Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV?
Thanks Andy, I just ordered an I7 laptop with Win10. It's a 64bit. Maybe I should go to the XVII. Can XVII work with files already created in IV? Is it an easy transition from IV the XVII without
By
Alan Liu
·
#90396
·
|
Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV?
...I think I already documented some of my early experiences with Win10..and dual installations. I still have my old Win7 files on a separate Win7 partition..and can access them under Win10 or even
By
William
·
#90395
·
|
Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV?
alan.revera wrote: "Is VII a lot better? What is the major advantage of VII over IV?" I'm sure you meant XVII, which is the new version. (Mike/LTC skipped a lot of version numbers on this, going
By
Andy
·
#90394
·
|
Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV?
I have a stupid question, I only use IV and not very good at that. It get what I want so far. Is VII a lot better? What is the major advantage of VII over IV? Thanks
By
Alan Liu
·
#90393
·
|
Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV?
Hi Jim I m running both on WINE. So far so good. Al D.
By
Al Dutcher
·
#90392
·
|
Re: Benchmarking the new LTspice
Greetings.. Here is some food for thought... Let us assume you have a computer which can support 4 threads... Assuming that the OS is smart in optimizing the workload , you should gt a maximum
By
dg1@...
·
#90391
·
|
Re: Benchmarking the new LTspice
Hi If you want the fastest windows PC, look at "gaming" class computers. They have fast CPU (i7, 4Ghz or better), fast memory, SSD, Hi perf GPU and minimal I/O expansion. The only thing you really
By
eetech00
·
#90389
·
|
Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV?
Hi I'm running both versions also (WIn 10). If you Rht-click on a schematic .asc file, choose "Open With", then choose "Choose another app, The previous version will be listed in the "other options"
By
eetech00
·
#90388
·
|
Re: Benchmarking the new LTspice
I suspect that Win 7 is recommended because most CAD programs have not yet been optimized for Win 10. With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO ¨C Own Opinions Only <http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk/>
By
John Woodgate <jmw1937@...>
·
#90390
·
|
Re: Benchmarking the new LTspice
Allan, My home laptop is an older Lenovo quad core i7 and I also have an ancient dual core Pentium desktop machine that can't support Windows 7. When I get home (after work and after my tennis match),
By
analog spiceman
·
#90387
·
|
Re: Benchmarking the new LTspice
It doesn't make sense to benchmark an 'unrealistic' circuit model. I would say it is badly written - or one can say lightyears ahead the current capability of LTspice in the senses of acceptable
By
ehydra <ehydra@...>
·
#90386
·
|
Re: Benchmarking the new LTspice
I don't think you really need to go for a workstation PC. You wouldn't need an overpriced workstation GPU for basic CAD like for running SPICE or PCB design. My recommendation is to buy a good desktop
By
Allan Wang <allanvv@...>
·
#90385
·
|
Benchmarking the new LTspice
LTspice Yahoo Group readers, I am shopping for a new home computer optimized to run LTspice and have been corresponding with Orbital Computers. www.orbitalcomputers.com http://www.orbitalcomputers.com
By
analog spiceman
·
#90384
·
|
Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV?
That 'w/' is a bit of a nonsense, too. 'With' or 'and' or even '&'. But the whole reference to 'schematic capture' is surely a legacy from the days when that was a rarity. With best wishes DESIGN IT
By
John Woodgate <jmw1937@...>
·
#90383
·
|
Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV?
Hello Andy You wrote : " Whichever program you installed last, would be the one that automatically opens when you double-click on a schematic file. " That's the problem : the same name for all LTspice
By
@theeten2
·
#90382
·
|
Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV?
Perhaps its time to submit a support call? Dave Sent: 15 August 2016 19:04 To: [LTspice] group <LTspice@...> Subject: Re: [LTspice] Re: LTspice XVII Co-exist with LTspice IV? "In many
By
Dave Wade
·
#90381
·
|
Re: I'm ready to give up LTC all toghether.
Yes, you did what I advised and found the definitive answer. With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO ¨C Own Opinions Only <http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk/> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates
By
John Woodgate <jmw1937@...>
·
#90380
·
|
Re: I'm ready to give up LTC all toghether.
John wrote: "The formal definitions of rise time and fall time relate to 10 % and 90 % of the amplitude, because it's not possible to say precisely when the pulse is no longer 0 % and when it first
By
Andy
·
#90378
·
|
Re: Piece-wise voltage signals
spangenbergjack asked about generating a complex waveform with both linear and exponential portions, for which he/she has two sets of Excel data. If I read this correctly, I think your two best
By
Andy
·
#90377
·
|
Re: I'm ready to give up LTC all toghether.
The formal definitions of rise time and fall time relate to 10 % and 90 % of the amplitude, because it's not possible to say precisely when the pulse is no longer 0 % and when it first reaches 100 %.
By
John Woodgate <jmw1937@...>
·
#90376
·
|