¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Antenna Analyzer


 

I've got the 3.5 and 3.6 Teensy, but did not use it on the BITX40 project because I don't know if the library works with the Teensy. I may try that today.

Jack, W8TEE



From: "DuWayne Schmidlkofer duwayne@... [SoftwareControlledHamRadio]" To: SoftwareControlledHamRadio@...
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] Re: Antenna Analyzer

?
I played with one of the "Mega Mini" boards for a while.? I was thinking about using in a project, but decided to go to a "Teensy LC" because of speed and size.? The one I got came with out the male header pins installed.? I installed female header strips instead.? Then could just use regular jumper wires to connect to a solderless breadbaord.
DuWayne KV4QB

On 1/31/2017 1:39 PM, Jack Purdum jjpurdum@... [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] wrote:

?
Yes, size mainly. I think the only reason it's not popular right now is because its new and hasn't been copied, which makes the price higher that a regular Mega. A few more months and the price will be lower than the standard Mega, and then there won't be any reason to use the standard Mega other than for shields. True, it won't accept a standard shield, but the new board we doing will bring most of the pins out for hacking. Meanwhile, just use some perf board.?

Jack, W8TEE


From: "kc1at@... [SoftwareControlledHamRadio]"
To: SoftwareControlledHamRadio@...
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] Re: Antenna Analyzer

?
Jack

What was the reason for going with the Mini Mega2560....just size ? Doesn't seem like a very popular board and those double row connectors must take a special breadboard if ya want to fool around with the output pins....

Just curious....can't wait for the AA boards to be available.

don KC1AT




Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.