Re: Imaging, sensor size, secondary size
|
As Jack H to do a light cone drawing for you. That will tell you the answer.?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On May 22, 2024, at 4:19?PM, K9RX - Gary <amateurK9RX@...> wrote:
? Ok... so making progress, I think, in my mind how camera selections. But something just hit me. The secondary size. Obsession intentionally used smaller secondaries as the intent of the scope was visual work.?
So knowing this - will I even illuminate a full field if I go with a larger sensor size, say a 294 vs. say a 533 camera? Anyone have any experience in this area that can report please?
NOTE: I know the sensor size matters re finding objects ... but if one uses plate solve to locate where you are (and it is properly aligned with the center of axis visually) then I don't know that that is a valid constraint on the selection process.?
Gary Myers
|
