¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: the Clowns

 

For F***ck'ssake I am Sniper trained! Just let me at them, with this:


John


On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 16:23:27 GMT, John Miller via groups.io <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:


Tea Crumpets, & Jam, (I like Apricot), We really must hold out for some good news. It's been so tough for a long time now.
John

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 16:16:07 GMT, zuiko via groups.io <zuiko@...> wrote:


Yes, it feels as if it is getting better, John.

At long last Johnson and his crowd seem to be setting a strategy which does not follow the whinges of his backbenchers, some of whom seem to be strange types indeed. ?His speech about the way forward a couple of days ago sounded halfway sensible to me.

Chris

On 18 Feb 2021, at 15:52, John Miller via <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Well, I hope things will get better. Perhaps a forlorn hope to have tea & crumpets with Chris Barker & Family, but we have to have an ideal goal in mind, don't we?
Jeeez, it's been tough
John

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 14:45:19 GMT, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:


I don¡¯t believe that he¡¯s a user of any sort of tech, Susan!

Let alone a Mac ;-)

Chris

On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:15, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:

No, ?Johnson is most definitely not a leader by any stretch of the imagination, which is why he writes his newspaper articles instead - nobody there to answer back! He is irritating as all get out at PMQs, looking round constantly for admiration and approval and using the same tired old clich¨¦s, without actually providing answers for anything. He can¡¯t possibly be a Mac user, can he? (Hastily redirecting towards relevance!)?
Best
Susan

On 18 Feb 2021, at 07:06, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:

I agree with the description, but I rather think that that headline was a whinge about the Cabinet prevaricating over the next course of action to deal with the pandemic in the UK. ?Part of the problem with their courses of action has been the tendency to leak what they¡¯re thinking of doing to see the reaction (presumably); whereas Johnson and Hancock should have planned and decided ¨C led from the front. ?But Johnson isn¡¯t a leader, so that was very unlikely.

Chris

On 17 Feb 21, at 21:58, John Miller via??<johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well






Re: the Clowns

 

Tea Crumpets, & Jam, (I like Apricot), We really must hold out for some good news. It's been so tough for a long time now.
John

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 16:16:07 GMT, zuiko via groups.io <zuiko@...> wrote:


Yes, it feels as if it is getting better, John.

At long last Johnson and his crowd seem to be setting a strategy which does not follow the whinges of his backbenchers, some of whom seem to be strange types indeed. ?His speech about the way forward a couple of days ago sounded halfway sensible to me.

Chris

On 18 Feb 2021, at 15:52, John Miller via <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Well, I hope things will get better. Perhaps a forlorn hope to have tea & crumpets with Chris Barker & Family, but we have to have an ideal goal in mind, don't we?
Jeeez, it's been tough
John

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 14:45:19 GMT, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:


I don¡¯t believe that he¡¯s a user of any sort of tech, Susan!

Let alone a Mac ;-)

Chris

On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:15, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:

No, ?Johnson is most definitely not a leader by any stretch of the imagination, which is why he writes his newspaper articles instead - nobody there to answer back! He is irritating as all get out at PMQs, looking round constantly for admiration and approval and using the same tired old clich¨¦s, without actually providing answers for anything. He can¡¯t possibly be a Mac user, can he? (Hastily redirecting towards relevance!)?
Best
Susan

On 18 Feb 2021, at 07:06, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:

I agree with the description, but I rather think that that headline was a whinge about the Cabinet prevaricating over the next course of action to deal with the pandemic in the UK. ?Part of the problem with their courses of action has been the tendency to leak what they¡¯re thinking of doing to see the reaction (presumably); whereas Johnson and Hancock should have planned and decided ¨C led from the front. ?But Johnson isn¡¯t a leader, so that was very unlikely.

Chris

On 17 Feb 21, at 21:58, John Miller via??<johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well






Re: the Clowns

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yes, it feels as if it is getting better, John.

At long last Johnson and his crowd seem to be setting a strategy which does not follow the whinges of his backbenchers, some of whom seem to be strange types indeed. ?His speech about the way forward a couple of days ago sounded halfway sensible to me.

Chris

On 18 Feb 2021, at 15:52, John Miller via <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Well, I hope things will get better. Perhaps a forlorn hope to have tea & crumpets with Chris Barker & Family, but we have to have an ideal goal in mind, don't we?
Jeeez, it's been tough
John

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 14:45:19 GMT, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:


I don¡¯t believe that he¡¯s a user of any sort of tech, Susan!

