开云体育

All, ? 3 new additions to this list: ? Kai G in Ohio, a long-time IOTA participant Andy S in Maryland, same Sandy L in Virginia, a professor at Radford University ? ? Steve

Rooster tail, high cirrus clouds kept me from using 4X integration on the WATEC. Previous testing showed 4X, and even 2X would work with good sky conditions. I went with an 8x integration , Fearing

Okay, thanks. I'll use that for IOTA....and report via the European portal... ...Kevin [email protected]> wrote:

Hi Kevin: Nice job!! Always a nice feeling when the odds are stacked against you and the effort pays off! As for your report format... I looked back on a couple past satellite Pos events and what I

I was fortunate regarding clouds too. It took me a long time to get polar aligned because of so many clouds to my north. The target star was definitely bright enough in my RunCam (with my 8" SCT) to

Yes, nice job to everyone. It was a race between the clouds (and nasty winter storm for me) coming in and the event time. Looks like most of us won. I found it interesting on OW that observers who

High clouds, but Jupiter was peeking through on our All-Sky Camera here in Westport, so the decision was go for launch, and it didn't disappoint. My only regret was running at 0.5 second exposures

Great job Team NEUS!?? While I was out, ready and watching, hoping that the patch of clear sky would stay and play awhile, the clouds moved in turning Jupiter into a fuzzy blob and obscuring Uranus.

Looks like the NEUS crew came through big time on Titania!? I thought I was doomed when I set-up and could just barely see Uranus at 8x, but I was able to record at 2x.? For once cloud timing worked

George, ? Yep, that got me up to 134K asteroids--not quite the same as you, but close enough.? Thanks. ? ? Steve

Steve: I strongly suspect that the following is your issue......... In order to do a "deep search" (meaning, involve a LOT of asteroids in the search), they have to be in your database === to begin

George, ? I'm trying to recreate what you ran.? I find I'm unable to match the number of asteroids in box 3 Select Asteroids.? Where you have 1 - 2023 UV10 (142537 asteroids), I only get 1 -

George, When you pick a date/time, I can set the Zoom up on our account to get around the free versions limitations. BTW, reading your comment about the zero % events and small travel distances was a

All, I received my Astrid today.? Assembly was easy.? My only issues so far: 1.? I cannot connect to it using my Android tablet.? No issue with my wife's IPad and my Win laptop. 2.? I cannot

Hi Roxanne (& All): Great that you are "consistently getting results". ...Tho you can't get much with a Mag 10 limit. I agree. Probably best to do a Zoom session at this point. Let me look over the

In reading Dave H's comments about running Occult for a month date range... I don't know how he does it. As it takes my set-up (i7 gaming laptop w 16GB ram, lottsa SSD space, no other apps running)

Steve: Congrats! I see you got a 1 sec positive (this one being a "good" positive!). (BTW: Hope you are feeling better!). Chalk up another one to the result of an Occult4 search (this was a "no show"

George, ? Thanks for this.? It ties in well with my goal of automating the observatory for data collection.? Here's where I think I'm going. ? The basic equipment list is a TI PD10 dome, Paramount

All: It's a 'good' thing to know how to generate your own predictions in Occult4. Here's a couple reasons why... Several days ago I noticed a nice early-evening event (7:03pm) when I generated a

Steve: NO. This event was not listed on my OW Desktop (I found it via Occult4). But.... I did just search for it on OW Cloud, found it and Tagged it, and submitted my site. It (only) then appeared on