¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Google groups


John Woodgate
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

It's a good point, but 'few' is probably an underestimate, judging by the number of people requiring approval to post who joined the group several years ago. The lurkers might even be a majority; it's possible to trawl the membership list to tell, but I'm not going to do that.

?

With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO ¨C Own Opinions Only

J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England

?

Sylvae in aeternum manent.

?

From: LTspice@... [mailto:LTspice@...]
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 6:07 PM
To: LTspice@...
Subject: Re: [LTspice] Google groups

?

?

Only thing I want to add is I would think there might be a few people who don't have a general need or haven't needed to post anything that lurk, and learn vicariously through others questions.

So just going by posting might not give the whole size of the community.

Efa

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.