2.5 Ohm Resistor Stablizes Q5 Final... ? Noting D882's emitter is tied directly to ground, I thought it might ease Q5's burden to add a small power sharing/stabilizing resistor in the emitter leg. ? I cut the emitter lead short and wrapped it up along the transistor body (print side) allowing insertion of a?2.5 ohm,?1/2 w, 5% resistor between emitter and ground.?
Now, as long as the VSWR is good, I can transmit a steady 3 watt signal while adjusting the tuner. There is less heating?at D882's collector because there's a small aluminium heat sink, but also, the small emitter resistor shares?some of the?power dissipation.
? ?...now to make my first contact. .. _ ? ? Jim - AB1BR ?
|
Re: Implementation of the voltmeter option
The latest version of the voltmeter implementation has been uploaded. Added feature is cautions and warnings when the input voltage exceeds certain triggers. You can edit those triggers by changing the #define definitions at around line 518 to suit your application. Also if you don't like the flash rate of the display you can change the rate at the definition just above the triggers definition. ? When the Arduino senses the voltage from the voltage divider going to pin 27 it then does a little calculation then displays the input voltage. When this voltage strays to say 12.5v the voltmeter will start to flash on then off every 750ms. If it strays further to say 12.8v then the voltmeter will start to flash on then off every 250ms. ? I chose this flash rate as it gave a balance between getting my attention and being annoying. For what it's worth there actually is a standard for these kind of things in the aviation world. The root document is from the US Department of Defense and calls for?a caution flash rate of 1 to 2hz. For a warning it is 3 to 5hz. In aviation it is meant to get your attention and be annoying so the pilot in command can take appropriate action. Tried the 'official' rates and it just didn't look right on the $2 displays we are using. Kept slowing it down till it did look reasonable at least to my eye. ? At this point I consider the voltmeter project completed. It's been a hoot dusting off some self taught skills from 20 plus years ago. Thanks for the soapbox to share with others. Now on to getting the Forty-9er soldered up. ? Till later Hank K5HDE
|
New file uploaded to SoftwareControlledHamRadio
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the SoftwareControlledHamRadio
group.
File : /vfo-source-rev6-volt-alert.ino
Uploaded by : hankellis1958 <HankEllis@...>
Description : Added input voltage cautions and warnings to the basic voltmeter implementation. To adjust the triggers for your application go to line 518 or thereabouts and edit the lines that start with #define. As it sits the voltmeter will start flashing at the rate of 750ms for a caution and 250ms for a warning. Adjust the #define line above the triggers definitions to what looks good to you.
You can access this file at the URL:
To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
Regards,
hankellis1958 <HankEllis@...>
|
Re: Question of transmit freqency
That is because the 49er has a direct conversion RX...both side bands are received equally.? You need to determine which side is the correct one to listen to, based on the direction of the TX offset.? If that can't be determined from the documentation, then an easy way would involve using a separate transceiver to figure it out....but someone will probably chime in here!
73 de Lee
--
Lee Hiers, AA4GA
?
The 49¨¨r is a nice, pretty sensitive, transciever. I love that it can "detect" the SSB stations also. But in the CW band you hear the same station on both sides of the zero point. Which side do you have to tune to, to get the right transmit freqency? 73 de OZ1QZ / John
|
I have an article in QRP Quarterly about varying the tuning rate according to how fast you are turning the encoder. I have mine defaulted to 100Hz but when you turn it fast, the rate is 5 KHz. Give it a try.
Jack, W8,TEE |
From:
ab1br@... [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] ;
To:
;
Subject:
[SoftwareControlledHamRadio] Re: connecting boards.
Sent:
Fri, Jul 15, 2016 2:54:54 PM
?
The 49er is not especially selective -- the passband is broad and the front-end can be over-loaded quite easily. This is why Jack designed the BCI filter; could it be, the CW operator you heard is in your neighborhood? Also, if you haven't, try going to 1KHz resolution tuning so you move more quickly up or down the band.
Jim AB1BR
|
|
Wrong library. Go to yourduino.com,look at their I2C displays and download that library
Jack, W8TEE |
From:
ab1br@... [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] ;
To:
<SoftwareControlledHamRadio@...>;
Subject:
[SoftwareControlledHamRadio] Re: Software Upgrade
Sent:
Fri, Jul 15, 2016 8:40:32 PM
?