Let alone a Mac ;-)

Chris

On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:15, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:

No, ?Johnson is most definitely not a leader by any stretch of the imagination, which is why he writes his newspaper articles instead - nobody there to answer back! He is irritating as all get out at PMQs, looking round constantly for admiration and approval and using the same tired old clich¨¦s, without actually providing answers for anything. He can¡¯t possibly be a Mac user, can he? (Hastily redirecting towards relevance!)?
Best
Susan

On 18 Feb 2021, at 07:06, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:

I agree with the description, but I rather think that that headline was a whinge about the Cabinet prevaricating over the next course of action to deal with the pandemic in the UK. ?Part of the problem with their courses of action has been the tendency to leak what they¡¯re thinking of doing to see the reaction (presumably); whereas Johnson and Hancock should have planned and decided ¨C led from the front. ?But Johnson isn¡¯t a leader, so that was very unlikely.

Chris

On 17 Feb 21, at 21:58, John Miller via??<johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well






Re: the Clowns

 

Well, I hope things will get better. Perhaps a forlorn hope to have tea & crumpets with Chris Barker & Family, but we have to have an ideal goal in mind, don't we?
Jeeez, it's been tough
John

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 14:45:19 GMT, zuiko via groups.io <zuiko@...> wrote:


I don¡¯t believe that he¡¯s a user of any sort of tech, Susan!

Let alone a Mac ;-)

Chris

On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:15, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:

No, ?Johnson is most definitely not a leader by any stretch of the imagination, which is why he writes his newspaper articles instead - nobody there to answer back! He is irritating as all get out at PMQs, looking round constantly for admiration and approval and using the same tired old clich¨¦s, without actually providing answers for anything. He can¡¯t possibly be a Mac user, can he? (Hastily redirecting towards relevance!)?
Best
Susan

On 18 Feb 2021, at 07:06, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:

I agree with the description, but I rather think that that headline was a whinge about the Cabinet prevaricating over the next course of action to deal with the pandemic in the UK. ?Part of the problem with their courses of action has been the tendency to leak what they¡¯re thinking of doing to see the reaction (presumably); whereas Johnson and Hancock should have planned and decided ¨C led from the front. ?But Johnson isn¡¯t a leader, so that was very unlikely.

Chris

On 17 Feb 21, at 21:58, John Miller via??<johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well





Re: the Clowns

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I don¡¯t believe that he¡¯s a user of any sort of tech, Susan!

Let alone a Mac ;-)

Chris

On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:15, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:

No, ?Johnson is most definitely not a leader by any stretch of the imagination, which is why he writes his newspaper articles instead - nobody there to answer back! He is irritating as all get out at PMQs, looking round constantly for admiration and approval and using the same tired old clich¨¦s, without actually providing answers for anything. He can¡¯t possibly be a Mac user, can he? (Hastily redirecting towards relevance!)?
Best
Susan

On 18 Feb 2021, at 07:06, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:

I agree with the description, but I rather think that that headline was a whinge about the Cabinet prevaricating over the next course of action to deal with the pandemic in the UK. ?Part of the problem with their courses of action has been the tendency to leak what they¡¯re thinking of doing to see the reaction (presumably); whereas Johnson and Hancock should have planned and decided ¨C led from the front. ?But Johnson isn¡¯t a leader, so that was very unlikely.

Chris

On 17 Feb 21, at 21:58, John Miller via??<johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well





hi

 

Jeesalou! We've got half the PhD's on the planet working on this. And still we are getting NOWHERE!
John


Re: Hi

 

I honestly am at a loss. Did someone not get a "Whitepaper, that "there might be problems ahead, never mind BREXIT!, possibbly COVID19???.
For ****'sk am I the only intelligent man or woman in the room?
John

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 13:28:16 GMT, John Miller via groups.io <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:


Well, I've got the worlds supply of canned food. I wasn't sure how long this was going to last, or how deep. About 50 Litres of UHT milk. I prepare well!
Quartermaster to the SAS!
John


Hi

 

Well, I've got the worlds supply of canned food. I wasn't sure how long this was going to last, or how deep. About 50 Litres of UHT milk. I prepare well!
Quartermaster to the SAS!
John


Re: iPad and ProCreate

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Maybe you should start work on it, thinking up aliases you could use! ?:D
Best
Susan


On 17 Feb 2021, at 11:02, Judith Hall <glenidol@...> wrote:

My half siblings ¡­.I could write a book ¡­.. or a series¡­..plenty of fodder ?:-)?


Jude



On 17 Feb 2021, at 8:52 pm, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:

That is some story, Jude! She obviously did it all her way, at others¡¯ expense and how the heck did she get away with it? Those men must have loved her!
Best
Susan


On 15 Feb 2021, at 23:32, Judith Hall <glenidol@...> wrote:

Initial shock one might say but she had had her health issues. Grossly obese at times and under top specialist at Royal Brisbane. But she led a merry life. Knew all the best places to eat around town. Well versed literature etc. Very intelligent. But at the time of her death she had a husband and a boyfriend. We took her husband along to the funeral service (I thought it would bring closure for her bad behaviour) and the boyfriend spouted up front. Boyfriend got her superannuation!! Husband who had looked after her always was almost in a position of having his house challenged but I said I would sign a stat dec as to my sister¡¯s statement about the house etc.?

