¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

  1. LTspice
  2. Messages
Single Messages Topics Expanded Polls

Re: Is it possible to dynamically change a part's location in one simulation ?

 

Hi, John:

But it becomes very slow, and seems never get the goal/final step, if put many similar circuits in same schematic, too many redundant portions/actions, make it very inefficiency.

Ironically, I need to see how those wonky architecture of TTLs badly ruin the system, and analyze which part/location is the worst, and understand more detail of the characteristic of BJTs, why they can't behave same as CMOSs in digital/modern computing domain. And maybe, unfortunately learn 'how to let go', though I don't know why should I do that, maybe just some subjects in the future I will need, I tend to think more when I am in free time.

But I think you have gave the answer, it's impossible. Thus, I backup another file, everytime when I try to run those kind of simulations, I resume it will fail at the final, so that maybe after decades times I will give up, then I will use the backup to recovery the ruin one which already shown how badly it was.

That's the whole story, but I still think the wonky one will be still wonky. Never evolution automatically.


---In LTspice@..., <jmw@...> wrote :

You can do it indirectly by putting several circuits in one .ASC file, with the components in different positions, and running the .ASC.

Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates 
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2018-11-28 09:57, ericsson.sunshine@... [LTspice] wrote:

?

Hi, :


It occurred to me, and confused me a while, typically I hope to dynamically change a part's location in the schematic of LTspice when I am running simulation, that means different circuit topologies but similar, it helps to "batch" those result in one-click simulation. Like the 'step' directives, but step doesn't support different topology (part's location).


I never used that, but I think if it's possible, that would be great.

Actually, more great stuff is the parts (which change locations) could be changed their 'model', I mean dynamically change, eg: R -> C, C->L, etc, and the polarities. Like the '.list' directives, but '.list' only change the fixed part's intrinsic value.


Though it's almost impossible, but I better ask one time to get the exact answer. Which maybe I could inherit something, maybe store it in my mind.


Thank you very much.

Have a nice day!


Best regards.
Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.