Re: Directory for custom symbols
That depends on exactly which version of LTspice everyone uses. Until recently, user-defined directories were not followed recursively into their subdirectories, forcing you to list each directory.?
By
Andy I
·
#160536
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
I have seen "WC" often enough and am familiar with that acronym, but "WCA" is more foreign to me.? I did not know what you meant until the next reply where you used "WC". Andy
By
Andy I
·
#160535
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
That should not surprise you. The two simulations are identical.? The only time difference is the time needed to write the data to a file, 710MB versus 206MB, which is not that different.? There is
By
Andy I
·
#160534
·
|
Directory for custom symbols
My team wants to have a shared directory where all Electrical Engineers can place their symbols and libraries so others can re-use them instead of re-creating it. This is what the help doc says
By
Jeff Kayzerman
·
#160533
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
Indeed! There are checks for stress related to many other components¡ Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 11:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [LTspice] Execute .meas file I suspected
By
Bell, Dave
·
#160532
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
I suspected something like that, maybe a medical product. But it's still not realistic; other sources of malfunction are more probable.
By
John Woodgate
·
#160531
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
IF this were a commercial product analysis, I¡¯d tend to agree with that. In this case, it¡¯s a matter of a deep dive into a space-qualified design, to satisfy Specification requirements. An
By
Bell, Dave
·
#160530
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
Thank you. Unless you plan to make millions of the product, that universe will remain largely unexplored.
By
John Woodgate
·
#160529
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
Worst Case (Analysis) Iterating over a number of components whose values are individually set to minimum tolerance and maximum tolerance in a binary sequence, resulting in 2^n sets of data rolled into
By
Bell, Dave
·
#160528
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
I have to phrase my question carefully: what does the two-letter abbreviation mean in the context of electronics?? I am totally baffled by the rest of the sentence, but that is not unusual. -- This
By
John Woodgate
·
#160527
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
BTW, for a quick update This is for one particular WC simulation, a smallish circuit with 9 variables (2**9,+1, 513, executions.) With Compression normal, Window=1024, the raw file was >206MB. With
By
Bell, Dave
·
#160526
·
|
Re: Syntax error on .MEAS in 24.1.x
As a c programmer and LTspice user, I would never label my variables "A+A". Just saying. Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
By
Richard Andrews
·
#160525
·
|
Re: Syntax error on .MEAS in 24.1.x
OK, I get that it's a potential issue, although it has never arisen for me. Perhaps changes like this can be mentioned in the LTspice Change Log, with a note advising of potential backward
By
Tony Casey
·
#160524
·
|
Re: Syntax error on .MEAS in 24.1.x
This is an intentional change that removes an ambiguity. Each measurement name can be used in other .meas expressions. Suppose you have two measurement names "A" and "A+A". What would be the meaning
By
Mathias Born
·
#160523
·
|
Syntax error on .MEAS in 24.1.x
A new error seems to have crept into .MEAS directives on the 24.1 branch. Measurement names are apparently not now allowed to have a sign character in them, e.g.: .MEAS Tpd+ param T1-T0 .MEAS Tpd-
By
Tony Casey
·
#160522
·
|
Re: Execute .meas file
Andy, you¡¯re right, across the board. I do have Automatically Delete raw Files set to avoid accumulating large (sometimes huge) data files that I rarely need to refer to. Most simulations I do are
By
Bell, Dave
·
#160521
·
|
Re: round () function on AC measurements does crash on old versions and just delivers zero at latest version
Perhaps we will never know. Perhaps there is a reason involving the math library, though it seems counter-intuitive. Perhaps that is how it was done in other SPICE programs, and LTspice was designed
By
Andy I
·
#160520
·
|
Re: round () function on AC measurements does crash on old versions and just delivers zero at latest version
From the Help, under Waveform Arithmetic: /The functions Re(x) and Im(x) are available for complex data and return a complex number with the real part equal to the real or imaginary part of the
By
John Woodgate
·
#160519
·
|
Re: round () function on AC measurements does crash on old versions and just delivers zero at latest version
I missed that you wrote this: I thought maybe it appeared when you pasted it into the message.? Is that funny character there in the .LOG file too? I'm thinking the degree character (¡ã) was written
By
Andy I
·
#160518
·
|
Re: round () function on AC measurements does crash on old versions and just delivers zero at latest version
I don't know if this is related -- But mag() returns a complex number in .AC analysis.? Perhaps round() can only take a real argument.? Giving round() a complex argument might be the cause of both
By
Andy I
·
#160517
·
|