If she got into health troubles she would desert the boyfriend and go home to husband who ran round her and prepared sustenance for her¡­.she had Crohn¡¯s disease¡­and then she would devil off again back to the boyfriend. I once said to her what on earth was she doing and how unfair it was to her husband. She said the other bloke was a ¡°handbag¡± ¡­her words¡­.he dressed up nice and was presentable at functions whereas her husband didn¡¯t want a bar of that side of her life.?

So no not entirely a shock ¡­..she did it her way. I felt sad for the people at the office. She heaved a large sigh and sat down heavily in her office chair. Bloke heard it from down the room and vaulted two desks to do CPR but to no avail and ambulance got there in 5.

Boyfriend has the ashes. Refused to return to rest of family who had plans to bury her in the vicinity of mother and my stepfather.?
I wrote a eulogy ¡­¡­.carefully. ?:-) ?:-)


Jude



On 16 Feb 2021, at 8:42 am, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:

Oh my, that must have been a nasty shock for you all, so sorry!
Best
Susan


On 14 Feb 2021, at 11:21, Judith Hall <glenidol@...> wrote:

I¡¯m the eldest of 7 - youngest 21 years younger than me. One half sister died suddenly at work at 46 yo

Jude


On 14 Feb 2021, at 8:18 pm, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:

?Harvey¡¯s sister is five years older but still has the ¡°little brother¡± attitude towards him!
Best
Susan


On 13 Feb 2021, at 15:29, John Miller via??<johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

My sister is far worse Jude. She was born 6 years earlier than me & used to call me junior. Now she says she's 49 when I'm 52
John

On Saturday, 13 February 2021, 15:14:04 GMT, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:


I love my iPad; I pre-booked one of the very first models out as soon as I heard about it, since it was, quite literally, just what I had been waiting for from Apple and even had cash put aside for it! Later on, I sold that model and bought an iPad Air and now have an iPad Air 2. Very happy with it and I keep it for Words With Friends or Wordfeud (I enjoy word games) and other games for iPads. ?Monument Valley is a beautiful game and there are some older ones that I play on an old Mini iPad of Harvey¡¯s. ?Doom runs on that old model and I still love that very old game! ?Quake runs, believe it or not, a special version for Mac! Sorry, I do love my games! ?:D
Best
Susan


On 13 Feb 2021, at 14:13, Judith Hall <glenidol@...> wrote:

Anyone using Procreate? I have looked high and low for anyone doing lessons for young people as some village locals are interested for their teens -- but nothing. Even Apple shops not doing anything.
I sort of got interested myself -- but lack an iPad. I've always resisted iPads as being rather ?useless things that just run cut down software and not much use to anyone --- not in the things I get involved in anyway.
But looking into it I got myself curious. ?My husband asked what I wanted for my un-birthday..... he asks this every year then ducks and runs. ? I could get expensive.?

Jude








Re: the Clowns

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

No, ?Johnson is most definitely not a leader by any stretch of the imagination, which is why he writes his newspaper articles instead - nobody there to answer back! He is irritating as all get out at PMQs, looking round constantly for admiration and approval and using the same tired old clich¨¦s, without actually providing answers for anything. He can¡¯t possibly be a Mac user, can he? (Hastily redirecting towards relevance!)?
Best
Susan

On 18 Feb 2021, at 07:06, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:

I agree with the description, but I rather think that that headline was a whinge about the Cabinet prevaricating over the next course of action to deal with the pandemic in the UK. ?Part of the problem with their courses of action has been the tendency to leak what they¡¯re thinking of doing to see the reaction (presumably); whereas Johnson and Hancock should have planned and decided ¨C led from the front. ?But Johnson isn¡¯t a leader, so that was very unlikely.

Chris

On 17 Feb 21, at 21:58, John Miller via??<johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well




Re: Hi

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Wow!!!
Best
Susan


On 17 Feb 2021, at 15:05, John Miller via <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

LOL! Well someone accused one of our postdocs of "botanical vandalism" because he was taking yew tree clippings:


He was using it to make the anti-cancer drug Taxol.
John


On Wednesday, 17 February 2021, 11:22:21 GMT, Purler <susan.platter@...> wrote:


I looked into doing a PhD at Exeter but could not settle on a project. I did enjoy the estate, though, wandering around all those super trees, and found a book about them in a charity shop!
Best
Susan


On 16 Feb 2021, at 20:35, John Miller via <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Yes, back at Exeter when we were doing our Ph'Ds we used to get a thing called the PFO letter.
Well, the 1st letter stood for Please, the 3rd for off!
I'll leave you to fill in the rest!
Kind of when I worked at Boots' research lab. We called the head office the mushroom factory,
"Because they kept you in the dark & shovelled...on you
John



Re: Big Brother is watching you

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks, Jude! I¡¯ve just installed it.?
Best
Susan


On 17 Feb 2021, at 13:55, zuiko via <zuiko@...> wrote:

Thanks, Jude. ?I didn¡¯t manage to find such a plugin in my brief search.

