¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Difficulty level of adding SiO or SiO2 overcoating?


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

You need a film thickness monitoring system and tantalum boats I did put up a drawing of my design in the photos or files sections, most use quartz wafers and crystal oscillators to monitor the film thickness. I have a monitor unit and oscillator (built by Ken Hunter) the monitor is a mid 70's unit. Happy to ship if we can figure a reasonable way to do it.

I'm offering this at cost (I'll send that off list) as I'm having to move and I start Med-school in a little over a month's time.

Oh the boats draw a higher amperage than the Al evaporators.

Cheers, Thomas.

On 9/12/2013 5:39 AM, Guy Brandenburg wrote:

?
Someone proposed that I investigate how much it would cost, both time and energy, to add on the capacity to do overcoating (i.e silicon monoxide or dioxide or MgFl or whatever) to a late-1960s Electrodynamics corp vacuum chamber with bell jar that right now just does bare aluminum.

I know my predecessors tried and failed; they were a lot better at electronics than me. I've looked it up in the past in various printed and online sources dating back to the 1950s and I'll admit I'm intimidated. I don't recall any details though. Sounded like the hardest part is determining when you have the right thickness, and you have to use all kinds of weird and strange tricks do determine that thickness indirectly...

Anybody done this? How hard is it? What extra devices did you find that you needed?

Thanks so much for your help in the past. (Our chamber has been doing pretty well for a while now.)
?
Guy Brandenburg, Washington, DC?


============================

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.