¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSo I think what you are saying is that either: ?
? I wonder how/why that got changed.? There are probably change notes in the program header.? I do know from feedback in this thread that the TX select switches but the RX does not switch¡ ? ? ? Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ ? Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC Staunton, Illinois ? Owner ¨C Operator Villa Grand Piton ¨C J68HZ Soufriere, St. Lucia W.I. Rent it: ? Moderator: North American QRO Group at Groups.IO. Moderator: Amateur Radio Builders Group at Groups.IO. ? email:? bill@... ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Oliver KI3P via groups.io
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2025 12:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] LPF-Control PCB TX Logic at U3 & U7 ? The situation I think we might have is that both TX_BPF_SEL and RX_BPF_SEL are HIGH during SSB transmit. This lets a little bit of the transmitted signal leak through the TR switch back into the amplifier input through the BPF selection stage, like this: ? ? These two lines are controller by GPIO register bank A: ? ? This register is set by the function call ; the code there looks correct and unchanged. Scanning the code, it all appears to be correct. Some judiciously placed statements like this will confirm: Debug("Set LPF GPA state: "+String(LPF_GPA_state,DEC)); ? The fix that I implemented (major change to radio layout) to cure the short that caused the burning smell has created a display freeze issue, so I'm not able to test this myself right now. ? ? ? ? ? |