Re: Article on EDN by Mike Robbins
Dear John: I agree, very large values increase the likelihood of noise pickup, Make even the smallest amount of circuit board contamination a real problem. At the other extreme, very small values are
By
juliorz
·
#64994
·
|
Re: Article on EDN by Mike Robbins
I don't remember seeing the following difference between the regular solver and the alternate solver being mentioned before. "In fact, the Alternate Solver of LTspice has been doing extended-precision
By
Howard Hansen
·
#64993
·
|
Re: Article on EDN by Mike Robbins
In message <ksp2g0+dm2f@...>, dated Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Helmut <helmutsennewald@...> writes: In normal circuits, there is no need for Gohms, kH and kF either. Any extreme value might cause
By
John Woodgate <jmw@...>
·
#64992
·
|
Re: Article on EDN by Mike Robbins
Hello, The Normal Solver has no problems, if the value of R1 is set to a value of 100uOhm or higher. I always
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#64991
·
|
Re: Article on EDN by Mike Robbins
I think for the most part you answered your own questions. Is there a secret .option for seting the solver? > Apparently not, as your next line stated: Because LTspice needs to parse (read and decode)
By
Andy I
·
#64990
·
|
Re: Convergence Problems.
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#64989
·
|
Re: Convergence Problems.
By
jason.vanryan
·
#64988
·
|
Re: Step Change to k of Coupled Inductors During Transient Analysis
Sorry for confusion. Alex, What YOU write comes through fine hws, Update YOUR fonts. --- BordodunovAlex@... wrote: From: "bordodynov" <BordodunovAlex@...> To: LTspice@...
By
Macy
·
#64987
·
|
Re: Convergence Problems.
By
Frank Wiedmann
·
#64986
·
|
Re: Convergence Problems.
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#64985
·
|
Article on EDN by Mike Robbins
Hi, in that article Mike Robins claims superiority of their "CircuitLab" simulator over all other simulators in respect of numerical resolution.
By
haubmi1
·
#64984
·
|
Re: Convergence Problems.
My problems are still with me. I have tried the ideas above still no success. I took a cir
By
jason.vanryan
·
#64983
·
|
Re: Step Change to k of Coupled Inductors During Transient Analysis
Hi Heinz-W. Schockenbaum and Macy.I do not understand why I needed to update fonts. I use the browsers Mozilla FireFox and Google Chrome. I looked at her letters with them. Everything is fine. These
By
§¡§Ý§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§ß§Õ§â §¢§à§â§Õ§à§Õ§í§ß§à§Ó
·
#64982
·
|
Re: Combining Stepped LTspice runs with Narration
How about record it in Camtasia ...... It is free for 30 day eval.
By
Jon Dutra
·
#64981
·
|
Re: Convergence Problems.
Clear- thanks for pointing that out. I'll give it a try.
By
jason.vanryan
·
#64980
·
|
Re: Convert model PSpice to LTSpice ??
HSPICE models and netlist files (without encryption) are capable of running in LTspice. The problem is that HSPICE has so many deviations from generic SPICE. If a netlist uses any of those unique
By
Andy I
·
#64979
·
|
Re: Convert model PSpice to LTSpice ??
Hello, Why do you want convert it? Just feed into LTspice and press RUN. Best regards, Helmut
By
Helmut Sennewald
·
#64978
·
|
Re: Time domain based frequency response analysis
By
Rick
·
#64977
·
|
Re: Convert model PSpice to LTSpice ??
In message <ksmqo7+4skp@...>, dated Tue, 23 Jul 2013, vtlya2000 <vtlya2000@...> writes: Encrypted files cannot be converted. Unencrypted Pspice files will either run on LTspice or need a
By
John Woodgate <jmw@...>
·
#64976
·
|
Convert model PSpice to LTSpice ??
How to convert model from Orcad Pspice or HSPICE to LTSpice? need util help me
By
vtlya2000
·
#64975
·
|