It was declared--by Jack, I think--sometime ago, and I believe mentioned in the Arduino Nano programming instructions that come with Farrukh's PCB board, that the older IDE (rev.1.165) is used because I2C displays didn't play or weren't available in library when used with the newer IDE.?
I'm a arduee newbie, but suspect there are advantages in using the upgraded IDE. Perhaps the libraries aren't complete for the latest rev or not correct for the specific display used for the Nano DDS. ?
Still trying to get my transmitter to stay on...
...Jim, AB1BR
|
|
It was declared--by Jack, I think--sometime ago, and I believe mentioned in the Arduino Nano programming instructions that come with Farrukh's PCB board, that the older IDE (rev.1.165) is used because I2C displays didn't play or weren't available in library when used with the newer IDE.?
I'm a arduee newbie, but suspect there are advantages in using the upgraded IDE. Perhaps the libraries aren't complete for the latest rev or not correct for the specific display used for the Nano DDS. ?
Still trying to get my transmitter to stay on...
...Jim, AB1BR
|
Question of transmit freqency
The 49¨¨r is a nice, pretty sensitive, transciever. I love that it can "detect" the SSB stations also. But in the CW band you hear the same station on both sides of the zero point. Which side do you have to tune to, to get the right transmit freqency? 73 de OZ1QZ / John
|
Hang time from key down to recieve mod.
I have build the 49¨¦r, but have not ( yet ) the original Nano/DDS board avalible. I use another, similar, construction of a VFO and other software, and have made the 2 stage amplifier, on a vero board. And if works pretty good. But I have had som timing problems after releaseing the key to recieve; it took too long time! It is the time constant on the gate of Q1, that has to be changed in my case. I have replaced the capasitor CP9 ( 1uF) to a 47nF, and now I think it?s work perfect. 73 de OZ1QZ / John
|
I am trying to upgrade the software on the DDS to Rev 6.10.? Am having problem? with getting the? right LiquidCrystal_I2C.h file to work in the library.? I got this message when I tried to compile the program..?? I got an error on this line "?LiquidCrystal_I2C lcd(0x27, 2, 1, 0, 4, 5, 6, 7,3, POSITIVE);"? The error message is POSITIVE was not declared in this scope. Thanks for any help and advice
|
The 49er is not especially selective -- the passband is broad and the front-end can be over-loaded quite easily. This is why Jack designed the BCI filter; could it be, the CW operator you heard is in your neighborhood? Also, if you haven't, try going to 1KHz resolution tuning so you move more quickly up or down the band.
Jim AB1BR
|
yes it does change the frequency up and down and when pushed it changes the hz that it will change when turned.? just doesn't sound like it changes was hearing same guy last night when I changed frequency.
|
For all those people having trouble with the wiring on the encoder, if you are using the info downloaded from the ARRL In-Depth website I suggest you stop trying to use that info.
Go to the Zia website mentioned in the March 2016 QST article and download both the building info and Nano software from that site.? There were corrections sent to the ARRL but I found they were not being updated in a timely manner and it caused me problem.? Also, you can use the software from this reflector for showing the input voltage on the display as it works very well.
When I switched to the info from the Zia website and followed it the unit I built came up flying and worked exactly as described.? Caused me a lot of frustration with the same issues I've been reading about but the Zia website had the corrections and the rig is working just great.
Mine puts out 3.5 watts and I also added the Hi-Per-Mite CW filter from the 4SQRP group plus the AA0ZZ keyer version 2.
Turned out really nice and I have pictures of it in the photos section.
Gary A. - W0MNA
|
Use a pencil carefully and follow the wiring on the schematic, comparing to the figures. Easy to goof for sure.
A simple VOM on AC mode will work. The output has both AC & DC levels.
Assuming you have a receiver tune it to the 40 meter band and you will hear it.
An antenna will bring in signals. Just joking.
My earphone jack was defective, in that it only worked when I pushed the plug in partially.
Hope that helps. 73 Bo W4GHV since 54
|
I too, have questions on this same subject about the wiring between the 49-er and PCB board.? I assembled my?PCB board with the connecting pins for J2 and J3, exactly as pictured in the "QST in Depth - Purdum", pages 21 and 22.??The JPG photo that is shown in the previous post here, doesn't make that clear enough to me.? I know that if I am not exactly correct with my wiring, I will have all kinds of trouble!? To further simplify this, I would like to see a very detailed description of all wiring.? This may seem as a easy task for some of the builders here, but I want this build for me to be successful , right from the start!?
