Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Re: Traffic on Upper Westmoreland
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI'd like to add few general observations/suggestions/questions about traffic. ?George, I'm so sorry to hear about so much damage. I think most folks, but clearly not all, have a driveway on that part of Westmoreland. My suggestion will be unpopular, but it seems that part of the answer of crowded streets should be incentivizing those with driveways on busy streets to fully use them. For example, the city could charge residents with driveways a heftier fee for their zoned parking sticker. The fee should be set at a level that makes tandem parking worth the hassle. While I often see one car in a driveway, I rarely see anyone tandem parked. This tells me that the fee isn't set at a level that incentivizes them to park their second car in their driveway.? Roger, maybe I missed something, but if folks are looking for parking on Westmoreland before patronizing the downtown businesses, that seems odd. There is a gigantic public parking lot right there in the middle of downtown, free for the first hour. Maybe there need to be more signs telling visitors it exists? If circling is a problem, perhaps improving signage is a low-cost way to start. Regarding rolling stops and the intersection of Elm and Pine, there is a parking/visibility issue at that corner and also at the corner of Elm and Allegheny. Folks park so close to the intersections that turning cars must turn into the oncoming traffic lane. While there are some parking prohibitions to prevent this on Elm, they are regularly disregarded. There aren't prohibitions on Allegheny, but there really should be. I think the first 50 feet need to be no parking zones so a turning car has the ability to turn into its own lane, with space to slow down so it doesn't run into a parked car.? Lastly, for the 2 way traffic question on the north side of Laurel, can someone please clarify how much of the median folks expect to be removed under this proposal? For the record, I don't support this design idea, but my objection stems from what I am about to share below. I probably missed a detailed discussion on this, so please hear me out. A quick search of County street design regs seems to indicate that each travel lane would need to be 13 feet wide if there is no adjacent parking lane. Assuming the current layout conforms to the existing regs for such streets, we have an 11 foot wide travel lane and 8 foot parking lane at present. Is that accurate? If so, we are short 7 feet! Taking 7 feet out of the median pretty much destroys the median, including going into our clock tower. If someone has specific regulations to cite that explain why the regs I found aren't the right ones, I am certainly open to changing my mind! But if this is indeed the right math, bulldozing the majority of the median seems like an extreme option to me. Is that really what folks are suggesting we investigate? As my neighbor Randy would say, thanks for listening. Alison On Allegheny Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Roger Schlegel, Ward 3 Council Member via groups.io" <RogerS@...> Date: 4/21/25 4:17 PM (GMT-04:00) To: rickweiss99@... Cc: WACO List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [wacorganization] Traffic on Upper Westmoreland Thanks, George et al, for these informative reports and observations. George, I'm really sorry about all the?damage you're getting.? I agree with the seriousness of these issues. I would like to see investigation of opening Laurel Avenue to two-way traffic on the north side. What you're reporting also bolsters my strong opposition to allowing commercial patrons to look for parking along Westmoreland. More circling traffic would be generated with more hazards, volume, and chaos.? City staff have said that requests to restrict access to streets (e.g. making them one-way, or prohibiting entry during certain times) would require a traffic study. If WACO-area residents would like consideration of a traffic study, that would be (to my understanding) something that would be a request brought forward anytime before mid-fall of this year, for consideration?in the next year's budget.? Perhaps it is possible, however, to explore whether any turn restriction signs could be helpful, since it's my understanding that these signs don't require traffic studies. Regarding that Walnut-Westmoreland intersection, I would?like to see whether it's possible to move the stop line forward to improve visibility and discourage the "stops" that turn over time into "stop-and-creeps," then "drifts-without-stops," and then even "blow-throughs." Roger On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 2:24?PM Rick Weiss via <rickweiss99=[email protected]> wrote:
Roger Schlegel City?Council Member,?Ward Three? 7500 Maple Avenue Takoma Park, MD 20912 Please note that all City emails can potentially be public. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss