¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: from arrl letter -- what do you think?


 

I agree to a point.?

Consider instead in the context that COVID or any of it's variants aren't going away anytime soon.

It's all about publicity and participation in a national ARRL event really, can't say it's really emergency preparedness can we?

Just to say, one has to be present to participate,? and I've not seen a lot of that really?

Cordially,
AE4TQ?


On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 20:17, James Nail
<james.nail@...> wrote:
Great Dave. ?Field Day is about emergency preparedness and how to maximize your effectiveness in the field given minimal setup time to simulate a real need. ?Take that out of it and the event is meaningless. ?I¡¯ll write this in also.

Jim

James Nail

On Jan 6, 2022, at 8:05 PM, Roger Hackler <roger.l.hackler@...> wrote:

?
On point Dave. ?


On Jan 6, 2022, at 20:00, KE4UW Dave <mossdj@...> wrote:

?

I¡¯m going to respond to ARRL too.? I would like to do away with home stations working other home stations for points.? In that world, high power stations with the best antennas money can buy and install dominate the bands.? The ¡°field¡± stations using temporary setups will become less important, maybe even irrelevant, to others in the ¡°contest¡±.? Why bother with a ¡°field¡± day if all the advantages go to the home stations.? Already 15 or so of the top 100 scores were home stations.? This will only grow as folks figure out there isn¡¯t any down side to operating in D class.?

?

If they keep this rule, we could still do the event here, but why not just be class D and use whatever antennas we can get up over the next six months?? Take the set up out of FD weekend.

?

That¡¯s just my opinion, I may be wrong.?

?

UW

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Edmund Thompson
Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 7:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [N4N-Field-Day] from arrl letter -- what do you think?

?

I get ya. ?

?

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 19:17, Jeff Otterson

<otterson_nospam@...> wrote:

I thought about this for a short minute, and I think that they should try adding a "bragging rights" score: a second score calculated differently.

?

Unique to the FD callsign, there is a band/mode/section multiplier.? DX counts by ITU Region only 1/2/3.? Score is #qsos * (# unique band/mode/section)

?

You know me, I've been wanting to make Field Day occur every 11 months instead of annually for a long time.

?

Jeff n1kdo

?

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 7:07 PM Edmund Thompson <Edmundthompson@...> wrote:

Somewhat progressive for the ARRL, I thought, at least they were seeking feedback.

?

I think the more the merrier should be encouraged/motivated to participate in FD, whether from home or not.?

?

AE4TQ?

?

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 19:02, Jeff Otterson

done?? What did you think?

?

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:45 PM Edmund Thompson <Edmundthompson@...> wrote:

Done!

?

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 18:33, Jeff Otterson

ARRL Surveying Field Day Participants

The ARRL Programs and Services Committee is seeking input from stations and groups that participated in??2020 and 2021 and has posted a survey. The committee said the survey results may help shape the development of Field Day rules for 2022 and beyond. The survey has already been sent via email to some 13,000 Field Day participants, more than 2,400 Affiliated Clubs, and to the?Image removed by sender.CQ-Contest and VHF-Contesting Reflectors.

"Specifically, as we look toward 2022 Field Day, health and social-distancing concerns may continue in June 2022 during the ongoing world pandemic," said ARRL Radiosport Manager Bart Jahnke, W9JJ. "For 2023 and beyond, the assumption is made that the pandemic will be over, and COVID-related restrictions will be relaxed."

Jahnke said the Programs and Services Committee invites participants' insights, in advance of its January meeting, regarding what they consider appropriate for operating ARRL Field Day 2022 during the ongoing pandemic. The committee hopes to learn if participants prefer to continue Field Day under the pandemic accommodations afforded in 2020 and 2021, which included limiting home stations to the Low Power multiplier (150 W PEP), and whether stations in some classes or all other classes should be limited to 150 W PEP as well. Field Day stations operating at high power became the topic of some discussion in the wake of Field Day 2021, when some stations were reported to be running the legal limit on FT8 on crowded bands.

The committee is also interested in views on the 150 W versus 100 W change in the Field Day Low Power category definition, which is being implemented across all contest platforms.

During 2020 and 2021, ARRL permitted a couple of basic accommodations in the Field Day rules during the COVID outbreak.

Participants who could not or did not want to be in a group were allowed to operate from their home stations and contribute their individual scores to their club's Field Day aggregate score. Members' scores were combined to achieve an overall final club score, which then appeared in the ARRL Field Day results summary in?QST?and on the ARRL website.

In addition, Class D (Home, commercial power) stations were allowed to contact other Class D stations for point credit.

In 2021, Class D and Class E (Home, emergency power) stations were limited to a maximum transmitter output power of 150 W PEP (Low Power). The idea here was to minimize the advantage of well-established home stations with superior antenna systems and running up to the legal 1,500 W PEP limit.

Field Day participants may use this??or copy this URL into a web browser:?.

The survey will close on January 17, 2022.?Direct?any questions to the ARRL Contest Department.

?

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.