¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Editing messages


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Er ... I did think about it actually.

?

It¡¯s non-optimal because if users can¡¯t make minor edits to their posts without reposting the whole thing, then either the ability will be abused and annoy the hell out of the group (which was exactly my case) or the feature will be disabled, as it seems to have been for many groups and is now for mine.

?

And I don¡¯t agree at all about Mods needing to be able to edit other users posts. Delete them occasionally, yes, if they¡¯re really beyond the pale or illegal or whatever. One of the groups (/g/twsapi) I recently transferred from yahoo has over 35000 posts in its archive: I¡¯ve been moderating it for 10 years or more, and I¡¯ve never once felt it necessary to rewrite or edit another user¡¯s post. I have better things to do with my time!

?

Richard

?

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J_Catlady
Sent: 31 March 2017 15:25
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [GMF] Editing messages

?

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:15 am, Richard L King wrote:

This strikes me as very non-optimal.

I find it absolutely necessary. Think about it. Mods need the ability to control after-the-fact posts that people have already responded to, etc.

It's just an unfortunate "side effect" of the fact that groups.io is both an email list and a web forum that emails have to go out for every edit....

J?

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.