I think they have to, or generally will, when other human life is at risk e.g. Kings Cross fire disaster sort of time sorry
On Saturday, 4 January 2020, 13:06:40 GMT, zuiko via Groups.Io <zuiko@...> wrote:
Well said, John! It must be very frightening for all concerned. I¡¯m not sure though about your point that firefighters must risk their own lives; I¡¯m pretty certain that their job is to save lives and property without *unduly* risking their own, but it¡¯s not clear cut.? As an example, when a Tornado made an emergency landing at RAF Br¨¹ggen in 1996/7 the Incident Commander was slated for allowing the emergency personnel to remain under the aircraft while a fire burned internally and fuel dripped on to the tarmac. They were trying to gain access to the fuselage to enable fire fighting equipment to be aimed more effectively. Although no other personnel were at risk there ensued a long (years) discussion about the degree to which firefighters should be exposed to risk.? Good leadership in the emergency services is essential, particularly when it is so markedly lacking in parts of the political sphere.? Chris C M I Barker | Gamlingay On 4 Jan 2020, at 12:26, John Miller via Groups.Io <johnmiller051118@...> wrote:
|