开云体育

Thinking again about it, I realized that the "topology check routine" throws a warning complaining that there is a cut-set made of (independent or controlled) current sources only. In this specific

So, does this mean the Windows service account does not know what LTspice is, or where to find it? Sorry, I don't know snakes. Andy

I thought that the advice was that it was not installed in the right place, but I might be wrong.'Not installed correctly' might be a paraphrase of 'I can't open it'. -- This email has been checked

I believe I am doing this

Thank you, the application is clearly installed correctly though because it works when not running as a service

You'll need to launch the python LTspice subprocess in the context of the target user and target schematic source folder.

I think it would make a difference because the solver has to determine additional unknowns with more capacitors, namely the current through each individual capacitor. There are no additional nodes,

Convert the error number to hex. Then Google is your friend. The Windows error code 0xc0000409 is a software exception error that can occur when an application is installed incorrectly Sent: Thursday,

Yes it is a windows error, something about a stack buffer overrun, not sure what to make of that. The message "Simulation failed with status code <status code>" Is my code in the except block of the

Yes...its minor and cosmetic. But if it were me I would have fixed it a long time ago.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:31 AM, Jeff Kayzerman wrote: > > I tried putting all the symbols under the same folder as the simulation. > Let me try to better describe what I am doing. > > A python

It's been around for a very long time.? A decade or two?? I think there would be no reason for them to pick up on that one particular thing that has been there for so many years, unless somebody

Presumably that is a Windows status code.? I think it did not come from LTspice, but it might mean Windows is telling you that LTspice did not exit happily. Can you find what that error code means,

Yes, I read all the advice and started out with a very low value for CSHUNT, but ended up with 5pF in order to get convergence. However, this was BEFORE I added the LT1375. Rather than a proper SMPS I

Oh...I would think they would fix that in this version The command works right, just looks weird.

Hi Andy No...it doesn't seem to matter. I also discovered if the statement is changed to a comment, the behavior is the same.

Sorry, I misunderstood: That is not a new bug in 24.1.4.? The fact that the schematic editor displays it with the overbar, that is.? It has "always" worked that way, I think ever since LTspice had

I tried putting all the symbols under the same folder as the simulation. Let me try to better describe what I am doing. A python service is polling an AWS message queue for incoming instructions to

Does it work to put the filenames in quotes?? As a temporary workaround. I'm guessing it's a bug caused by changing the code for labeling nets/pins with the overbar, meaning "NOT". Analog Devices

If I add .inc/.lib statement on schematic: .inc file(3)_LT.txt It is converted to: .inc file(3)(overbar)LT.txt The "LT" characters get an overbar. Seems if a parenth, bracket, curly brace is preceded