开云体育

Only Owners/Mods can send messages that end up with the [Special] prefix.? The hashtag properties determine if a member can reply to that: If Replies by Mods Only *is not* checked then the email

No, that does not work. Mark (apparently) strips off a [Special] prefix from an incoming e-mail, and the emails sent out do not contain the Prefix. Do I understand it correctly (someone verified?)

Anita I may be in the minority and be misunderstanding but I'm confused as to what exactly you want to do. “share all responses to all posting with all members” sounds, to me, as if you want to

If members aren't getting messages sent to the group email address, you should check out your group settings in Admin. Check the Reply To settings. For information about it, see

Anita, From what I can see and know, all anyone in your group has to do to ‘share all postings with all members’ is to have the members send a post to your address <[email protected]> . That will put

@JS My experience is that once the OM is posted, the checkbox is no longer available for follow up messages posted by the Mod. @BB It appears that the only diffs/a SM is that the prefix [Special] is

@BB. ?Understood! Thx. @SS Not really a problem for me but I wondered if Gio might benefit from cleaning up those who are Bounced. Kinda like mis matched pairs in MY drawer that are of little value

I think if your reply via the web interface, rather than your email program, you can set the reply to be "Special Notice." Another way to do this could be with a hashtag that is set to "Special

On legacy groups, none.? On new groups where there's a cost per member over a given number, it could cost the owner money. Duane -- Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual (

I own a group (Brain Exchange) and I'm frequently? asked if there's a way to share all responses to all posting with all members. Can this be done. I'm reluctant to do it because it seems to me that

Members whose email addresses are bouncing may still be reading messages on the website. And what does it matter if you have members who no longer read messages at all? How is that a problem for the

If this is truly desirable behavior, the only way I know of to do that is to create a #hashtag with the Special flag set and apply that hashtag to the topic. The "Send as Special" checkbox in the

Members who are Bouncing or Bounced do not receive any group messages. This includes Special Notices. The only messages that you can send via groups.io and might have a chance of being received are a

As long As you mentioned “Bounced” and “RI” together, a question: I sent a Special Notice to attempt to round up errant members who have not reverified. ?Checking, some are Bouncing and some

There are already options for "designation of succession", either by a co-owner or by setting up a digital will.? I see no reason for Groups.io to be involved at all.? We've pretty well covered the

Carol, In my experience, a general request for a volunteer to become owner doesn’t work. I found a person who I was confident would do a good job and asked if they would be willing to become an

Anyone can come up with a specific proposal and make it on the beta ( https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topics ) group, where Mark can see it and respond as he sees fit. You don't need the permission of

The continuing failure of logic on this subject is based upon absolutist thinking. I believe the majority of group owners agree there should be a designation of succession. It should be for the

I experimented by adding multiple more spaces, and they actually exist if you go back and Edit the Topic Properties. They simply do not display, which I suspect is “a Mark thing.” I think don't

I have written a letter and sent it by snail mail to the address of the last owner of record, hoping a relative will respond. If I can't raise a moderator, or owner and can't get approval, that is a