Chris

On 17 Feb 2021, at 13:41, Judith Hall <glenidol@...> wrote:


Jude?


On 17 Feb 2021, at 9:42 pm, zuiko via??<zuiko@...> wrote:

?But there are many stories on the Internet about it . ? . ?.

Chris

On 17 Feb 2021, at 11:30, zuiko via??<zuiko@...> wrote:

Hmm, it looks convincing, but I¡¯d be very surprised if a single pixel GIF or PNG could do anything, let alone report back to mother ship.

Chris

On 17 Feb 2021, at 06:20, John Miller via??<johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Dear All,
Normally I'd be inclined to dismiss such stories, but this comes from the BBC:





Re: the Clowns

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks John but I really
Didn¡¯t do much. Just a couple suggestions. I don¡¯t write much here but like to get my 2? in once in awhile.



? \
? ? \ ?/\?
? ? ( ? ) ? ? ? ? ? ?Alice
?.( ? ? ?). ?lwr32@...

On Feb 18, 2021, at 12:20 AM, John Miller via groups.io <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

?
IT really has been tough keeping going over the past 13 months, I mean Jeasalou! Without Susie, Harvey, Chris, Jude & Peter, Alice. Well I think I would have been in the morgue. Sorry IF' I've left somebonbdy out Thank you guys!
John

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 07:06:47 GMT, zuiko via groups.io <zuiko@...> wrote:


I agree with the description, but I rather think that that headline was a whinge about the Cabinet prevaricating over the next course of action to deal with the pandemic in the UK. ?Part of the problem with their courses of action has been the tendency to leak what they¡¯re thinking of doing to see the reaction (presumably); whereas Johnson and Hancock should have planned and decided ¨C led from the front. ?But Johnson isn¡¯t a leader, so that was very unlikely.

Chris

On 17 Feb 21, at 21:58, John Miller via <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well



Re: Hi

 

I'm sorry Chris, but I seriously, thought I Would piss my pants!
Hugs John?

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 07:34:38 GMT, John Miller via groups.io <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:


Yes, well it was only 3 days after my rejection letter to be a lecturer at the University of Nottingham, & I saw this on East ?Midlands today!


It was a tough ?circumstance to get over!
John


Hi

 

Yes, well it was only 3 days after my rejection letter to be a lecturer at the University of Nottingham, & I saw this on East ?Midlands today!


It was a tough ?circumstance to get over!
John


Re: the Clowns

 

IT really has been tough keeping going over the past 13 months, I mean Jeasalou! Without Susie, Harvey, Chris, Jude & Peter, Alice. Well I think I would have been in the morgue. Sorry IF' I've left somebonbdy out Thank you guys!
John

On Thursday, 18 February 2021, 07:06:47 GMT, zuiko via groups.io <zuiko@...> wrote:


I agree with the description, but I rather think that that headline was a whinge about the Cabinet prevaricating over the next course of action to deal with the pandemic in the UK. ?Part of the problem with their courses of action has been the tendency to leak what they¡¯re thinking of doing to see the reaction (presumably); whereas Johnson and Hancock should have planned and decided ¨C led from the front. ?But Johnson isn¡¯t a leader, so that was very unlikely.

Chris

On 17 Feb 21, at 21:58, John Miller via <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well



Re: the Clowns

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I agree with the description, but I rather think that that headline was a whinge about the Cabinet prevaricating over the next course of action to deal with the pandemic in the UK. ?Part of the problem with their courses of action has been the tendency to leak what they¡¯re thinking of doing to see the reaction (presumably); whereas Johnson and Hancock should have planned and decided ¨C led from the front. ?But Johnson isn¡¯t a leader, so that was very unlikely.

Chris

On 17 Feb 21, at 21:58, John Miller via <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well



Hi

 

Yes, that email Came out very much ?way ?off the mark. I meant Chris Should respect his wife & wish I should have such. Sadly I haven't had that luck
John


Sorry, if I offend anyone, Chris especially

 

Been watching Apollo13 again. In anyone's book they were:
"The Best of the Best."
John


Hi

 

Sorry to reiterate, but I think this serves us well