On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 03:17 PM, txercoupemuseum.org wrote:
Some, if not a majority, who definitely want their group to continue incase of their disability or death have no one ¡°groomed¡± for succession. ?I would go so far as to say that these owners tend to be the most ¡°invested¡± in their groups, whether in time, money, or both. ?Their concerns are real and to ignore or dismiss them is most definitely incendiary. ?
?
Their subscribers ambitious and capable enough to take over should not have the option to do so before an owner or founder is ready and willing to step down. ?In most cases it¡¯s just not possible to ¡°know¡± people that well you have never met in person and probably never will.
I would think that would be the worst case for making someone the owner.? If you don't trust them as a full permission moderator, why would you trust them as owner?? You could make them a moderator in preparation, but they wouldn't have to actually do anything unless/until the owner is missing.
I have a couple of co-owners, as well as moderators, on 'my' groups.? If any of them appear to not be in sync with the group, I'd remove them, possibly replace them.? If one of the co-owners kicks me out, I can start a new group.
Sorry, but I'm just not seeing a problem here.
Duane
?
--
The official Groups.io user documentation is in the Groups.io Help Center.
GMF's Unofficial Help Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki