes I delete archived stuff from the server , but not lately ? By me ? Frustrating as hell isn't it ? Sorry mon ami . Henry

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., "DenisL" <avanti78@...> wrote:

Hey Henry,
I've spent the last twenty minutes trying to find a response I made to a member's comment. I was trying to help this person out.
I have been unable to find my response.
Any help?


Re: K4 Altoona ?

Henry
 

So, somebody has to build a fire under the proper people ? Henry

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., Jeff Pellas <jppellas@...> wrote:

Henry,
The saga of the 1361 is a very long and complicated. Several entities and organizations have had a crack at it; Sometimes this was for funding reasons and sometimes just because the project has taken so long, people have come and gone.
Some of the problems of the K-4 stem from the selection process when it was originally preserved. Basically the locomotive was the easiest one on the dead line to get to. So it is by chance that the 1361 is one of the very oldest K-4s they could have chosen, having been built in 1917. It was 10 years old when the last K-4s began their service lives in 1927. Also the 1361 was one of the very last K-4s in service (retired in 1957) so that locomotive was as beaten down and worn out a machine as you could imagine. Those who set aside the 1361 were not thinking about a 2nd life for the locomotive pulling excursions.
Never the less, the loco was taken down from Horseshoe Curve in the spring of 1987 (I was there as an 18 year old) and, after receiving a cleaning, new coat of paint and a few safety upgrades, she began that 2nd life hauling excursions over Conrail. The new career was cut short when she broke the axle on the main driver after only a few months.
I lost track of the K-4 saga for a few years after that because I entered college but at some point the decision was made to completely restore it. A group started the restoration at Steam Town in Scranton but, after some time and work and because of the influx of Government funds, the restoration had to be scuttled and begun all over again, this time using a very protracted and methodical process which would eventually completely restore/renew practically every piece of the locomotive. Each piece was systematically removed, measured, tested for soundness and remade if necessary (and it was almost always necessary). I believe most, if not all of the major restoration work was actually completed using this method. During that time, the 130P75 tender was modified by removing the retractable water scoop. There are no track pans existing so the machinery was removed to create more space to hold water.
Here's where my knowledge is hazy but what I gather happened next is that the government funding dried up and the various parts of the K-4 simply languished in storage. Meanwhile the Altoona Railroaders Memorial Museum went through at least a one reorganization upsetting and disenfranchising various folks along the way (which is inevitable, I suppose). During this time the K-4 was reacquired from Steamtown but the Altoona Museum did not have a place to store all the parts, let alone a fully assembled locomotive. Some of the pieces are definitely in Altoona but I'm told other parts are being stored at the East Broad Top RR and possibly other places.
The current regime in Altoona pledged to finish the K-4 restoration once they had a structure in place to house the loco. To this end they have, within the past year, erected a partial roundhouse on the museum grounds. If the previous work on the K-4 really was mostly completed, there really shouldn't be much more restoration that has to be done. Most of the remaining work consists of putting the bleeding thing back together! I am cautiously optimistic the locomotive will be ready for it's centennial in 2017.
By the way, if you are planning to model the 1361, the Penn Line/Bowser locomotive is not the greatest place to start. The early K-4s were constructed with fabricated frames. The last run of K-4s in 1927 had cast steel frames which were about 2 1/2 ft shorter than the fabricated frame of earlier locos (like 1361). The Penn Line model loco is based on drawings of the 1927 K-4s. I once compared the lengths of a Penn Line K-4 with a Key Brass K-4 and the PL loco matched the cast frame loco length perfectly while the Key matched the fabricated frame length.

Jeff

jppellas@...




-----Original Message-----
From: Henry <long95209@...>
To: yardbirdtrains <yardbirdtrains@...>
Sent: Thu, May 23, 2013 11:36 am
Subject: [yardbirdtrains] K4 Altoona ?






OK what's the story with that Jeff ? Big Bucks ? Sell it to the Ohio Central ? Tarp that tender ? Henry

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., Jeff Pellas <jppellas@> wrote:

Was in Altoona today to see the 765. Sadly, just a little ways away from the Altoona station platform is the Altoona Railroaders Memorial Museum where the rusting tender for the K-4 is parked. Seeing the 765 makes me long for the K-4 to run again ...but will it ever?


Jeff
jppellas@




-----Original Message-----
From: Henry <long95209@>
To: yardbirdtrains <yardbirdtrains@...>
Sent: Sun, May 19, 2013 10:58 am
Subject: [yardbirdtrains] NS rr steam train ?






I punched up Railpicturea.net this AM . Lo' and behold , there was NKP 765 Berkshire type on Horseshoe Curve . Those that can , go look ? Thanks NS . Henry


Re: Finding Response I Made to 'Sender'

Henry
 

No worries , we're all trying to get by ? This tecno stuff is great , when it works . Or when I can remember how to run it ? Henry

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., "DenisL" <avanti78@...> wrote:

Henry,
I found the response in my own 'sent' emails. Thought I would find on the forum.
Denis

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., "DenisL" <avanti78@> wrote:

Hey Henry,
I've spent the last twenty minutes trying to find a response I made to a member's comment. I was trying to help this person out.
I have been unable to find my response.
Any help?


