开云体育

Niman -- You can do this if one of the instances is opened in incognito mode (a Chrome term...I don't know what it's called using other browsers). Such instances do not share cookies, and thus you can

Is there a way to have 2 or more accounts (ie, email addresses, I think that's the right term) open on gio at one time? It would be helpful to have a moderator and regular member account open at the

Ronaldo, I agree, although I think we can be assured that something as "core" as this will get some discussion from those who didn't see it here (or even those that did). I could see that my earlier

Ken, Agreed. At the account level also: having a list of alternate forms of contact would be a good things for notifications about many situations (password changes, primary email address change,

Ken . . . <kensch888@...> wrote: I agree. The comments you quoted were not mine but Bill's. I don't see anything useful an indication would do to help me keep out troublemakers. I do think the

Art, I may have missed it, but why do you think not? The mechanisms here and there regarding the capabilities of owners versus moderators have been made nearly identical to what was possible in Yahoo

WRB, Er, perspective again. I meant inbound to groups.io (the entity measuring the activity). Specifically I wanted to exclude from "activity" any of the normal group traffic or moderator notices

WRB, It is unnecessary, and unwise, to assume suppression by the moderators when what you really face is a difference of opinion with an individual member (who happens to be a moderator). Assuming an

I'm not dismissing them out of hand.? Please explain in detail why you can't use the existing features.? (Have you tried them?)? I'd really like to understand why making changes would improve

I'm with Duane on this one. If an owner wants a group to continue if they're no longer around then they should assign a co-owner or make arrangements for ownership credentials to be transferred. If

yeah, but if we refine the proposal here we may prevent a huge thread on <beta> I don't think that it's possible to make that "watertight" Sure

That is not practical. My groups operated on Yahoo for years without any owner activity (a feat, unfortunately, unable to be achieved on GIO!). While not the most active, we had 3000 members, no

Duane: You’re “...just not seeing a problem here…” because FOR YOU with YOUR group’s resources, it’s NOT a problem. ?With all due respect, that is no reason to dismiss out of hand the

James, After re-submitting the tab separated name and email lines I received Quotes may only be used to surround the Display Name, as in: "Doe, John" <JohnDoe@...> When the display name

James, I suppose I should have known the '<' and '>' were literal in the name, Correct. The form: John Doe <JohnDoe@...> In addition to sending the Invitation to their Email this form presets

Too late. Since I already had enough in Sponsor donations, I went ahead and changed to a yearly payment schedule and paid $110 for 2021. That's when I noticed that the window where it says change to

I don't want to invite power-games. If I (owner) die, I want the moderator to become owner and appoint a new moderator. If the moderator dies with me, I want the group to still have the ability to go

OK, I egrep'ed those out, removed the spurious characters and submitted them in the web form. There were 30 of them. Thanks for the corrections. I suppose I should have known the '<' and '>' were

I would think that would be the worst case for making someone the owner.? If you don't trust them as a full permission moderator, why would you trust them as owner?? You could make them a moderator

No leading blanks and no < > on those.? Have a look at /helpcenter/ownersmanual/1/inviting-people-to-join-a-group Duane -- The official Groups.io user documentation is in the