¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Optimising gear ratio : alt ratio correction calculation


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Fernando
I believe your point is not inappropriate but I¡¯m not owner of group
In fact I was discussing about ISS but I m more into small galaxies : I look at ISS because the scope has just been put out, of observatory waiting for night?
But I like the challenge to be able to follow ISS and see some details in the big dob?
I say some detail but not that much as for the moment i ve only seen ISS at beginning of night so with mirrors not in thermal equilibriums?
I hope I could see in morning this Thursday morning and it may be wonderful?
I know also that fine tune ratio will be a good starting point if I decide to take pictures?
Anyway it seems so far it¡¯s ok with my setting as ISS is only seen by opportunity?
Anyway maybe one day I will buy one a the refractor or mount you indicate so thanks for giving advices?
Last thing : argonavis fully compute the trajectory of ISS but I believe you knew this
Thanks?
Raphael?


Envoy¨¦ ¨¤ partir de

De : [email protected] <[email protected]> de la part de fernandorivera3 via groups.io <fernandorivera3@...>
Envoy¨¦ : Monday, April 28, 2025 5:08:59 PM
? : [email protected] <[email protected]>
Objet : Re: [ServoCAT] Optimising gear ratio : alt ratio correction calculation
?
I hope this is not "inappropriate" for posting to the group, but here it goes:

Raphael, have you considered perhaps a different type of setup for tracking the ISS? For example, there are Astro-Physics mounts out there that when paired up with software like APCC [Astro-Physics Command Center] it helps a lot when tracking satellites, ISS, Hubble Space Telescope "HST", etc. Not sure, but I think also the Software Bisque Paramounts can be programmed to do the same thing <The Sky X software, T-Point, etc>. I figure the extreme CNC precision machining that goes into these mounts would make the task/goal easier (however, with a smaller aperture scope).

I mention this because many astronomers have multiple setups (mounts: alt-az & German Equatorials, push to or electronic drive systems, solar or nighttime telescopes, etc)

I know not everyone is into German Equatorial Mounts "GEM's". They are a different animal, or beast, versus a big dob light bucket. I mentioned it here as "just a thought" or "friendly suggestion".

Perfectly understandable if your preference is to stay committed to your project.?

I hope this doesn't get me banned/ kicked out of the group. I don't think it hurts or is harmful to look at alternative means of doing things.?

Fernando

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.