Re: Finding Response I Made to 'Sender'

 

Henry,
I found the response in my own 'sent' emails. Thought I would find on the forum.
Denis

--- In yardbirdtrains@..., "DenisL" <avanti78@...> wrote:

Hey Henry,
I've spent the last twenty minutes trying to find a response I made to a member's comment. I was trying to help this person out.
I have been unable to find my response.
Any help?


Finding Response I Made to 'Sender'

 

Hey Henry,
I've spent the last twenty minutes trying to find a response I made to a member's comment. I was trying to help this person out.
I have been unable to find my response.
Any help?


Re: K4 Altoona ?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Nice history, Jeff.

Denis


Athearn Genesis 2-8-2 Repair Update

 

After hearing advise from a lot of you, I have sent the engine to Harvey's Train Service & Repair in Hollister, MO. Harvey called me yesterday said that he can fix it for me if I supply the gear. I purchased the gear from NWSL and they are shipping it directly to Harvey. The cost of the repair will be about $60.00 The other good news is I contacted the EBay Vendor I purchased it from and they have refunded me the cost of the repair!!! Thanks to all of you for pointing me in the right direction!

It's just a little sad that Athearn is not as responsive as you guys.


Re: [traintools] FWD: Floquil, Polly Scale, Pactra, ColorArtz paints being discontinued

Nathan Rich
 

It's toast either way... Scalpers selling it for $10 a bottle by fall or Walthers starting to sell it for $10 next year.

Nathan Rich

On May 24, 2013 2:18 PM, "kbkchooch" <kbkchooch@...> wrote:

If Walthers buys them, look for Floquil to cost about 10 bucks a bottle!
:-O


--- In yardbirdtrains@..., "Rob" wrote:
>
> Wow! ?Never realized that Testor was the manufacturer of all those brands. ?Have to stock up. Have you ever figured up what a gallon of their paint costs when you have to buy it at a half ounce at a time?
> And you think gas is expensive!
> Maybe Walthers will buy them. They make everything else.
> BobD.
>
> --- In yardbirdtrains@..., "Henry" wrote:
> >
> > Oh my , well there's another speed bump up ahead ? Rapidly escalating regulations ? Diminishing returns ? Socialised programs ? No surprise sadly ! Rats ! ?Henry
> >
> >
> > --- In yardbirdtrains@..., Walter Bayer II wrote:
> > >
> > > With apologies to Rich, I thought this important enough to forward to
> > > several more Model RR communities.
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Rich Zellich
> > > Date: Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:35 AM
> > > Subject: [traintools] FWD: Floquil, Polly Scale, Pactra, ColorArtz paints
> > > being discontinued
> > > To: traintools@...
> > >
> > >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Forwarded Message -----
> > > Subject: Floquil and Polly scale to cease production...
> > >
> > > Hello to all...
> > >
> > > It appears that we will be loosing Floquil, Polly Scale, Pactra and
> > > ColorArtz paints and that they will no longer be produced. It doesn't look
> > > as if anyone is going to pick up the brands either from what was being
> > > stated on the other list. My hobby painting and custom painting business is
> > > going to take a hit. Looks like I will be buying up big whilst they are
> > > still around......
> > >
> > > The below is a direct quote and response from Testors Consumer Affairs
> > > Department...
> > >
> > > "Dear Mr. ________
> > >
> > > There are many changes taking place at The Testor Corporation. For over 80
> > > years, we have provided premium paints and finishing systems to the craft
> > > and hobby industry. Recently we announced that we are transforming our
> > > business in order to more effectively address the changing needs of our
> > > consumers and their interests.
> > >
> > > We ve made the decision to exit the following businesses within the Testor
> > > Brand family - Pactra , Floquil , PollyScale , and ColorArtz .
> > > This will enable The Testor Corporation to return to our foundation of
> > > success providing premium, innovative product that inspires creativity.
> > > We will continue to accept orders and ship product for a limited time based
> > > on available quantities.
> > >
> > > Going forward, the following brands will be critical to our success and
> > > development - Testor , Model Master , and Aztek. These brands will be
> > > infused with marketing support, innovation and operational efficiencies.
> > >
> > > In support of this, we have announced a consolidation of operations at our
> > > Rockford facilities. Our commitment to the Testor brand has never been
> > > stronger. By implementing these changes, and the ability to leverage all
> > > of Rust-Oleum s world class services, we are more strongly poised to take
> > > our business to the next level through product and merchandising
> > > innovations, and increased customer understanding.
> > >
> > > If you have further questions, please feel free to let us know.
> > >
> > > We appreciate your business!!
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Beth
> > >
> > > The Testor Corporation
> > > Consumer Affairs Department
> > > 1-800-837-8677 (1-800-testors)
> > > M-F 8:00 A.M - 4:00 PM CST"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Walter
> > >
> >
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
? ?

<*> Your email settings:
? ? Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
? ?
? ? (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
? ? yardbirdtrains-digest@...
? ? yardbirdtrains-fullfeatured@...

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
? ? yardbirdtrains-unsubscribe@...

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
? ?