Re: HEF4069UB
windewi wrote, "Can anybody provide a model or a mosfet type for the HEF4069UB" If you are new to this group, read the information on the group's main webpage, and in the email message you received
By
Andy
·
#109477
·
|
Re: HEF4069UB
Hello, The file from ths page contains the HEF469UB. https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/LTspice/files/%20Lib/Digital%20HEF4000/
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#109476
·
|
Re: sluggish editing: any tricks to speed up?
I suspect the NUC machine has a slower graphics processor Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK
By
John Woodgate
·
#109474
·
|
Re: sluggish editing: any tricks to speed up?
Reads like something is wrong with your laptop's graphics card or IC. Even the most low end graphics device should fully accelerates Windows 2-D graphics calls. Seems like that is not happening. Is
By
analog spiceman
·
#109478
·
|
HEF4069UB
Can anybody provide a model or a mosfet type for the HEF4069UB (unbuffered, so just two mosfets and no input diodes) All I can find is a .subckt which uses vdmos type which is a powermosfet, also the
By
windewi@...
·
#109475
·
|
xeon machine running system 7 RE: sluggish editing: any tricks to speed up?
I forgot to mention Here¡¯s a short write up about the circuit if anyone is interested in how DRAMs work inside http://www.narrowbandimaging.com/incoming/DRAM%20with%20BIST.pdf Sent: Wednesday,
By
Richard Crisp
·
#109473
·
|
sluggish editing: any tricks to speed up?
Hello all I am now running some simple comparisons between an I7 based NUC (win 10, 16GBytes) and an older dual Xeon 5690 also running 16GBytes My simulation has ~2050 nodes (a DRAM core + periphery
By
Richard Crisp
·
#109472
·
|
Re: Differences in the work of LTspice on Windows 7 and on Windows 10.
Hello Bordodynov, I just made a test circuit using maxord=1,2,3,4,5,6. I only see a difference between maxord=1 and maxord=2. All higher numbers produced exactly the same output as 2. See my uploaded
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#109471
·
|
Differences in the work of LTspice on Windows 7 and on Windows 10.
I noticed that on Windows 7 Maxord = 2 and no more. On Windows 10 Maxord = 4. What is the difference? What is the best value to count? Bordodynov.
By
§¡§Ý§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§ß§Õ§â §¢§à§â§Õ§à§Õ§í§ß§à§Ó
·
#109470
·
|
Re: Li-ion battery simulation
Hi. In my collection of models there are several models of batteries and their symbols. leadacid.asy, Li-Ion_Batt.asy, Li-ion.asy, NiMH_AA.asy. http://bordodynov.ltwiki.org Bordodynov. 02.01.2019,
By
§¡§Ý§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§ß§Õ§â §¢§à§â§Õ§à§Õ§í§ß§à§Ó
·
#109469
·
|
Re: Li-ion battery simulation
Pierre wrote, "I am looking for a simulation model for a 18650 Li-ion 3000mAh 3.7V battery." There are a few Li-ion models in the group's Files area, but they may be non-specific about the model, so
By
Andy
·
#109468
·
|
Re: Li-ion battery simulation
Hello, I recommend to firstly search the messages for 18650 or accu or Li-ion. Then you should search in "all_files.htm" with the same or similar keywords for files. "all_files.htm" is a html-file
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#109467
·
|
Group statistic
I hope that everyone at AD realise why the uptake of LTspice appears to be falling off. When a new app is introduced it takes time for it to get well-known, as shown by the growth phase from 2002
By
John Woodgate
·
#109465
·
|
Li-ion battery simulation
Hello, I am new to this forum. I am looking for a simulation model for a 18650 Li-ion 3000mAh 3.7V battery. Can someone help me find?
By
Pierre Gramont
·
#109466
·
|
Re: Regarding nMOS models in Ltspice
Hello Bordodynov, Thanks for looking into the model of the BSS139. The results of the DC-sweep with this model from the "pwrmos.lib" file is far off from the datasheet curve. This is one more reason
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#109464
·
|
Re: Regarding nMOS models in Ltspice
I am sorry. Thank you Helmut for the remark. I reloaded the file. Bordodynov. 01.01.2019, 18:22, "helmutsennewald@... [LTspice]" : Hello Bordodynov, Thanks for sharimg your VDMOS model. Could
By
§¡§Ý§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§ß§Õ§â §¢§à§â§Õ§à§Õ§í§ß§à§Ó
·
#109463
·
|
Re: Regarding nMOS models in Ltspice
Hello Bordodynov, Thanks for sharimg your VDMOS model. Could you please add the missing symbol "DepletionNmos.asy" to your zip-file. Best regards, Helmut
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#109462
·
|
Re: Regarding nMOS models in Ltspice
Hello Helmut. Rds=2.273K is Bad! My model: .model BSS139_AB VDMOS(Rg=10 Vto=-1.2 Rd=7.9 Rs=-2 IS=7p N=1.2 Rb=0.5 + Kp=75m Ksubthres=.2 Mtriode=1.5 Lambda=1m Cgdmin=2p BV=295 M=0.5 CJO=34.44p VJ=0.5 +
By
§¡§Ý§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§ß§Õ§â §¢§à§â§Õ§à§Õ§í§ß§à§Ó
·
#109461
·
|
Re: Regarding nMOS models in Ltspice
Hello ci139 , I think the models from Infineon are only behavioral models. A real SPICE model for the depletion mode BSS-139 Mosfet can be found in this file. It's a level=3 model.
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#109460
·
|
Re: Regarding nMOS models in Ltspice
i've slightly tested their PSpice 1 for the BSS139 and it worked for the particular tests ??? https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/tools/solution-finder/product-finder/simulation-model/?redirId=64615
By
Rene
·
#109459
·
|