Re: [OT] Re: LTspice Install problem under linux
|
This problem in the topic is long solved, but . . .
The last windows I ran and maintained was windows 98. If one reinstalled or updated like that, junk seemed to collect, such that such that one smartalec explained windows as "Will Install Needless Data On Whole System."
I parted company with win98 & the BSOD about 2006. But I do believe windows does many things well these days, and one or two much better than linux (Graphics, for instance). I half liked XP and windows 7, but when I was buying laptops, they stuck me with vista and windows 8 :-((. Not much encouragement, I think you'll agree.
On 19 December 2013 15:08, Philippe Basier <basier.philippe@...> wrote:
?
Hello Business Kid,
?
You wrote:
¡°... that
was a great way to clog up a registry with junk,
and end up with random files on your
drive.¡±
?
I¡¯m not interested in Unix problems for many
years.
But:
1/ How was it :
??? a ¡°...a
great way to clog up a registry with junk¡± ?
?
2/ and why :
?? ¡° [that] end up with random
files on your drive ¡° ?
Regards,
Philippe Basier.
?
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [LTspice] Re: LTspice Install problem under
linux
?
?
> I have never EVER gotten the LTSpice web update to work in Linux, in
any
> distribution. It may have worked a long time ago, but I just
download the new
>.exe when I want to update.
>
It's
the sort of thing I wouldn't try, as that was a great way to clog up a registry
with junk, and end up with random files on your drive. Windows has got less
inefficient, but old habits die hard.
?
|
