开云体育

For me, the usefulness of renumbering is limited to (a) eliminating gaps in the number sequence, which is actually a good idea, and (b) standardizing, by removing things such as "Rload2" or a mistyped

True that, but ideas are always welcome. Your statement about an invitation brings up a meta discussion: what would be a usable forum to feature/ideas? Ideally, it would be clearly dedicated to

Have you searched the group's archives, the folders named "z...." on the web site? You could also ask ST Micro and TI for an unencrypted SPICE (not LTspice) model. -- This email has been checked for

Interesting idea. Gears turning… -- Michael Stokowski LTspice Team Analog Devices Inc.

it's a lot of time that a looking for a a model ltspice lm317 and lm337 made by the same hand. Someone could kyndly tell me where I can find them? Many thanks Andrea

That would be good. It's helpful to see what an editing or correcting feature proposes to do, before it does it.? Like replacing every letter in a text by an asterisk! -- This email has been checked

I suggest a report feature that provide a list of designators, warns of duplicates, and optionally renumbers.

Well, I usually find that I have to add or delete parts during development, so on the 'working' schematic, R1 is followed by R16 and C1 is followed by C4, but C2 and C3 do not exist, for example. I

Why? I would think that would be last thing you would want to do, especially if you refer in the text to specific designators in the circuit description. One careless "renumber all", and you'll have

I use reannotate when 'polishing' schematics for technical articles or documentation of simple specialist test equipment.

On 19/03/2025 18:10, mstokowski via groups.io wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 02:03 AM, Tony Casey wrote: > > That's a bit too much freedom. LTspice will not warn you of > duplicate designators until

Such an option would be better than the chronological one, which makes no sense in terms of schematic reading. But it won't work for schematic layouts other than two or more rows of symbols or two or

I guess this is the reason fo the “Reannotate”, shift+ctrl+alt+R, last gasp measure. I think that might be currently the only “useful” application of this feature: just erase my numbering

Hi, Marcel: It's not about courage, it's about truth of math. Besides the means mentioned previously. All I can find the relation is 'laplace(exp^(at)) = 1/(s-a)'. That's why I can't understand.

Although, i do get the list when i have an open project I m cornfused! [email protected]> wrote:

Thanx for the suggestion I think thats how i crashed it [email protected]> wrote: -- AC2CL I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as

Mentioning ChatGPT and MATLAB in the same sentence takes courage? I am quite sure MATLAB did not tell you how to *solve* the direct question, it only provided the *means* to find an answer. -marcel

The recent files list is stored in LTspice.ini. If you just upgraded from 24.0.x, you might find the old LTspice.ini wherever it would was stored - usually %APPDATA%/local/roaming/. If you're unlucky,

Something burped, v24.0.12 I miss it Man, ADI has really ruined lots of features

Hi, Marcel: Thank you for the sharing. One thing that's strange is, the coefficient of 's' seems much different than that converted by ChatGPT or Matlab. "1/3.5e6*s + 1" vs. "s + 3.5e6" & "1/0.14e6*s