Also, in lacking a oscilloscope, is using a HF probe ok to set R1 to the required 4 ~ 4V?? And, can my MFJ-269 analyzer, help me to?confirm, that the AD9850 is at 7?MHz????Thanks guys,? de Karl, KO8S
On Thursday, July 14, 2016 9:22 AM, "bobarr@... [SoftwareControlledHamRadio]" <SoftwareControlledHamRadio@...> wrote:
?
Does the display change when you turn the encoder dial? When you PUSH the button does the display change?
If not, it's just a simple hookup error of the encoder leads. (I made it too). Look carefully, experiment.
Don't get discouraged, it's a fun project!
Remember if you have too much broadcast interference at night you will need a BANDPASS filter.
I'm working on mine now.
73 Bo W4GHV since 54
|
Does the display change when you turn the encoder dial? When you PUSH the button does the display change?
If not, it's just a simple hookup error of the encoder leads. (I made it too). Look carefully, experiment.
Don't get discouraged, it's a fun project!
Remember if you have too much broadcast interference at night you will need a BANDPASS filter.
I'm working on mine now.
73 Bo W4GHV since 54
|
ok now that I have that all hooked up I chose the J2 Connection I can get the display to change frequency and I can hear my keying I also can hear some CW but it doesn't change when I change the channel.? I don't have much in the way of equipment as I have only just begun to explore Ham Radio.? is there something that I can check or do I need to take it to one of my local club members that has a Frequency Counter?
|
From the 49'er side: The lead closest to Q4 goes to pin 24 on J1 of the DDS board - that is the T/R connection. ?In the picture you posted, that is the right most terminal on the 49'er board.
Decide if you are going to use the low voltage output from the DDS-VFO (use J2) or the high output (use J3). The middle lead goes to ground at whichever you choose based upon that decision.
The remaining lead goes to the corresponding + terminal at J2 or J3.
The photo shows pin connections on the DDS board which are not present in the current release, which is why it might be confusing.
Hope this helps.
Ivan - WC2S
|
I am new to this and I am looking all over trying to figure where to put the wires from the 49er j1 and j2 connector that we added to the vfo board.? if I read correctly it says j2 hooks up to j2?? and the other j1 to j1 #24 on vfo.? but in the picture that I am looking at http://www.farrukhzia.com/k2zia/40m-modular-CW-TRX.jpg it shows them on the j3 and another spot.? please straighten me out?? Thanks?? Nathan K7NDM
?
|
Re: Bento Box QRP - was "Pilot error"
Ivan; I like your box, folks can see through it and see all of the neat stuff inside; besides, it works!? I put my original 49-er xcvr only, in a similar box, just smaller.? Mine had some dividers molded in it, and I cut them out and the result was a nice box and fit.? But for the 49-er/VFO QST build, I made a nice case (I think) for it by cutting up?a old desktop computer power supply metal inclosure.? When I get it all of the components mounted, I'll send a photo here.?
73, Karl, KO8S
On Sunday, July 10, 2016 9:23 PM, "Jack Purdum jjpurdum@... [SoftwareControlledHamRadio]" wrote:
?
Hi Ivan:
Very nice! Last week I added a photo of the BCI on my rig, too, and I'm pretty happy with the way it performs. Hope you have fun with it!
Jack, W8TEE
From: "xeragi@... [SoftwareControlledHamRadio]"
To: SoftwareControlledHamRadio@...
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 5:14 PM
Subject: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] Bento Box QRP - was "Pilot error"
?
Finally figured out the assorted issues and was actually not that far off after all. Was reminded that sometimes asking the right questions is more important than getting the right answers.
I put it all into a plastic Japanese lunch box, and think that calling it a "Bento Box QRP" rig is appropriate. ?It may not be pretty but it does work. ?Pictures attached. ?You can also see Jack's BCI filter on a pcb which works very well.
Thanks to the group for assistance, and especially Brian, AB6UI who Elmer'ed me in the best traditions of ham radio.
Ivan - WC2S
|
Lee Hiers
jjpurdum
