开云体育

I use reannotate when 'polishing' schematics for technical articles or documentation of simple specialist test equipment.

On 19/03/2025 18:10, mstokowski via groups.io wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 02:03 AM, Tony Casey wrote: > > That's a bit too much freedom. LTspice will not warn you of > duplicate designators until

Such an option would be better than the chronological one, which makes no sense in terms of schematic reading. But it won't work for schematic layouts other than two or more rows of symbols or two or

I guess this is the reason fo the “Reannotate”, shift+ctrl+alt+R, last gasp measure. I think that might be currently the only “useful” application of this feature: just erase my numbering

Hi, Marcel: It's not about courage, it's about truth of math. Besides the means mentioned previously. All I can find the relation is 'laplace(exp^(at)) = 1/(s-a)'. That's why I can't understand.

Although, i do get the list when i have an open project I m cornfused! [email protected]> wrote:

Thanx for the suggestion I think thats how i crashed it [email protected]> wrote: -- AC2CL I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as

Mentioning ChatGPT and MATLAB in the same sentence takes courage? I am quite sure MATLAB did not tell you how to *solve* the direct question, it only provided the *means* to find an answer. -marcel

The recent files list is stored in LTspice.ini. If you just upgraded from 24.0.x, you might find the old LTspice.ini wherever it would was stored - usually %APPDATA%/local/roaming/. If you're unlucky,

Something burped, v24.0.12 I miss it Man, ADI has really ruined lots of features

Hi, Marcel: Thank you for the sharing. One thing that's strange is, the coefficient of 's' seems much different than that converted by ChatGPT or Matlab. "1/3.5e6*s + 1" vs. "s + 3.5e6" & "1/0.14e6*s

I added two photos that show how to construct the waveform both in Simulink and SPICE. ( Photos directory /g/LTspice/album?id=301365 ) The key problem is that neither Simulink nor

Do you mean the original author did not belong to this group, but to another group? Or did you mean another member of this group? I understand English is not your native language. This group has been

Hi, Andy. I think you may have misunderstood: "Recently I compiled several models created by another group's member into one single library." "group's" is how you would write it in French, but in

You can send the email address of the member confidentially to the moderators at: LTspice moderators <[email protected]>, so that you can be advised on this subject. -- OOO - Own Opinions only

Do the other models have a copyright of any kind?? Is there anything either in the models or on the page for downloading them, that says they are copyrighted? I think that would be where to start. Do

Hello, Recently I compiled several models created by another group's member into one single library. Moreover, I slightly modified them for my need but I think it could be useful for other people

Hi, Tony: Thank you for your update. you are so kind. For a little while, I was worried that the new version will bring new issue of those 'Don't look up' problems. You give me hope. I am grateful.

I usually just step a parameter: .step param R list 0.1 1k 1meg (Type "s" and put this in the "Edit Text on the Schematic" window that pops up) Now edit the load resistor's resistance value to be

The look-up table has been updated for increased precision. New zip uploaded. -- Regards, Tony