开云体育

It would be possible, but it has been rejected in the past, to handle messages posted via the web interface in the same way that Gmail can handle e-mail sent by its web interface and hold it for a

Thanks, Frances. ?I had, in fact, checked the wiki but I found it confusing. ?After your response I logged out then went to the home page to see what it looked like and the wiki made more sense. ?I

Hi Shal, Thank you for the explanation. I haven't use the io group much at all. What's the simplest way to log in to see my io status. I'm currently using my gmail account. Can I go into my

AOL truncation examples: was truncated to 57 characters to 56 characters was truncated to 80-90 or so characters to 56 characters, not counting the ellipses (and depending on how you count?) It seems

Judy, In answer to your Subject: No. I consider the GMF here on groups.io a "sister" group to the one on yahoogroups.com - both are about best practices for group management, but each focusing on its

Tony, That's remarkably short. I would have guessed something like 68 or 69 characters, given the original email standard of an 80 character line (less 9 for "Subject: " and two for CRLF with maybe

I’m no longer sure what we’re debating here, or whether we’re actually pretty much in agreement. Let me summarise my position: 1. Moderators do need to be able to delete messages entirely, for

Hi Phyllis Check out the wiki on this Group Managers Forum for some instructions. This could be reworded more clearly - work of several hands including mine! But still useful, I think.

I am testing Groups.io to move our group from Yahoo. ?I am currently writing up instructions for members on how to get started. Because I am group owner here I can no longer see what new members will

That's not what I meant. I don't edit members' posts except under the most dire of circumstances. But the mods need to know what's going on, and the other members need to know if there's been a

Er ... I did think about it actually. It’s non-optimal because if users can’t make minor edits to their posts without reposting the whole thing, then either the ability will be abused and annoy

I didn't think I'd want or use the Like button (since there's no Dislike button ;>), but have since found a use for it. I use it to reduce the "me, too" or "thanks" posts. I want folks to know that I

The good thing about Groups.io is that it also saves the original, so you can click on the Edited button at the right to see what happened. A moderator can delete the original without also deleting

I've done some digging here but don't come up with anything - can someone help me with what "liking" a message does? Other than showing when messages are being read on a group's page, is there any

One of the first setting I changed when preparing my group was to not allow users to edit their posts. Not only do you get into problems such as you describe, we've had instances (long ago) where it

I find it absolutely necessary. Think about it. Mods need the ability to control after-the-fact posts that people have already responded to, etc. It's just an unfortunate "side effect" of the fact

And the results of this move are...! * These were two old groups at Yahoo...one that was started in 2002 and the other in 2008. ?I was nervous before this move. ?Didn't want to screw anything up. *

This is exactly why many of us (including, eventually, Mark himself, in the beta group) have disabled editing in our groups. We had to fight hard for the disable option. J Sent from my iPhone

And now I can answer my own question, as I'm not a moderator on this group and there was a typo in my initial post ('reposing' instead of 'reposting', quite accidental I assure you!). Indeed I can

The ability for users to edit their own posts is potentially quite handy. But I had a case last week where a user edited his post six times, making trivial changes, and it went to the group every time